Displaying 20 results from an estimated 23 matches for "procotoll".
Did you mean:
procotol
2020 Sep 19
1
extra fields question
Hi,
I'm trying to configure the use of plugins per user in dovecot, more
specifically, fts and fts_solr. It happen to have other necessary
plugins per protocol, for example "imap_quota" which would be
specifically for the imap protocol and which does not apply for the lmtp
protocol.
For this I need to specify that for the imap protocol I have:
protocol imap {
mail_plugins =
2004 Aug 06
2
yp dir listing
On 4 Aug 2003 at 2:09, Karl Heyes wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 01:27, Arc wrote:
>
> > > There was a header mismatch, make sure that the icecast's used are
> > > recent enough first.
> >
> > I think the discussion needs to be opened as per setting a standard
> > and sticking with it. It's not just Ices/Icecast anymore, if we
> > just
2005 Apr 22
1
creating subfolders without preceding inbox wanted?
Hello,
today I accidentally created a subfolder "Trash" instead of INBOX.Trash.
No error was given, the creation lead to the folder ".Trash". If I know
this folder, I can also select it. But a "list * * " doesn't show the
Trash folder. How could I ever find this folder by the imap-procotol if
I don't know it's name? Is this the correct behaviour? Or
2002 May 17
1
[Bug 248] New: scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248
Summary: scp doesn't support ssh2 protocol
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: scp
AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org
ReportedBy: liug
2014 Dec 02
2
disabling certain ciphers
On 12/2/2014 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 02.12.2014 um 06:44 schrieb Will Yardley:
>> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:27:48PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>>> On 12/1/2014 4:43 PM, Will Yardley wrote:
>>>> Can you use both ssl_protocols *and* ssl_cipher_list in the same config
>>>> (in a way that's sane)?
>>>
>>>> Is there a
2006 Aug 21
2
Dovecot SSL issue on Solaris 10 x64 (64-bit)
I'm having an issue with Thunderbird (and Opera) and Dovecot SSL on a
Solaris 10.
My OS is Solaris 10 6/06 x86 (running in 64-bit mode) using ZFS (disk
mirror) as the
filesystem for my users. Dovecot version is 1.0rc7 (logs below are from
1.0rc6).
First the connection asks if the SSL-certificate should be accepted,
accepting it
seems to work but then nothing happens. Thunderbird is
2008 Feb 02
1
problem with Mustek UPS - Freebsd
On Feb 2, 2008 10:16 AM, Luki <looky at poczta.fm> wrote:
> Hello Carlos
>
> could you please help me to solve issue with Mustek 1000VA UPS under
> Freebsd ?
> I am not able to connect with it :
>
> >Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller
> >Network UPS Tools - Megatec protocol driver 1.5.4 [megatec]
> >Carlos Rodrigues (c) 2003-2007
>
>
2003 Nov 12
1
IPSec pass through
Hello People,
I am trying to get one LAN-computer access an remote VPN.
10.0.66.x->my-firewall->----internet----<-remote-firewall<-customer-comp-with-officialIP
http://www.shorewall.net/ports.htm does suggest to put "IPSEC" at the protocol field.
though IPSEC is not recognized by /etc/protocols
nothing bad, just a useless hint as u need to put "ESP" or
2014 Dec 02
0
disabling certain ciphers
Am 02.12.2014 um 17:33 schrieb Darren Pilgrim:
> On 12/2/2014 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> ssl_cipher_list = HIGH:!RC4:!MD5:!SRP:!PSK:!aNULL:@STRENGTH
>>>> ssl_dh_parameters_length = 2048
>>>> ssl_parameters_regenerate = 0
>>>> ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3 TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2
>>>
>>> But why does ssl_protocols behave
2004 Aug 06
0
yp dir listing
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:14:21AM +0200, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
>
> If your talking about a icecast2-yellowpages-procotol-docu: I had the
> same impression that there is no current docu available and wrote
> one. But as soon as I releaed it via mailinglist somebody pointed me
> to a "hidden" document by Oddsock. It's at:
>
2006 Feb 27
1
HTTP interface
Hi!
