search for: privilieged

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "privilieged".

Did you mean: privileged
2010 Sep 23
1
net rpc SeDiskOperatorPrivilege failing for domain user
Dear experts, I am having following problem on samba server side . please help me . 1) our device is running with samba server , in order to allow Microsoft windows mmc to change samba share permissions I am giving SeDiskOperatorPrivilege ( net rpc rights grant admin SeDiskOperatorPrivilege) privilege to samba users. This is working fine as long as our device is in standalone work group
2015 Apr 19
2
Possible Security Hole (Bug?)
Hi Andrey, 2015-04-19 0:12 GMT+02:00 Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex.ru>: > Greetings, Davor Vusir! > >>> Hi, there are two separate points of view here, map 'Administrator' to the >>> 'root' user, or give 'Administrator' a uidNumber. If you do the first then >>> 'Administrator' can change directory settings on a Unix
2005 Feb 19
0
[PATCH]: uidswap.c: Drop uid 0 check on Cygwin
...account which is going to log in. The below patch fixes that. Could somebody please check it in? I guess I asked this question already at least twice, but would it hurt OpenSSH badly if it would drop the tests for uid == 0 and instead call a function which checks the current account for being a privilieged account? This could be very simple on most UNIX derivates like this: int privileged_user () { return geteuid () == 0; } and much more complicated on systems needing that. On Cygwin we could check for the SE_CREATE_TOKEN_NAME privilege in the current access token on NT and just return 1 on 9x...
2015 Apr 19
0
Possible Security Hole (Bug?)
On 19/04/15 06:53, Davor Vusir wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > 2015-04-19 0:12 GMT+02:00 Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex.ru>: >> Greetings, Davor Vusir! >> >>>> Hi, there are two separate points of view here, map 'Administrator' to the >>>> 'root' user, or give 'Administrator' a uidNumber. If you do the first then
2015 Apr 18
2
Possible Security Hole (Bug?)
2015-04-17 10:01 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 16/04/15 19:26, David Willis wrote: >> >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> Forgive me if I am not understanding correctly, but.. >> >> I have heard conflicting reports about whether or not to assign UID to >> DOM\administrator, even from threads read on these lists :)