Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "projecttyp".
Did you mean:
projecttype
2006 Feb 19
8
select, first option empty value?
using the below:
<%= select(''project'', ''project_type_id'', @project_types.collect {|x|
[x.name,x.id]}, {:include_blank => true}) %>
but i''d like that first option to have something like "select project
type" with an empty value?
2009 Jan 08
4
Problem with disable_with
Hi Group,
I have a registration.html.erb page with the following JavaScript at
the top which I use to validate form fields:
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
function validate(){
if ((document.myForm.email_projectname.value=="")||
(document.myForm.email_projecttype_id.selectedIndex<1)||
(document.myForm.email_region_id.selectedIndex<1))
{
alert ("You must fill in all of the required fields!")
return false
}
else
return true;
}
//-->
</script>
further down the page I have the form:
<% form_tag({:action...
2004 Dec 03
2
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Updated LLVM Visual Studio project files]
...;find in files' and
> 'goto definition' commands in VS work as they should.
>
> m.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
> <VisualStudioProject
> ProjectType="Visual C++"
> Version="7.10"
> Name="x86"
> ProjectGUID="{144EEBF6-8C9B-4473-B715-2C821666AF6C}"
> Keyword="Win32Proj">
> <Platforms>
> <Platform
> Name="Win32"/>
> </Platforms>
>...
2004 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Updated LLVM Visual Studio project files]
...lt;Globals>
> > </Globals>
> > </VisualStudioProject>
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="Windows-1252"?>
> > <VisualStudioProject
> > ProjectType="Visual C++"
> > Version="7.10"
> > Name="System"
> > ProjectGUID="{0F8407F3-FA23-4CF1-83A9-DCBE0B361489}"
> > Keyword="Win32Proj">
> > <Platforms>
> > <Platform
> > Name="Win32&q...
2008 May 21
3
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing
Razvan Aciu wrote:
> As I saw from the mailing list the MSVC 2005 patches were made to take into
> account the new files from the development branch, files which are not in
> the 2.3 release. So for now the below patch is the only one functional for
> the release. If I am wrong, please someone correct me.
>
> If someone can make a 2005 patch for the release branch, it is ok.