Displaying 20 results from an estimated 14787 matches for "privileged".
2016 Jul 27
2
Cannot find invalid DNS entry
Hello,
when I run
> samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names -d10
it gives me the following output:
> INFO: Current debug levels:
> all: 10
> tdb: 10
> printdrivers: 10
> lanman: 10
> smb: 10
> rpc_parse: 10
> rpc_srv: 10
> rpc_cli: 10
> passdb: 10
> sam: 10
> auth: 10
> winbind: 10
> vfs: 10
> idmap: 10
> quota: 10
2016 Jul 27
2
Cannot find invalid DNS entry
On 27/07/16 13:40, mathias dufresne wrote:
> Two files are hosting DNS data:
> /path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb and
> /path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=FORESTDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb
>
> DNS entries are sometimes (often? always?) base64 encoded. You should be
> able to "grep" for string these files with:
> ldbsearch --show-binary -H
>
2014 Feb 09
1
classicupgrade error
Hi all.
I'm doing an upgrade from samba 3.4.8 domain to samba 4.1
I followed this guide:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/samba-tool/domain/classicupgrade/HOWTO
I'm upgrading on a new virtual server (for testing purposes).
Executing the command /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain
classicupgrade --dbdir=/root/samba3/ --use-xattrs=yes /root/smb.conf
(where /root/samba3/ contains
2007 Dec 10
0
diferents events between ast1.2 & ast1.4 ??
Hi all,
I'm new in the list, and I have a problem upgrading from asterisk 1.2 to
asterisk 1.4:
There is a diference from asterisk1.2 to asterisk1.4 in AMI events.
When I do a call to a queue (with the same extensions.conf dial plan)
with ast1.2 and ast1.4, in ast1.2 apper 3 newcallerid event in ast1.4
apper only 2.
It is normal? anyone knows it? what is the reason?
I
2018 Jul 23
4
sysvolreset error '{Operation Failed} The requested operation was unsuccessful.'
When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset on my "secondary" Samba AD DC I
get the error:
---
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823, '{Operation Failed}
The requested operation was unsuccessful.')
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
line 176, in _run
return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
File
2024 Mar 25
1
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID error
Hello everyone,
I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second
system which should work as file share (filesrv01).
I was setting it up using this manual:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
Somehow, I broke the administrator's account. After I set up a test
share, I got RPC server unavailable errors. I started investigating and
2016 Dec 20
2
Unable to convert first SID ( user DOMAIN\Administrator )
Hai,
! this problem came and is gone again but its an intresting thing thats why im putting it on the samba list.
I added time in the message to make more clear when what is done.
Upgrade samba from 4.4.5-3 to 4.5.3 yesterday.
Time : 10:15 in the morning.
Environment:
DC1 : debian Jessie samba 4.5.3
DC2 : debian Jessie samba 4.5.3
MEMBERs : in general samba 4.5.3 ( few
2016 Jul 27
0
Cannot find invalid DNS entry
Two files are hosting DNS data:
/path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb and
/path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=FORESTDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb
DNS entries are sometimes (often? always?) base64 encoded. You should be
able to "grep" for string these files with:
ldbsearch --show-binary -H
/path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=FORESTDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb | grep "what you
want"
2013 Sep 04
2
dns update failt (kerberos)
Hi there,
I am struggling with samba4 and the internal dns and kerberos.
It seems that DNS is the problem.
When I aske for kerberos dns entrys on my workstation, I get this
(11.22.33.202 is the samba4 server):
root at lit2:~# dig _kerberos._udp.DOMAIN.LOCAL @11.22.33.202
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> _kerberos._udp.DOMAIN.LOCAL @11.22.33.202
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got
2016 Jul 27
0
Cannot find invalid DNS entry
What would have better I reckon would have been to explain...
We should not _write_ directly into these files because, as Andrew
explained months ago, the change would not be replicated if applied
directly on these files. To have changes replicated the change MUST be
applied on sam.ldb file which is a wrapper.
