Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "primitve".
Did you mean:
primitive
1997 Feb 13
0
Avoiding setuid applications
...ist, and David Holland''s
suggestion for a utmp manager daemon got me thinking. I ended up coding
a sample program that demonstrates how a `resource manager'' can be used
to allow applications access to certain resources while not giving them
any privileges.
The sample program is a primitve modem manager that hands out open
file descriptors to modems. This is done by passing the file descriptor
over a UNIX domain socket.
The protocol also provides for some kind of authentication, but it''s
not really good. Recent 2.1 kernels provide SCM_CREDENTIALS passing,
which could be us...
2005 May 03
1
[LLVMdev] llvm control flow analysis?
I'm asking for a stepping stone to figure out how to get some control
flow analysis on llvm IR. I need to find out specificially sections of
if/else, for loops, and while loop locations in the original source
code. I can look at the Cbackend and look there, but would there be any
analysis code already written in your library that takes care of that.
2011 Nov 18
2
round() ignores missing arguments if it is used inside another function where some arguments are missing.
I have stumbled across some behaviour in R that I really can't place,
and that makes coding a bit tricky. I know that I can work around it
when explicitly checking for missing arguments, but still...
I have two functions. I have a first function based on paste
? ? fun1 <- function(x,y){
? ? ? print(missing(y))
? ? ? paste(x,'X',sep=y)
? ? }
If I try this function without
2004 Jun 26
1
S4 group "Math", "getGroupMembers", "genericForPrimitive"
Hi,
I found the following on Windows 2000/NT
R Version 1.9.1 (2004-06-21) (also Version 1.9.0):
The S4 group "Math" doesn't work as documented; i.e., "log", "log10",
"gamma" and "lgamma" are included
in the documentation but don't work. See example code below.
Moreover, what about 'genericForPrimitive' which is used
in
1997 Jul 09
1
R-beta: Problem with `rpois'
There is a problem with `rpois'. It does seem to take care about the
order of the arguments. This is an example:
> rpois(n=1,lambda=2)
[1] 3
> rpois(lambda=2,n=1)
[1] 2 0
It obviously uses the first argument as the number of samples to be
drawn, which is wrong.
I used Version 0.49 Beta (April 23, 1997).
Fredrik
1997 Jul 09
1
R-beta: Problem with `rpois'
There is a problem with `rpois'. It does seem to take care about the
order of the arguments. This is an example:
> rpois(n=1,lambda=2)
[1] 3
> rpois(lambda=2,n=1)
[1] 2 0
It obviously uses the first argument as the number of samples to be
drawn, which is wrong.
I used Version 0.49 Beta (April 23, 1997).
Fredrik
2006 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
> thanks for your reply.
Sorry for the delay, I've been buried in email lately.
>>> When translating a complex c application to llvm bytecodes, some
>>> semantics are lost:
>>>
>> LLVM 1.6 and the "new front-end" already handle this right. Here's the
>> bugzilla bug corresponding to it:
>>
2004 Apr 25
7
R vs Matlab: which is more "programmer friendly"?
Hi,
The department of economics at our university (Budapest) is planning a
course on numerical methods in economics. They are trying to decide
which software to use for that, and I would like to advocate R. The
other alternative is Matlab.
I have found comparisons in terms of computational time for matrix
algebra, but I don't think that is relevant: the bottleneck for
economists is usually
2006 Feb 24
5
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
hi Chris!
thanks for your reply.
First of all I did not know about the history with the Annotation stuff.
Annotable for me was a way how one could realize this things. So as I
see it right now - it is more that Annotable will completly vanish soon.
This is interesting to me.
Chris Lattner schrieb:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jakob Praher wrote:
>
>> When translating a complex c