search for: problerm

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "problerm".

Did you mean: problem
2003 Jun 06
1
Problerm building R-1.7.0 on OpenBSD3.2/sparc64
Hi all, I try to build R-1.7.0 + patches. when problem arise. I start with appling the patches and second configure and make. Any ideas whats wrong (wrong compiler wrong make version or missing an essential library...) /Ulf D heres the log: **** cut************ making method_meta_data.d from method_meta_data.c making slot.d from slot.c making class_support.d from class_support.c making tests.d
2010 May 24
1
[LLVMdev] obtain programer-defined structure name.
Hi, I intend to trace the Use instructions of a variable object in its lifecycle, so, the first step is to obtain the type of the object. However, the datastructure object is complicated typed value, such as "struct file *f" in linux kernel. The problerm is what operations should be taken to obtain the type of Value "struct *file", and locate or such type Value*s *in a procedure. Have I made myself clear? thanks. Tian Shuo 2010-5-24 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org...
2009 Nov 06
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.6 build failed,
Thank you for reply, I have tried building llvm-2.6 first in place, and configure llvm-gcc-4.2 with --enable-llvm=/path\to\llvm-2.6/, but, still the same problerm, and there's no files missed reported in the error message, such as "lvm/System/DataTypes.h", in the file system including /usr/include and ~/llvm/llvm-2.6/include/. May these files should be generated during llvm-2.6 building? I have compiled llvm-2.6 successfully and installed it i...
2009 Nov 05
5
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc-4.2-2.6 build failed,
I try to build llvm-gcc-4.2-2.6.source before build and install llvm-2.6, the configure is shown bellow ../llvm-gcc-4.2/configure --prefix=/home/ts/program/ --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/ts/llvm/llvm-2.6 --enable-languages=c,c++ where, it is the path where llvm-2.6 source is stored, -enable-llvm=/home/ts/llvm/llvm-2.6 the "make" gave error message as bellow:
1998 Nov 06
0
NT; Samba logs user on as 'nobody' on reboot?
...before on this list. I'm running SAMBA 1.9.18p10 on a FreeBSD 2.2.6 box with a mix of Win9x and NT clients. Now, the Win9x boxes have no problems in mounting their drives but the NT machines all experience problems on their first initial connection. My particular question is, are there known problerms with logging into SAMBA when an NT box is configured for auto-logon? It would appear as though SAMBA (or NT?) logs the box in as 'nobody' on a reboot. This creates a few problems for various applications as permissions are no longer valid for 'nobody.' In order to get things back...
2008 Jun 02
2
problems with netback
hi I've some problems with netback 1.what's mmap_pages for, which come from balloon operation ? mmap_pages = alloc_empty_pages_and_pagevec(MAX_PENDING_REQS) 2.what's the meaning of "refcnt" defined in netif_t (netif->refcnt) 3.irq enable and disable such as disable_irq(netif->irq); why netback use such enable & disable operations while netfront dont use for its
2002 Jun 18
0
Re : Re: performance problem ??? AN ANSWER PLEASE ...
Did someone of you find a solution for our problerm ??? I send you the documented as you asked it but I always got the same problems. I tried some possibilites for optimizing my system but I always stay with my problem for writing files. Reading files from my shares is not a problem but writing causes "buffers" problems with windows and w...
1998 Nov 07
1
SAMBA digest 1867
...gt;I'm running SAMBA 1.9.18p10 on a FreeBSD 2.2.6 box with a mix of Win9x and >NT clients. Now, the Win9x boxes have no problems in mounting their drives >but the NT machines all experience problems on their first initial >connection. > >My particular question is, are there known problerms with logging into >SAMBA when an NT box is configured for auto-logon? > >It would appear as though SAMBA (or NT?) logs the box in as 'nobody' on a >reboot. This creates a few problems for various applications as permissions >are no longer valid for 'nobody.' In orde...