search for: proprietari

>From what I have been able to piece together from the archives of prior discussions on this topic, it appears that one cannot write a proprietary vfs module, correct? If that is true, how far does the non-proprietary nature need to extend? For instance, would it be allowed to write a vfs module which talks to Oracle to get the data which backs the filesystem rather than an actual filesystem?

Proprietary by open source (sounds like a oxymoron) I am looking at doing a project that well use theora/vorbis/Dirac I am expecting to get why cant it play on my ipod/PMP? I am expecting to get you must be using some proprietary format? tom_a_sparks __________________________________________________________________________________ Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to

Hi guys, I understand Rails is licensed under the MIT license, does this allow me to write proprietary applications with Rails? Thanks a lot, Ed -- Encontr? a "Tu psic?pata favorito" http://tuxmaniac.blogspot.com Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant and productive. -- Seventh

On Wed, May 6, 2015 9:28 am, lhecking at users.sourceforge.net wrote: > >> And I, personally, would want an email from aforesaid manager telling me >> not to do any upgrades, which I would print out in several copies and >> put >> in a secure place.... >> <snip> > > You do not understand the situation I presented. This is about avoiding > a

I am looking for some advice on licenses. Here is my situation: Over the last couple years, I have developed a rather large number of fire department analysis functions. I am in the process of trying to publish some packages to make these functions available to the public. I am trying to release two packages that essentially define S4 classes for common types of fire department data. Then, I

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Phil Perry > Sent: den 26 september 2017 21:46 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 > > On 26/09/17 18:40, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla

John W. Eaton wrote: > On 17-Nov-2004, Philippe Grosjean <phgrosjean at sciviews.org> wrote: > > | - There is no possibility to make a commercial GUI for R (thanks to > | the GPL), > > This is false. Please don't confuse "commercial" (Red Hat > and SuSE GNU/Linux distributions are commercial software) > with "proprietary". > > jwe

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 04:00:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> I think what confuses me is that keep talking about a single binary, but > >> clearly there is this separate vddk DSO, and there is talk of plugins. > >> So it seems to me that multiple files are

Hi, What's the best (cleanest, easiest, whatever) way to install the proprietary NVidia driver on CentOS 5.5 ? Usually I'm using the RPMForge 3rd party repo and compile the odd missing package myself from a Fedora SRPM. But the nvidia packages look a bit like a mess. DKMS has errors in the startup script (looking for a nonexistent log_action_msg and the likes), so I wonder if it's

Please be patient and read this... Can AJ please change the license of the wine-launcher (like mono does)? You can still keep the libraries under LGPL. Please note proprietary is not bad and no oss w/o proprietary... You can make WINE a standard of binaries because of competition of Linux/BSD/Solaris binaries. It would be good for OS developers if you Change the license of the WINE launcher.

Hi all, I'm running C7 on i7 8700k/asus z370-a with an GTX1050. I noticed that there are several problems installing Nvidia proprietary driver. After one week of troubleshooting I got my solution. Hope that can help other user. I found this https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3438891 but I've not access to this content. In this content seems that the workaround is using lightdm and

Hello, Razvan > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make the proprietary application 'derived work'. > - I didn't find any commercial projects (not Operating Systems or > dual-licensed but simple

Dear asterisk-users, I have listened that a diaplan on Asterisk can extract information from proprietary SIP messages header fields. That is, if Asterisk receives a SIP message with a modified HEADER (containing proprietary fields) , is it possible to program the dial plan to make Asterisk extract the values of such fields, being possible to handle such values in diaplan, isn't it? If it is

On 27/09/17 07:56, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Phil Perry >> Sent: den 26 september 2017 21:46 >> To: centos at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 >> >> On 26/09/17 18:40, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> This is

Hi All: Recently, I got a query how R compared cost-wise (cost of purchase, maintenance, and training manuals) with other proprietary statistical software programs (or programming environments). The request, verbatim: <--- begin quote ----> >> dear arin, >> >> can you please find out the price of the various >> prop. statistical >> packages that are in

This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla cards. I need to use the proprietary drivers to use the CUDA toolkit. Btw, I had no trouble at all with building for CentOS 7.3 I have what NVidia claims is the correct driver package, a 340 series. It appears to build, but then fails to load. The only error I see is "no such device", which makes no sense to me, esp.

I have a large existing read-only collection of mails packaged in individual zip files as <rfc822 file>+<some additional info>. Is it possible (and how difficult) to create a proprietary plugin (like gzip) which will open a zip file, extract mail and pass it back to Dovecot? Where do I start? If plugin is not the right approach, what is? Another question is how will this affect Dovecot

Hi, I work for a company which develops a rather complicated Linux-based grid-technology appliance. The appliance is made of several Linux hosts, exposing its functionality over a proprietary CLI-like protocol. This protocol currently works by running a proprietary client executable on a host, sending the command via TCP/IP to one of the appliance's hosts and receiving the response. The

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than >> I was with the myopic ISP. > > "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same ballpark as having to trust my proprietary CPU, and

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro11 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:40:54PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla cards. > I > > need to use the proprietary drivers to use the CUDA toolkit. Btw, I had > no > > trouble at all with building for CentOS 7.3