search for: priority

Here's the terminal output. Please notice there are 3 fixme's fixme:imm:ImmGetOpenStatus (0x15b1f8): semi-stub fixme:secur32:schan_InitializeSecurityContextW Using hardcoded "NORMAL" priority fixme:secur32:schan_InitializeSecurityContextW Using hardcoded "NORMAL" priority fixme:secur32:schan_InitializeSecurityContextW Using hardcoded "NORMAL" priority fixme:secur32:schan_InitializeSecurityContextW Using hardcoded "NORMAL" priority fixme:secur32:schan_Initia...

...-venu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The components associated with a link or flow, such as Soft Ring Sets, Soft Rings and squeues, have kernel threads processing inbound/outbound packets. The scheduler processes threads based on a thread''s priority level. The priority level of a thread determine how it is scheduled w.r.t other kernel threads. Thus by assigning a priority to a link/flow, we can control how the threads associated with that link/flow is processed w.r.t other link/flows. When the system is busy, threads with higher priority wil...

...hat's happening here: i have a pap2 and an spa941. everytime i call my spa from my pap2 i can see it being added dynamically on the regcontext: [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Saved useragent "Linksys/SPA942-5.2.8" for peer 100100 [Oct 7 11:59:08] -- Added extension '100100' priority 1 to sipregcontext but from spa to pap2 i dont see it, i looked at the difference on the config, under SIP: On PAP2: Handle VIA received: yes Handle VIA rport: yes Insert VIA received: yes Insert VIA rport: yes STUN Enable: yes STUN Test Enable: On SPA: Handle VIA received: no Handle VIA...

...40m [0;37;40m[[1;37;40mres_parking.so[0;37;40m] => ([33;40mCall Parking Resource[0;37;40m) [1;30;40m == [0;37;40mParsing '/etc/asterisk/parking.conf': Found [1;30;40m -- [0;37;40mRegistered extension context 'parkedcalls' [1;30;40m -- [0;37;40mAdded extension '701' priority 1 to parkedcalls [1;30;40m -- [0;37;40mAdded extension '702' priority 1 to parkedcalls [1;30;40m -- [0;37;40mAdded extension '703' priority 1 to parkedcalls [1;30;40m -- [0;37;40mAdded extension '704' priority 1 to parkedcalls [1;30;40m -- [0;37;40mAdded extensio...

Genec, your approach is also very insteresting, but I would like to present an alternative which will basically works with three priority states. ALTERNATIVE APPROACH: FILTER AND PRIORITIES ON PRINT. ----- Detail: Lower the priority number higher the importance of the message. ----- - default priority level: * Messages without a prefix will *always* take this priority level. ----- - debug priority level: * Messages with prior...

"The upstream maintainer of yum, Seth Vidal, had the following to say about 'yum priorities' in September 2009: Gosh, I hope people do not set up yum priorities. There are so many things about priorities that make me cringe all over. It could just be that it reminds me of apt 'pinning' and that makes me want to hurl." This note was placed on the wiki

Can someone shed some light on why the 'hint' feature was implemented in the 'priority' field that is purely an integer in the rest of the dialplan? There seems to be a conflict with realtime and the hint priority, in order to put in the hints you would have to change the priority column in the database from int to char and give up some performance (since int indexes better a...

Hello, I have a question about working principles of yum. Here are the details: Installed package: GeoIP.i386 1.4.4-1.el5.centos Repo: CentOS Extras Priority for CentOS Extras repo: 1 "yum update" wants to replace the above package with the following: Package: geoip.i386 1.4.5-1.el5.rf Repo: rpmforge Priority for rpmforge: 15 And yes, the following is already in the priorities.conf [main] enabled=1 Why does yum try to replace the package f...

In the yum priorities page on the wiki Akemi Yagi suggests http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities [base], [addons], [updates], [extras] ... priority=1 [centosplus],[contrib] ... priority=2 Third Party Repos ... priority=N (where N is > 10 and based on your preference) If you have rpmforge, kbs, epel all set up at 10 then wouldn't those also potentially overwrite each other if the same package exists in all of them? Who has got se...