Sharing or not sharing, that is the question : )
2016-07-27 14:51 GMT+02:00 Rowland
2012 Oct 11
0
samba4 second dc:s sysvol rights
I have a samba4 domain with two r/w directory controllers.
Second servers sysvol share doesn't allow access to normal users, only
admin users can access share.
Problem is same with both: ntvfs and s3fs.
Sysvolreset doesn't help and sysvolcheck doesn't complain anything.
posix file acls are identical with the first server which works ok.
I have granted rights for Everyone, specific
2006 Feb 23
4
MySQL Duplicate Key Error
I am a newbie and I am running into a problem which I cant understand. I
have a table called ''privileges'' which has the following fields
CREATE TABLE `sdqualplanner`.`privileges` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
`name` varchar(20) NOT NULL default '''',
`description` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '''',
`section_id`
2016 Oct 27
6
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:52:09 -0400
Ryan Ashley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Slightly off-topic, but I thought setting those set the limits for
> going into the NIS attributes tab in Windows. I understood the Samba
> wiki to explain that using those lines is how you set the upper and
> lower limits that Windows sees and uses. Is this incorrect?
>
> Lead
2024 Mar 25
1
NT_STATUS_INVALID_SID error
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 07:39:21 +0100
Kai via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a Samba setup with an AD controller (DC01) and set up a second
> system which should work as file share (filesrv01).
> I was setting it up using this manual:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs
>
> Somehow, I broke
2006 Jan 15
2
new objects and new associations in same view
Hello All,
I generated scaffolding for my Users table and setup my additional
models with their associations. I want to be able to create a new user,
and its associated groups and privileges from the same view. My
relationships are as follows:
users:
has_and_belongs_to_many :groups
has_many :privileges
groups:
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
privileges:
belongs_to :user
Right
2003 Jun 16
1
GroupMap : 'Privilege >> No privilege'
Hello,
I'm using Samba3Beta1 and i try to map group.
I create a posix group in my ldap:
dn: cn=Administrateurs du domaine,ou=Groups,dc=middleearth,dc=ring
objectClass: posixGroup
cn: Administrateurs du domaine
memberUid: root
memberUid: administrateur
gidNumber: 1000
And I try to map this group with the nt group : Domain Admins
net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins"
2011 Feb 21
2
problem joining WinXP machine to samba PDC+LDAP environment
Hello,
I can't join a winxp box to my samba domain. I just have one samba
server, meant to act as a PDC for domain='CHI'.
Any ideas how to troubleshoot and/or remedy?
Thanks,
Jon
Context:
------------
samba v3.3.8 on CentOS v5.5, using ldapsam backend. Domainname ='CHI'.
smbldap-tools v0.9.6.
I 'populated' the ldap with 'smbldap-populate'.
I try to join
2016 May 22
2
[samba_upgradedns] Error parsing DNS data
...; 20 minutes
T01D01 A 172.16.32.18
T01D02 A 172.16.32.70
THSRV01WIN A 192.168.0.18
$TTL 86400 ; 1 day
XRX9C934E2E4493 A 192.168.0.36
--
This message (and any associated files) may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized
to receive this for the intended recipient, you must not use, copy,
disclose or take any action based on this message or any information
herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the
sender immediately by s...
2018 Jul 23
0
sysvolreset error '{Operation Failed} The requested operation was unsuccessful.'
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:30:11 +0200
"Ing. Claudio Nicora via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset on my "secondary" Samba AD DC
> I get the error:
>
> ---
> ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741823, '{Operation
> Failed} The requested operation was unsuccessful.')
> File
2016 Jul 28
2
Cannot find invalid DNS entry
So no one has an idea what I can try additionally?
Thanks,
Tim
On 27.07.2016 16:54, mathias dufresne wrote:
> What would have better I reckon would have been to explain...
>
> We should not _write_ directly into these files because, as Andrew
> explained months ago, the change would not be replicated if applied
> directly on these files. To have changes replicated the change MUST