I'm asking here if anybody knows about this issue, otherwise I'll maybe disturb
xen-users :)
I tried (with our packages) to activate the xend http interface... When i
connect to it, though, I only can see a white page with two slashes on it, that
link back to the page itself... Anyone know what's going on, and if it is a
missing dependency problem (in which case we should at
2008 Aug 10
1
conntrack-tools and Session syncing
Hi folks,
I have 2 firewalls, setup with Centos 5.2. They are also routers, connected
to 2 upstream routers.
I have some cases where connections from servers to the internet leave my
network via router2 and answers come back via router1. So I added conntrack
tools to both routers/firewalls to synchronize the session tables (using
ftfw procotol).
That works as expected. If e.g. I ping from
1998 Dec 23
1
inconsistent browsing info for samba server
Hi there,
I have two Samba servers running within an NT domain. One Samba
(F-Samba) server runs samba-1.9.18.10 on top of FreeBSD-2.2.8 and the
other (L-Samba) runs samba-1.9.18p2-C6 on a RedHat Linux variant. All of
our NT machines run NT4,SP4. One is workstation and the rest run server.
The PDC is an NT Server (NT1).
F-Samba and L-Samba only show up in the browsers of about half of
the
2001 Jun 06
1
Metadata
Having not been reading the list regularly for the past few months, I've
been reading through for the past few days trying to catch up. I was
wondering what the current state of Vorbis metadata was. Has anything
been agreed upon as far as how metadata is to be stored? It seems every
time this was brought up before it turned into a large debate and nothing
was ever resolved.
Tony Arcieri
2000 Apr 09
0
Machines not disappearing from browse list
Hello,
we are using "samba-2.0.6" (running on linux-2.2.14 machine). On our
client machines we use "Windows 9x". There are 2 network segments:
Segment 1 (192.168.1.0):
- 13 Win95 client machines
- 1 samba-2.0.6 server ("fsa01") which is WINS, DMB and LMB in its
network segment (192.168.1.0). This samba is also the login server for
our Win9x clients.
Segment 2
2008 Aug 01
2
Using LDAP, no PDC/BDC, for multiple samba servers
Hi
Is it possible to use single LDAP server and multiple samba servers?
The problem I'm having now is
Each server thinks their host name is their LDAP domain name, or
sambaDomainName, and
complain the user's SID is different so can't authenticate.
How do I make samba servers use one domain name and SID?
LDAP domain name is DOMSMB
dn: sambaDomainName=DOMSMB,dc=my-domain,dc=com
2004 Aug 06
3
yp dir listing
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 06:50:56PM +0100, Karl Heyes wrote:
>
> > We've been having a major problem with our icecast servers, some streams
> > are being sent to the YP servers and others are not, and yes the public
> > bit is set as confirmed by connecting to the streams directly and
> > looking at the headers they send.
>
> There was a header mismatch, make
2000 Apr 12
1
AW: Machines not disappearing from browse list
I've exactly the same problem. My config looks similar to yours: 1 samba as
wins server (wins support=yes" on one segment, 1 samba as "wins server
client" (wins server = xxx). The "wins server client" never discards
machines from segment 1. I looked at the browse.dat and the wins.dat on the
server on segment 1. There are no entries of the shutdowned maschines. Only
in
2010 Jun 28
3
[PATCHv2] vhost-net: add dhclient work-around from userspace
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4 DHCP response packets,
and fill in the checksum for these.
The issue we are solving is that on linux guests, some apps
that use recvmsg with AF_PACKET sockets, don't know how to
handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
The interface to return the relevant information
2010 Jun 28
3
[PATCHv2] vhost-net: add dhclient work-around from userspace
Userspace virtio server has the following hack
so guests rely on it, and we have to replicate it, too:
Use port number to detect incoming IPv4 DHCP response packets,
and fill in the checksum for these.
The issue we are solving is that on linux guests, some apps
that use recvmsg with AF_PACKET sockets, don't know how to
handle CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
The interface to return the relevant information