search for: prohibition

Hi all am setting up a Forward Tunnel from one machine to another machine can anyone Guide me what this might be its degrading performance on a busy server load channel 968: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed channel 969: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed channel 973: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed channel 975: open failed:

Hi?guys. There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help me. I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very simple rules, as the following: # iptables-save # Generated by iptables-save v1.4.21 on Tue Apr 23 09:15:14 2019 *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

Signed-off-by: ZhiHu <huzhi001 at 208suo.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c | 40 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c index d8a4d773a58c..b99e0a7c96bb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c +++

...that appears sometimes? 2: I want to prohibit email clients from ever creating a new mail in Sent folder. If its possible to allow MOVE and/or COPY, it should be allowed, only new mail should be prohibited. (also note that external processes must be able to create new mail in Sent) HOWEVER - this prohibition must be silent - ergo the newly created email is simply discarded. No error message or error codes should be returned to IMAP client. (The reason I want this, is because I have configured my outgoing SMTP server to populate Sent, and some email clients doesn't have the option to "Don'...

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > Am 12.06.2017 um 09:41 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >>> Am 12.06.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>>> On Sun,

Hello, on my ISDN phone I can configure that on the next outgoing call, my telephone number should not be transmitted, instead it should be UNKNOWN. How can I configure Asterisk to do the same? Is this a feature/parameter of the driver (chan_capi) that I'm using? BTW: I'm using ISDN and Deutsche Telekom, if the provider makes any difference. Thanks for your help, Stefan --

...t appears sometimes? 2: I want to prohibit email clients from ever creating a new mail in Sent folder. If its possible to allow MOVE and/or COPY, it should be allowed, only new mail should be prohibited. (also note that external processes must be able to create new mail in Sent) HOWEVER - this prohibition must be silent - ergo the newly created email is simply discarded. No error message or error codes should be returned to IMAP client. (The reason I want this, is because I have configured my outgoing SMTP server to populate Sent, and some email clients doesn't have the option to "Don&...

hello, the topology is like this: centos v0:eth1 <------> centos v0: eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 fc00:2:3::4 i turned the packet forwarding ping6 -i eth2 fc00:2:3:4::1 the output is PING fc00:2:3:4::1(fc00:2:3:4::1) from fc00:2:3::5 eth2: 56 data bytes >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Administratively prohibited >From fc00:2:3::4 icmp_seq=2

hi all, I need different routes for packets with different TOS values, and tried to do this with ip. I noticed that ip does not recognice all possible values for the TOS byte, even when I enter them in /etc/iproute/rt_dsfield. to demonstrate this, I added prohibit rules for different marked packets and tried if the packets are dropped when I try to "ping -Q tosvalue <somehost>":

Hello, Stephen, thank you for input. Yes, these servers have the same firewall rules, and both of them have the same problem from time to time, most of time they are good. Actually, these servers are newly installed to be used as the Glusterfs storage server, so not much data flowing at this time. >From the sysctl output, I suppose it can't be a conntrack table overflow :

In a mailbox that has ACL restrictions on both DELETE and EXPUNGE (i.e. no 'e' or 't' rights), I see the following: 3 UID STORE 3173 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 353) +FLAGS \deleted 3 OK Store completed. (UID 3173 is not flagged \deleted) [...] 6 UID EXPUNGE 1:* 6 OK Expunge completed. (At least 1 UID is flagged \deleted in mailbox) Shouldn't these commands be returning

Signed-off-by: ZhiHu <huzhi001 at 208suo.com> --- .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c | 40 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c index d8a4d773a58c..b99e0a7c96bb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c +++

* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com> wrote: > Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c > which is separated from the function definition and is hard > to catch up the kernel update. > To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new > NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for making kprobe blacklist at > build time. Since the NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()

On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 06:01, likun <kun.li at ucarinc.com> wrote: > Hi?guys. > > There is a wierd problem with iptables recently, hopes somebody can help > me. > > I have installed Centos 7.2.1511 on a bare metal Dell server these days, > disabled firewalld and enabled iptables.services, and setup a group of very > simple rules, as the following: > > I believe

not sure how i got signed up for this and i don?t see a way to unsubscribe. this is flooding my email with things i don?t care about. On Fri, Jul 14, 2023, at 1:14 AM, huzhi001 at 208suo.com wrote: > Signed-off-by: ZhiHu <huzhi001 at 208suo.com> > --- > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c | 40 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Hello Dovecot Community, I am using Dovecot 2.2.13-12~deb8u1 (Debian Jessie). separator = / listescape plugin is NOT active LAYOUT=fs is NOT active I would like to prohibit a creation of folders with dot "." in the names - so creation of a folder "foo.bar" should NOT be possible. Currently, when I create "foo.bar" in Outlook 2013 it will be created but won't

I'm using fedora 9, 64-bit edition, on a machine acting as a client. I've installed samba-client 3.2.0 from a binary package. I amn't running the server portion of samba(smbd, nmbd, or even winbindd). I'm trying to access shares on another windows machine, on the same network 192.168.1.0/24. Both machines, the client and the server, are using DHCP to acquire IP addresses. When I

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 10.01.2017 17:38, Marek Grondecki wrote: >> Hello Dovecot Community, >> >> I am using Dovecot 2.2.13-12~deb8u1 (Debian Jessie). >> >> separator = / >> listescape plugin is NOT active >> LAYOUT=fs is NOT active >> >> I would like to prohibit a creation

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 04:53:18 +0000 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com> wrote: > .entry.text is a code area which is used for interrupt/syscall > entries, and there are many sensitive codes. > Thus, it is better to prohibit probing on all of such codes > instead of a part of that. > Since some symbols are already registered on kprobe blacklist, > this also

On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 04:53:18 +0000 Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt at hitachi.com> wrote: > .entry.text is a code area which is used for interrupt/syscall > entries, and there are many sensitive codes. > Thus, it is better to prohibit probing on all of such codes > instead of a part of that. > Since some symbols are already registered on kprobe blacklist, > this also