search for: proprocessor

In my latest patch, I hardcoded the port NUT uses for TCP communication (3493). The reason is, that I can't figure out a way how to change the numeric value of the #define'd PORT into a character string. Using snprintf() and a temporary buffer just seems wrong, since this should be handled by the preprocessor, rather than at runtime. The following files are affected: - server/conf.c (line

...less aggressive. Depending on the how loud the > near end is talking it may detect double talk but most often it does not > detect double talk and near end is suppressed by amount of ECHO_SUPRESS. The only thing it *could* have help for is making the clipping less severe, but apparently the proprocessor thinks there's no double-talk. > I think the residual echo estimation is fairly reliable but I do not know > how to use this to improve Pframe and in that way solve our main problem > with the gain during near end talk. How can you tell that the residual echo estimation is reliable?...

>What happens if you make SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_SUPPRESS_ACTIVE less >aggressive. Does it end up with too much echo or it just doesn't realise >that it's in double-talk conditions? My impression is that it does not make much difference on the timing to set this parameter less aggressive. Depending on the how loud the near end is talking it may detect double talk but most