Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "privilieged".
Did you mean:
privileged
2010 Sep 23
1
net rpc SeDiskOperatorPrivilege failing for domain user
Dear experts,
I am having following problem on samba server side . please help me .
1) our device is running with samba server , in order to allow Microsoft windows mmc to change samba share permissions I am giving SeDiskOperatorPrivilege ( net rpc rights grant admin SeDiskOperatorPrivilege) privilege to samba users.
This is working fine as long as our device is in standalone work group
2015 Apr 19
2
Possible Security Hole (Bug?)
Hi Andrey,
2015-04-19 0:12 GMT+02:00 Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex.ru>:
> Greetings, Davor Vusir!
>
>>> Hi, there are two separate points of view here, map 'Administrator' to the
>>> 'root' user, or give 'Administrator' a uidNumber. If you do the first then
>>> 'Administrator' can change directory settings on a Unix
2005 Feb 19
0
[PATCH]: uidswap.c: Drop uid 0 check on Cygwin
...account
which is going to log in.
The below patch fixes that. Could somebody please check it in?
I guess I asked this question already at least twice, but would it
hurt OpenSSH badly if it would drop the tests for uid == 0 and instead
call a function which checks the current account for being a privilieged
account? This could be very simple on most UNIX derivates like this:
int
privileged_user ()
{
return geteuid () == 0;
}
and much more complicated on systems needing that. On Cygwin we could
check for the SE_CREATE_TOKEN_NAME privilege in the current access token
on NT and just return 1 on 9x...
2015 Apr 19
0
Possible Security Hole (Bug?)
On 19/04/15 06:53, Davor Vusir wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> 2015-04-19 0:12 GMT+02:00 Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex.ru>:
>> Greetings, Davor Vusir!
>>
>>>> Hi, there are two separate points of view here, map 'Administrator' to the
>>>> 'root' user, or give 'Administrator' a uidNumber. If you do the first then
2015 Apr 18
2
Possible Security Hole (Bug?)
2015-04-17 10:01 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>:
> On 16/04/15 19:26, David Willis wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the reply.
>>
>> Forgive me if I am not understanding correctly, but..
>>
>> I have heard conflicting reports about whether or not to assign UID to
>> DOM\administrator, even from threads read on these lists :)