...cuuming is disabled for persistent database registry.tdb 2014/02/26 11:58:55.986739 [6553670]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent database secrets.tdb 2014/02/26 11:58:56.034569 [6553670]: Vacuuming is disabled for persistent database share_info.tdb 2014/02/26 11:58:56.034715 [6553670]: Freeze priority 1 2014/02/26 11:58:56.040888 [6553670]: Freeze priority 2 2014/02/26 11:58:56.043987 [6553670]: Freeze priority 3 2014/02/26 11:58:56.437970 [6553670]: Freeze priority 1 2014/02/26 11:58:56.438152 [6553670]: Freeze priority 2 2014/02/26 11:58:56.438292 [6553670]: Freeze priority 3 2014/02/26 11:58:...

I''m struggling understanding the model view of a combined model. Take the following: class P4 < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :p4_priorities end I figured out the naming and referencing of the sub models (i.e. P4.p4_priorities - seems simple enough but I had weird issues related to it). I''m all ok except that I am having issues with how to reference a

I''m working on a bugtracker application in rails. I have a Bug model and I want to add a Priority to the mix. A Bug can have one priority. I generate a Priority model, modify my Bug model with a belongs_to :priority and create my migration like so: class CreatePriorities < ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up create_table :priorities do |t| t.column :name, :string, :limit =&gt...

...just released a new perl-DBD-mysql for el4 that has an obsoletes against perl-DBD-MySQL and the protectbase yum plugin doesn't grok obsoletes. the priorities plugin does. so if you are having issues with this, install the yum-plugin-priorities first, make sure that the CentOS-Base repo is priority 1 and the rpmforge repo is priority 2 or higher (99 is the default). also, i'd like to suggest that the priorities plugin be made added to the base install and that the centos-base repos be configured with priority 1. it looks like c4 has the priority setting, but c5 doesn't and neither...

Hi, Is it not ok to use both plugins at the same time? I have read from the wiki page of centos that you must use only either protect base or priorities plugin. I have been using the the config file below for months and did not encounter any problems. I used priority=1 and protect=1 on base and updates (addons,extras protect=1 ; set no priorities) for the CentOS-Base repo and on the rpmforge repo I used protect=0 and did not set any priority. Should I enable only one (protect base or priorities) and not both? Thanks. [base] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base mirro...

Hi, Sorry to bother you all. I have a typical problem sharing DSL upstream bandwidth with users. I have 3 types of traffic high-priority, medium-priority and low priority. My upstream rate is 960kbits. Traffic (any priority) can vary in bandwidth from 0 to 960kbits. I have a test setup where I can pump 600kbit of high priority sustained and I have 400kbit of low priority traffic sustained. I expect after the 600kbit high-priority tr...

subject: ssh non-intuitive logging setting (priority names). I installed openssh 2.3.0p1 on Solaris 7 for x86 box and sshd worked fine. However, somehow the logging of connection and disconnection to sshd was not recorded as I wished. Time to investigate. On a host where sshd from data-fellows once ran, the log was recorded with auth.info level....

...;s a security update for libmodplug: This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package. This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on 2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574, CVE-2011-1761). I've the following priorities configured: priority = 1 [base] priority = 1 [extras] priority = 1 [updates] priority = 2 [centosplus] priority = 2 [contrib] priority = 10 [adobe-linux-x86_64] priority = 13 [epel] priority = 16 [rpmforge] priority = 16 [rpmforge-extras] priority = 19 [rpmfusion-nonfree-updates] I got this conflict: Setting up Updat...

I'm following the instructions on this URL http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RT_3.4.x_On_CentOS_4.x and came across the part that said "WARNING: RT overwrites some packages from the base distribution, especially mod_perl" How exactly do I "protect" the RT repository? It links to the "ProtectBase" program http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/ProtectBase

Hi I tried to install the * in my Radhat 7.3 machine. The "gmake" and "gmake install" went fine, but "gmake sample" gave me errors of "configs/*.adsi", "sounds/demo-*" and "sounds/*.mp3" errors. I created a dummy.adsi in the configs folder and commented out the "sounds/demo-*" and "sounds/*.mp3" in the Makefile to