Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ps_handle".
Did you mean:
xs_handle
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...to
> work around it with something like this?
>
> \examples{
> \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code('
> CODE
> ')}
> }
Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside
\examples, either:
checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block
G.
[...]
2018 Jul 12
3
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...> I'll do some more checking, then submit a bug report and patch to Bugzilla.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at
install time:
Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48:
Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped
And indeed the whole section is dropped.
Seems like there is no clean workaround here.
Thanks again,
G.
2018 Jul 12
1
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...rt and patch to Bugzilla.
>>>
>>> Duncan Murdoch
>>
>> Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at
>> install time:
>>
>> Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48:
>> Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped
>>
>> And indeed the whole section is dropped.
>>
>> Seems like there is no clean workaround here.
>>
>> Thanks again,
>> G.
>
> Btw. would it make sense to just allow \Sexpr as a...
2018 Jul 12
0
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...t;>
>> \examples{
>> \Sexpr[stage=install,strip.white=FALSE,results=rd]{pkg:::decorate_code('
>> CODE
>> ')}
>> }
>
> Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately it seems that \Sexpr is not allowed inside
> \examples, either:
>
> checkRd: (7) ps_handle.Rd:46-47: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in a \examples block
>
> G.
I think I found the bug. The tools::checkRd function only processes
\Sexpr's with "stage=render". I think the author (who might have been
me, I forget) assumed that would imply all the earlier stages as well,
but...
2018 Jul 12
0
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
...ng, then submit a bug report and patch to Bugzilla.
> >
> > Duncan Murdoch
>
> Thanks much! I tried using stage=render, but then I get an error at
> install time:
>
> Warning: /private/var/folders/59/0gkmw1yj2w7bf2dfc3jznv5w0000gn/T/RtmpCG4Qz9/R.INSTALLec4743ba8cf4/ps/man/ps_handle.Rd:45-48:
> Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be dropped
>
> And indeed the whole section is dropped.
>
> Seems like there is no clean workaround here.
>
> Thanks again,
> G.
Btw. would it make sense to just allow \Sexpr as a top level section?
Maybe here:
https://git...
2018 Jul 12
2
Top level \Sexpr and R CMD check
I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and
while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD
check issues a warning for it. (See below.)
Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd
grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not.
Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically?
Thanks, Gabor
In