search for: priorisation

Thanks for the suggestion, C F, but the problem is there is a rather big database application behind with many users, so a static configuration is not suitable for my needs. i am working mostly with realtime and agi. regards, roland -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of C F Sent: Sunday, July 03,

Hello, I''m using Linux kernel 2.6.x and tc (from iproute2 package). I''m trying to use HTB or HFSC scheduler in order to limite the rate of outgoing packets and also in order to minimiez delay for RTP stream. But I didn''t suceed in having this 2 QoS services working. I use Iptables in order to classify packets. Here is my HFSC conf. In fact the pings that i send from

Hi, Our company''s main line is quite busy the whole day and my shaping is working perfect, however even if I give icmp priority the pings still jump around quite a bit. We do have a backup line which hardly get used only if the main line drops. I''ve set ip rule to route all icmp through that and now the pings are perfect. Will this make a difference for the game players etc,

Is it possible to have multiple file paths defined for a single module in the fileserver.conf? For example [files] path /first/path/files path /second/path/files allow * [modules] allow * [plugins] allow * The here described configuration did not work as i tried it already. Any idea if this is possible. Thanks a lot Christian -- You received this message because you are

Hi All, I've a single 1.2.17 Asterisk system. Gradwell here in the UK is used for PSTN calls via IAX2. Our 'net link is a dedicated 2Mb fibre connection (of which we have ever used 50% max bandwidth). We've no E1/T1 links, everything is IP based. My boss complains that many of the calls he holds with others has a bad quality. He also says that its not just him. My iax.conf file

On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:50, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 28/10/2016 16:28, Valeri Galtsev ha scritto: >> On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> > Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >> > > For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >> > > - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >> > > -

Hi Yamaban, Great expalanation. I think you know how to buy an ssd. There is no doubt about samsung ssds quality vs other. My question about neutron was to get your opinion about this product. My doubt was about differences between slc, mlc and tlc. Mlc endurance respect tlc is better and I though that the mlc of neutron gives me more endurance respect to the tlc. From a technic point of view,

On Fri, October 28, 2016 2:42 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Il 27/10/2016 19:38, Yamaban ha scritto: >> For my personal use I would replace that Drive asap. >> - There is no warranty for it anymore (time since buy) >> - You can't buy it new anymore (discontinued) >> - There are more reliable drives available. >> >> I'd go for a Samsung Evo 850, that

Hi, I found that I had some thinking error with the wshaper script. I assigned the bandwith of my DSL connection to it, but the machine where it runs is normally connected to the LAN with 100Mbit behind a separate Hardware-Router.Obviously, the complete connection of the machine was slowed down to 384k because I told it so.I guess, since wshaper takes only one card as argument, I can''t