search for: protectorate

Hello, Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2? There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector and ports and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the -fstack-protector option with CLANG. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36927 -Kimmo

Hi All, Users have contacted me because they can not build MCMCglmm from source. All are using R 3.3.0 on various machines with different compilers gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2) 5.4.0 g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 Mac OS X El Capitan (version/compiler unspecified) The issue seems to be with mixing C/C++ with the repeated error: /usr/include/c++/5/bits/cpp_type_traits.h:118:3:

This looks like the result of including a C++ system header inside an extern "C" block. There is no evidence of this happening in the current version 2.22.1. However, it did happen in the previous version 2.22 via the chain of inclusions: MCMCglmmcc.h -> cs.h -> R.h -> various C++ system headers See Writing R Extensions P 108. I would check that the people reporting this bug

Jarrod, On 19 August 2016 at 04:43, Jarrod Hadfield wrote: | Hi All, | | Users have contacted me because they can not build MCMCglmm from source. All are using R 3.3.0 on various machines with different compilers | | gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.2) 5.4.0 | g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4 | Mac OS X El Capitan (version/compiler unspecified) | | The issue seems to be with mixing

Dear LLVMers, I am trying to measure the performance overhead (if any) of the canaries that clang inserts in the code. I would like to do this automatically, using the LLVM test infra-structure. However, I am not sure if that is possible. Could someone tell me which flags in the TEST.nightly.Makefile script, (or any other script) I must change to have this done? Usually I insert canaries with

Hi, I ran R (version 2.9.0) CMD build under root in Fedora (9). When it tried to remove "junk files" it removed EVERYTHING in my local account! (See below). Can anyone tell me what happened, and even more importantly if I can I restore what was lost. Panickingly, Jarrod [jarrod at localhost AManal]$ R CMD build MCMCglmm_2.05 * checking for file

Hi, I ran R (version 2.9.0) CMD build under root in Fedora (9). When it tried to remove "junk files" it removed EVERYTHING in my local account! (See below). Can anyone tell me what happened, and even more importantly if I can I restore what was lost. Panickingly, Jarrod [jarrod at localhost AManal]$ R CMD build MCMCglmm_2.05 * checking for file

Hi, I ran R (version 2.9.0) CMD build under root in Fedora (9). When it tried to remove "junk files" it removed EVERYTHING in my local account! (See below). Can anyone tell me what happened, and even more importantly if I can I restore what was lost. Panickingly, Jarrod [jarrod at localhost AManal]$ R CMD build MCMCglmm_2.05 * checking for file 'MCMCglmm_2.05/DESCRIPTION'

Hello, I plan to implement "Stack Smashing Protection - Strong" support in LLVM. Below is a description of this feature and an overview of the implementation plan. I have divided up the implementation into stages that can be delivered incrementally. I'm looking for any feedback (suggestions, requests, etc) before I actually begin the work. Thank you! Josh

Hello, I am trying to install rgl package under R and getting some errors which is below. > install.packages("rgl") Warning in install.packages("rgl") : argument 'lib' is missing: using '/usr/lib/R/library' trying URL 'http://cran.csie.ntu.edu.tw/src/contrib/rgl_0.91.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip' length 1677498 bytes (1.6 Mb)

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:08:36PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> > > The code inserted by the stack protector does not work in the early > boot environment because it uses the GS segment, at least with memory > encryption enabled. Make sure the early code is compiled without this > feature enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Joerg

On 10/1/12 9:26 PM, Magee, Josh wrote: > Hello, > > I plan to implement "Stack Smashing Protection - Strong" support in LLVM. > Below is a description of this feature and an overview of the implementation > plan. I have divided up the implementation into stages that can be delivered > incrementally. > > I'm looking for any feedback (suggestions, requests,

Hi, <This issue was previously posted in R-help, but advised to post here as a more relevant group> I was trying to install RQuantLib in my Ubuntu machine which failed with below information : *> install.packages('RQuantLib', repos='http://cran.rstudio.com/ <http://cran.rstudio.com/>', INSTALL_opts = c('--no-lock'))* *Installing package into

Hi, Getting rquantlib working on 16.04 was discussed just two weeks ago here: https://github.com/eddelbuettel/rquantlib/issues/119 I'll repeat my findings here for convenience. 1. git clone|lballabio/QuantLib ||./autogen.sh ./configure --prefix=$HOME/.local --enable-intraday make install| 2. git clone|eddelbuettel/rquantlib|and remove|CXX_STD=CXX11|from|src/Makevars.in||| 3. From

Hi, List, In checking the page fault problem when using pv-grub to start domU in opensuse12.3[1], found that the problem is caused by ''-fstack-protector'' flag which is introduced in rpm build: export EXTRA_CFLAGS_XEN_TOOLS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export EXTRA_CFLAGS_QEMU_TRADITIONAL="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" export EXTRA_CFLAGS_QEMU_XEN="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" with

I tried building dovecot using : CPPFLAGS="-fstack-protector" LDFLAGS="-lssp" ./configure That would result in a proper build, yet the binary would complain once being run: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so) failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap/lib10_quota_plugin.so: undefined symbol: __stack_chk_fail_local Error: imap dump-capability process returned

Hello, I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using utils::install.packages() and then again using devtools::install_github(). Each yields an error similar to the other but not quite exactly the same - the error messages sail right over my head. I

Hi all. For a while, gcc has supported a stack protection mechanism (-fstack-protector and friends, available in gcc 4.1.2 and up). Can anyone think of a good reason not to enable it if the compiler supports it? A quick test here shows minimal difference in runtime over a full regress pass (~10sec over 8.5 minutes, and since the machine is not entirely idle that could be experimental error).

Hello, I am having errors when I try to install RSPerl-0.92 under fedora 14. I have the following rpms installed: R-devel-2.13.0-1.fc14.x86_64 R-core-2.13.0-1.fc14.x86_64 perl-5.12.3-143.fc14.x86_64 perl-devel-5.12.3-143.fc14.x86_64 perl-ExtUtils-* (all of them from yum) Now I get the following errors: # R CMD INSTALL RSPerl_0.92-1.tar.gz * installing to library ‘/usr/lib64/R/library’ *

You normally see these errors when compiling on a vm that has very little memory. Hadley On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Ben Tupper <btupper at bigelow.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I am getting a fresh CentOS 6.7 machine set up with all of the goodies for R 3.2.3, including dplyr package. I am unable to successfully install it. Below I show the failed installation using