search for: producenci

Hi R users, I am trying to use the optim function to maximize a likelihood funciton, and I got the following warning messages. Could anyone explain to me what messege 31 means exactly? Is it a cause for concern? Since the value of convergence turns out to be zero, it means that the converging is successful, right? So can I assume that the parameter estimates generated thereafter are reliable MLE

I'm seeing a segfault on x86_64 Linux with the following code: desc = read.dcf("BAD") con = gzfile("test.gz", "wt") write.dcf(desc, file=con) close(con) where BAD has a long field (see below for example). The crash happens inside dummy_vfprintf. I think the issue is that the va_list ap is modified by the first vsnprintf call

Hello everyone, I was trying to do some distribution fitting with a numerical field called Tolls. The sample size = 999 rows. Basically I assigned the Toll data to a new variable K by doing: k<-dtest$Toll After that, tried to fit a gamma distribution by doing: fitG<-fitdist(k, "gamma") Then the following messages showed (oh and I checked for empty rows before doing this):

After a run multdrc comment in R program, show warning sign in this program. I attached the saving page of the script. I hope you could help me, please. Thanks a lot A. Rahbari -------------- next part -------------- R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.1.0 (2005-04-18), ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are

This is a proposal to enhance TableGen's ability to analyze and manipulate DAGs. Hopefully this will allows more complex DAGs to be built in TableGen. 1. Add a new value suffix. value(index) The value must be a DAG. The index specifies the operator or an operand, whose value is produced. The index can be 0 produce the operator 1...n produce operand by

I have found a strange scoping problem in Sweave. The following Rnw file doesn't produce the same output in Sweave as it does if I produce an R file using Stangle and execute that: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \begin{document} <<R>>= election <- data.frame(A=1:3, B=9:7, C=rep(0,3)) partytotal <- rep(0, ncol(election)) for (i in 1:ncol(election)) { partytotal[i] <-

Is it possible to produce the same graphic in different formats in one shot? Now if I want to produce the same graphic in pdf, ps and jpeg I run the producing code, but I change the graphic device, and I choose successively : pdf(...) ps(...) jpeg(...) So in this case I run the same code 3 times, or I have to choose a format and use converters... Is it possible to produce the 3 graphics in once

[[ this has first bounced to me as 'list-manager', because the subject said ``Returned mail: User unknown'' Paul, I assume you'd approve the subject I've chosen... -- Martin M ]] hi for those who are interested ... the following is a LaTeX document which describes the current state of mathematical expression syntax in R paul ------CUT

Hello there, I would like to produce a plot of x<-c(4,5,6),which is the mean of each group and y<-c('groupA','groupB','groupC'). plot (x,y) can not produce any graphics because y is not numerical. What should I do to produce this graphic? Thank you in advance Lisa Wang Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto,Ca

The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results under Intel Darwin9 are appended below. Jack Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL:

Please guide me through to resolve the error message that I get this is what i have done. >x1<- rnorm(100,2,1) >x1fitbeta<-fitdistr(x1,"beta") Error in fitdistr(x1, "beta") : 'start' must be a named list Yes, I do understand that sometime for the distribution to converge to the given set of data, it requires initial parameters of the distribution, to

> I've been discussing a model with David that might steer poison back towards > something that simply supports algebraic simplification. If we have a math > operation that cannot wrap, then it notionally produces as many bits of > undef as the operation could possibly produce. For example, "add nsw i8" can > produce an i9 undef, and "mul nsw i8" can produce

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:21:07PM -0800, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > > Improves cacheline transfer flow of available ring header. > > > > Virtqueues are implemented as a pair of rings, one producer->consumer > > avail ring and one consumer->producer used ring; preceding the > > avail ring

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 02:34:33PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:21:07PM -0800, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > > Improves cacheline transfer flow of available ring header. > > > > Virtqueues are implemented as a pair of rings, one producer->consumer > > avail ring and one consumer->producer used ring; preceding the > > avail ring

How do I specify which option should be initially selected when using the collection_select command? I''ve tried: collection_select(:selectionfilter, :producer_id, Producer.find(:all), :id, :name, {:include_blank => true, :selected_value => @initial_selection}) However it doesn''t return the desired results (the option with the value of @initial_selection selected).

On 2020/8/5 ??1:45, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > On 8/5/2020 10:36 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/8/4 ??5:31, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 8/4/2020 4:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote: >>>>> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup

Hi, sorry for repeating the question but this is kind of important to me and i don't know whom should i ask. So as noted before when I do a parameter fit to the beta distr i get: fitdist(vectNorm,"beta"); Fitting of the distribution ' beta ' by maximum likelihood Parameters: estimate Std. Error shape1 2.148779 0.1458042 shape2 810.067515 61.8608126 Warning

Building llvm 2.3 and llvm-gcc4.2-2.3 on Mac OS X 10.5, I am seeing the following failures remaining in the gcc 4.2.1 gfortran testsuite... LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL:

On 2020/7/15 ??4:56, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: > > > On 7/15/2020 4:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 2020/7/13 ??5:47, Zhu, Lingshan wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 7/13/2020 4:22 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> >>>> On 2020/7/12 ??10:49, Zhu Lingshan wrote: >>>>> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup

One way around this is to say that there are some special instructions, icmp, sext and zext which produce a value solely composed of poison bits if any of their input bits is poison. So `<poison> icmp X` is poison for any value of X, including INT_MAX. This is one way poison could be fundamentally different from undef. -- Sanjoy On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Matthias Braun <matze at