search for: proposedly

Hello, I am mirroring the debian tree using rsync. I realised following bug. Version: 2.5.5-0.2 on Debian GNU/Linux. Rsync did not correct old symlinks. # ls -l debian-non-US/dists/ total 60 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 17 2001 Debian2.2r7/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 28 2001 Debian3.0r0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 10 02:30

Hello, I have been working on a proposal for CentOS that would allow certain third party repositories to have their release RPM included in the CentOS Extras repository, similar to how epel-release is included now. https://gist.github.com/carlgeorge/ae71d54c99d3536ee352 http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-March/013097.html username: CarlGeorge proposed subject: Community

Hi, I would like to provide a summary of the different proposals on how to fix the test-suite to make it succeed when specifying extra CFLAGS "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on". I would like to expose the issue and proposed ways to fix it to other potential reviewers that could provide extra feedback. We also need to decide which proposal (or combination of) to implement and

> On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:23 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 13 October 2016 at 20:45, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: >> This is a point of contention and a concern that Chris voiced about the monorepo. It should be in the survey. > > A lot of concerns were voiced on the discussion, not all of them here. > >

The Call for Proposals for the 2013 Linux Plumbers Virtualization Microconference is now open. This uconf is being held as part of Linux Plumbers Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA September 18-20th and is co-located with LinuxCon North America. For more information see: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2013/ The tentative deadline for proposals is August 1st. To submit a topic please

The Call for Proposals for the 2013 Linux Plumbers Virtualization Microconference is now open. This uconf is being held as part of Linux Plumbers Conference in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA September 18-20th and is co-located with LinuxCon North America. For more information see: http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2013/ The tentative deadline for proposals is August 1st. To submit a topic please

Hi everyone, I am a masters student at IIIT- Hyderabad, India. I have submitted my GSOC proposal for Xen in a Box. I would be great to have some suggestions especially about the porting of xapi on CentOS Abstract: My project goal is to deliver set of scripts preferrably in bash, along with all necessay packages to convert standared installers ISOs into customized ISOs which install CentOS 6 +

> On Oct 7, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop.llvm at gmail.com <mailto:sebpop.llvm at gmail.com>> >> To: "Renato Golin" <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> >> Cc: "Kristof

Hi all, Following up on the extensive discussions since January, many of us would like to put in place a process to improve LLVM’s decision making process for contentious issues. I’ve put together a proposal for how this works, and am recursively using it to get feedback on the process itself. Thank you to the many people who contributed great ideas and improvements during the pitch phases and

Am 25.12.2015 um 18:43 schrieb Pierre Moreau: > Hello, > > Maybe my e-mail client is messing with me, but I couldn't find any dmesg output > attached to your e-mail. Could you please try to attach it again? > > By the way, since you have a Kepler, you should try booting with > "nouveau.War00C800_0=1". That workaround is enabled by default in 4.4-rc5 > (IIRC),

Hello, following up on myself, it was suggested on IRC that I better attach a dmesg output. Here's the output of a clean boot & echo 0f > /sys/.../pstate cycle. I can't spot a message that relates to the reclock action, and there's only one weird "nouveau 0000:04:00.0: clk: base: 7 MHz, boost: 7 MHz" message. On the other hand: # cat

> On Oct 13, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Duncan, > > I don't understand your concerns. > > First, the choice between sub-modules and mono-repo has been put > forward as the only two choices because people felt that, if we let it > open, we'd have too many different implementation details and we'd >

Call for Talks, Tutorials, BoFs, Panels, Student Research Competition, and More! All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present at the 2017 LLVM Developers’ Meeting. We are looking for the following proposals: Technical Talks (~30 minutes): - On LLVM Infrastructure,Clang and all related sub-projects - On uses of LLVM in academia or industry - On new projects

On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:26 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Inlining >>> -------- >>> >>> Many a plausible seeming exception handling scheme has fallen by the way-side >>> because it interacts poorly with inlining. >>> >>> Here is how inlining would work with this scheme. It's pretty close to how >>> it works right now.

Hi everybody, this e-mail is to let you know that the OpenMirage project is seeking to become a Xen.org hosted project. The prospective project lead of the Mirage Project - Anil Madhavapeddy - has requested a Review of the Mirage Project to become an Xen.org Incubation project. In line with Xen Project Governance (see http://www.xen.org/projects/governance.html), in particular sections -

Hi Renato, >> Bill's recent exception handling proposal has rules which (if I understand >> them right) ensure that you can always find the actions for an invoke without >> any trouble (the actions would be listed in a dispatch instruction that is >> not allowed to be moved out of the landing pad). Thus with this proposal too >> there would also be no problem in

Hi all, Thank you for everyone that participated in the first round of the discussion <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-January/138267.html>. I’ve incorporated feedback into the draft of the proposal, and I’d appreciate it if you could take another look and share your thoughts. One piece of feedback is that GitHub gists aren’t great for detailed feedback and iteration, so I

Call for Talks, Tutorials, BoFs, Panels, Student Research Competition, and More! All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present at the 2018 LLVM Developers’ Meeting <https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/>. We are looking for the following proposals: Technical Talks (30 minutes including Q&A): - On LLVM Infrastructure,Clang and all related sub-projects - On

Call for Talks, Tutorials, BoFs, Panels, and More! All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present at the 2016 LLVM Developers’ Meeting. We are looking for the following proposals: - Technical Talks on LLVM Infrastructure (~30 minutes) - Technicals Talks on related sub-projects (Clang, etc) - Talks of uses of LLVM in academia or industry - Talks on new projects

Hi, Regarding my gsoc proposal (xen in a box), I have developed a set of scripts to create a custom CentOS ISO which delivers Xen 4.4 stack on CentOS 6.6 with libvirt and fully bridge network settings. I have used xen scripts for networking settings. Waiting for feedback. scripts: https://github.com/gautammaloo/centos-xen proposal: