search for: ps_handl

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ps_handl".

Did you mean: ps_handle
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...to > work around it with something like this? > > \examples{ > \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code(' > CODE > ')} > } Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside \examples, either: checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block G. [...]
2018 Jul 12
3
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...> I'll do some more checking, then submit a bug report and patch to Bugzilla. > > Duncan Murdoch Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at install time: Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped And indeed the whole section is dropped. Seems like there is no clean workaround here. Thanks again, G.
2018 Jul 12
1
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...rt and patch to Bugzilla. >>> >>> Duncan Murdoch >> >> Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at >> install time: >> >> Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48: >> Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped >> >> And indeed the whole section is dropped. >> >> Seems like there is no clean workaround here. >> >> Thanks again, >> G. > > Btw. would it make sense to just allow \Sexpr as a...
2018 Jul 12
0
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...t;> >> \examples{ >> \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code(' >> CODE >> ')} >> } > > Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside > \examples, either: > > checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block > > G. I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes \Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been me, I forget) assumed that would imply all the earlier stages as well, bu...
2018 Jul 12
0
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...ng, then submit a bug report and patch to Bugzilla. > > > > Duncan Murdoch > > Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at > install time: > > Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48: > Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped > > And indeed the whole section is dropped. > > Seems like there is no clean workaround here. > > Thanks again, > G. Btw. would it make sense to just allow \Sexpr as a top level section? Maybe here: https://gi...
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD check issues a warning for it. (See below.) Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not. Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically? Thanks, Gabor In