Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "prioriy".
Did you mean:
priority
2005 May 15
1
Old DBGet/DBPut vs. new Set(var=${DB(...
...0") in new stack
-- Executing Playback("SIP/ipp100-1d45", "auth-thankyou") in new
stack
as abviously DB(CFIM/200) always get replaced by its value which in
this instance doesn't exist yet
the other serious problem is that DBGet used to automatically jump to
prioriy n+101 if the entry didn't exist. Now I will do things like:
Set(temp=${DB(CFIM/200)})
which will set temp to "" instead of jumping to an error.
I wish DBGet and DBPut weren't removed their replacements are no good
and can't be made to behave the same without serious re-work...
2006 Jan 08
2
HTB - not borrowing, not exceeding rate
...orking.
What I want:
.---------------------------------.
| 1:1 rate = ceil = link bandwidth|
`---------------------------------''
| |
.--------------------. .-------------------------.
| 1:6666 p2p traffic | | 1:6667 Internet traffic |
| low priority in | | high prioriy in |
| badwidth sharing: | | bandwidth sharing: |
| ceil =~ from 1:1 | | ceil =~ from 1:1 |
| rate = small | | rate = (from1:1)-1:6666 |
`--------------------'' `-------------------------''
|
+-- 1:2 user...
2004 Jun 17
19
HTB is nor fair when ''borrowing? Can someone correct me or maybe Devik''s HTB has a bug?
Hello there!
Yesterday I started my experiments with HTB.
I configured it this way:
1: root HTB qdisc
|
1:1 HTB class rate 1000kbit
|
/-------+------\
1:40 1:50 1:60
user1 user2 user3
rate 333 & ceil 1000 for everyone.
User2 is disconnected and user1 and user3 are downloading.
For all the time (t1-t5) there are ONLY these two users downloading!
HTB should give