search for: proprietary

>From what I have been able to piece together from the archives of prior discussions on this topic, it appears that one cannot write a proprietary vfs module, correct? If that is true, how far does the non-proprietary nature need to extend? For instance, would it be allowed to write a vfs module which talks to Oracle to get the data which backs the filesystem rather than an actual filesystem? Even if it involves linking against Oracle's...

Proprietary by open source (sounds like a oxymoron) I am looking at doing a project that well use theora/vorbis/Dirac I am expecting to get why cant it play on my ipod/PMP? I am expecting to get you must be using some proprietary format? tom_a_sparks _______________________________________________...

Hi guys, I understand Rails is licensed under the MIT license, does this allow me to write proprietary applications with Rails? Thanks a lot, Ed -- Encontr? a "Tu psic?pata favorito" http://tuxmaniac.blogspot.com Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant and productive. -- Seventh commandm...

...design environment static - all parts of it. We're talking business > process > here, not some stand-alone, uninformed PHB decision. > I can understand you - on a smaller scale... <rant> I have a couple of boxes with NVIDIA cards and fancy screen setup. I have to use NVIDIA proprietary driver, open source driver does not support configuration. Darn Nvidia never released enough information about their chip's internals for open source developers to be able to write more versatile driver. I hate Nvidia for that. I love their competitor ATI: not only open source driver is way bet...

...ing to release two packages that essentially define S4 classes for common types of fire department data. Then, I would like to publish a package that essentially reads in these fire department data types and returns analysis results. My concern is that I may eventually want to build and sell some proprietary functions and I am trying not to box myself out of this future option. It is my understanding that if I use the GPL license, all work based on my packages would have to take on the GPL license (effectively making it impossible to sell software). It looks like the Lesser General Public License (LG...

> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Phil Perry > Sent: den 26 september 2017 21:46 > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 > > On 26/09/17 18:40, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla cards. I > > need to use the proprietary drivers to use the CUDA toolkit. Btw, I had no > > trouble at all with building for CentOS 7.3 &...

...grosjean at sciviews.org> wrote: > > | - There is no possibility to make a commercial GUI for R (thanks to > | the GPL), > > This is false. Please don't confuse "commercial" (Red Hat > and SuSE GNU/Linux distributions are commercial software) > with "proprietary". > > jwe Ooops! Sorry, and thank you for correcting me. I mean "proprietary", of course. Best, Philippe Grosjean

...rary path as an extra parameter. > > Have you tried adding DT_RUNPATH or DT_RPATH to nbdkit-vddk-plugin.so? > Or does the path have to be chosen dynamically? To be clear, the situation is: nbdkit (free) -> dlopens nbdkit-vddk-plugin.so (free) -> dlopens libvixDiskLib.so (proprietary) -> dlopens other proprietary plugins -> both libvixDiskLib.so and its plugins have DT_NEEDED "libstdc++.so.X" and other objects that have odd/old compiled versions in its own directory It's the proprietary library libvixDiskLib.so (colloquiall...

Hi, What's the best (cleanest, easiest, whatever) way to install the proprietary NVidia driver on CentOS 5.5 ? Usually I'm using the RPMForge 3rd party repo and compile the odd missing package myself from a Fedora SRPM. But the nvidia packages look a bit like a mess. DKMS has errors in the startup script (looking for a nonexistent log_action_msg and the likes), so I won...

Please be patient and read this... Can AJ please change the license of the wine-launcher (like mono does)? You can still keep the libraries under LGPL. Please note proprietary is not bad and no oss w/o proprietary... You can make WINE a standard of binaries because of competition of Linux/BSD/Solaris binaries. It would be good for OS developers if you Change the license of the WINE launcher. Trans-gaming (and others) will not change libs anymore, just adapting the launc...

Hi all, I'm running C7 on i7 8700k/asus z370-a with an GTX1050. I noticed that there are several problems installing Nvidia proprietary driver. After one week of troubleshooting I got my solution. Hope that can help other user. I found this https://access.redhat.com/solutions/3438891 but I've not access to this content. In this content seems that the workaround is using lightdm and mask gdm. The case: I tried using propr...

Hello, Razvan > after that I use only the Windows interface to it (like any other > proprietary Windows software does) , GPL forbids me to do that. That's due to nature of the interface. Binary interface to codec make the proprietary application 'derived work'. > - I didn't find any commercial projects (not Operating Systems or > dual-licensed but simple applications)...

Dear asterisk-users, I have listened that a diaplan on Asterisk can extract information from proprietary SIP messages header fields. That is, if Asterisk receives a SIP message with a modified HEADER (containing proprietary fields) , is it possible to program the dial plan to make Asterisk extract the values of such fields, being possible to handle such values in diaplan, isn't it? If it is true,...

On 27/09/17 07:56, Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Phil Perry >> Sent: den 26 september 2017 21:46 >> To: centos at centos.org >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Semi-OT: hardware: NVidia proprietary driver, C7.4 >> >> On 26/09/17 18:40, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla cards. > I >>> need to use the proprietary drivers to use the CUDA toolkit. Btw, I had > no >>> trouble at all with...

Hi All: Recently, I got a query how R compared cost-wise (cost of purchase, maintenance, and training manuals) with other proprietary statistical software programs (or programming environments). The request, verbatim: <--- begin quote ----> >> dear arin, >> >> can you please find out the price of the various >> prop. statistical >> packages that are in general use + their per user >> li...

This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla cards. I need to use the proprietary drivers to use the CUDA toolkit. Btw, I had no trouble at all with building for CentOS 7.3 I have what NVidia claims is the correct driver package, a 340 series. It appears to build, but then fails to load. The only error I see is "no such device", which makes no sense to me, esp. since...

I have a large existing read-only collection of mails packaged in individual zip files as <rfc822 file>+<some additional info>. Is it possible (and how difficult) to create a proprietary plugin (like gzip) which will open a zip file, extract mail and pass it back to Dovecot? Where do I start? If plugin is not the right approach, what is? Another question is how will this affect Dovecot performance and how to avoid any significant degradation. Any help is appreciated.Thanks.

Hi, I work for a company which develops a rather complicated Linux-based grid-technology appliance. The appliance is made of several Linux hosts, exposing its functionality over a proprietary CLI-like protocol. This protocol currently works by running a proprietary client executable on a host, sending the command via TCP/IP to one of the appliance's hosts and receiving the response. The client handles authentication, compression, etc. In addition, it is possible to access the variou...

...go.edu> wrote: >> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than >> I was with the myopic ISP. > > "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same ballpark as having to trust my proprietary CPU, and proprietary logic board's proprietary firmware. -- Chris Murphy

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro11 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 01:40:54PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > > This is really frustrating. I've got a server with two K20c Tesla cards. > I > > need to use the proprietary drivers to use the CUDA toolkit. Btw, I had > no > > trouble at all with building for CentOS 7.3 > > > > I have what NVidia claims is the correct driver package, a 340 series. It > > appears to build, but then fails to load. The only error I see is "no > such >...