search for: preupgrading

Hello! Just thought I'd present this problem for comment/help/hints: * want to upgrade from Fedora Core 11 to 13 * I have a 64-bit system with Vista as a host o/s, running VMWare, and FC11 as a client o/s * cloned my FC11 as a backup * ran preupgrade, got expected problem with 200MB /boot, but preupgrade said that it could continue downloading (presumably to the larger partition) so I did

> No, there is no automated way to move from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7 .. and > we have no idea what will be in CentOS-8 until Red Hat releases RHEL-8. > We have no idea what will be in CentOS-6.11 until Red Hat releases > RHEL-6.11 .. and we have no idea what will be in the release of CentOS-7 > until Red Hat releases RHEL-7.6 .. literally, we take the source code > they release ..

Is the https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool still not recommend? Is there a expected time when it will be working? Thanks, Jerry

Hello Everyone, I have been trying to get a Fedora 12 domU to boot for the better part of the afternoon and haven't had success booting any F12 kernel in Xen. I can get Fedora 11 installed no problem, tried to do a preupgrade but the when booting the preupgrade kernel through grub (or even from outside the domU) the domU reboots very quickly and ultimately crashes. As far as I saw in the

Hi I've reviewed and am performing some tests for the V6 to V7 preupgrade assistant. I have some suggestions for the wiki page. I have started a google doc with some suggested additions. They will most likely be added to as I discuss stuff with the dev mailing list. Whoever is responsible for maintaining the upgrade guide page on the wiki, could you give me some feedback please. Here's

Question 1: has anyone used preupgrade (I used it with fc 17 -> 19, and it pretty much appeared to work, but that was on a couple of worksttions)? Opinions? Question 2: is grub still supported, or is there something that *FORCES* you to use grub2? mark "grub2 must DIE!"

>> No, there is no automated way to move from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7 .. and >> we have no idea what will be in CentOS-8 until Red Hat releases RHEL-8. >> We have no idea what will be in CentOS-6.11 until Red Hat releases >> RHEL-6.11 .. and we have no idea what will be in the release of CentOS-7 >> until Red Hat releases RHEL-7.6 .. literally, we take the source code

On 05/09/2016 05:21 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > Is the https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool > still not recommend? > > Is there a expected time when it will be working? I personally would never do an in place upgrade on a production machine. Call it a personal bias. The versions we have released do not work .. there are updates that need to be refactored and rolled

On 2 Jun 2017 09:45, "Gianluca Cecchi" <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: Il 01 Giu 2017 10:13 PM, "Jerry Geis" <jerry.geis at gmail.com> ha scritto: I found this site https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CentOSUpgradeTool Is this still the case - there is no upgrade path from 6 to 7 ? I have a few remote servers I'd like to upgrade (if possible).

Hi, I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other operating systems. Right now, I am sure that we do not have proper update path in CentOS to move from one version to another. -- Thanks & Regards, Venkateswara Rao Dokku.

Greetings, I *do* still have an FC2 box. Would anyone second this procedure: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=14052&forum=37&post_id=47945 Thanks. Max Pyziur pyz at brama.com

On 18.10.2018 00:08, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The bottom line .. we don't make the decision whether or not to use > systemd or not. We rebuild RHEL source code. will there come a CentOS 6.11 which will be capable of TLS1.3 or HTTP/2? I'm sure there will come a CentOS 8, but when is it probable to be released? one of the most important things (for me), as I already noticed there will

Niki Kovacs wrote: > Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit : >> What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size >> in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume >> will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset >> raid5 at the time a mount point is created (raid5 is set after the >> fact),

On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from > CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other operating > systems. > > Right now, I am sure that we do not have proper update path in CentOS to > move from one version to another. > If you mean upgrade to all

I have a vague recollection--from several years back--there was once a script out there that could be run on a CentOS 6.x system to test its hardware compatibility for CentOS 7. (Not talking about a script to actually do any upgrade; just check a system's hardware.) Does anyone remember this? Remember the details? Thanks. -- Tim Evans |5 Chestnut Court 443-394-3864 |Owings Mills, MD

I am setting up a Centos 6.5 box to host some Openvz containers. I have a 120gb SSD I am going to use for boot, / and swap. Should allow for fast boots. Have a 4TB drive I am going to mount as /backup and use to move container backups too etc. The remaining four 3TB drives I am putting in a software RAID 10 array and mount as /vz and all the containers will go there. It will have by far the

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:20 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Niki Kovacs wrote: >> Le 18/02/2015 23:12, >> close, but then, for mysterious reasons, Red Hat decided to cripple it >> into oblivion. Go figure. > > One word: desktop. That's what they want to conquer next. OK well there's a really long road to get to that pie in the sky. I don't see it

>> What size is recommended for the /boot partition? After doing a fresh >> install and lengthy backup restore I realized I only made it 200M. Is >> this going to be a problem? > > Mine was about 500 MB and I removed some kernels because I got a warning the > partition was getting full. > > With only two kernels installed, 182 MB are used. I would suggest 1 GB

Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit : > What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size > in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume > will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset > raid5 at the time a mount point is created (raid5 is set after the > fact), there isn't a clear way to say "use

On 19.02.2015 06:28, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:20 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> Niki Kovacs wrote: >>> Le 18/02/2015 23:12, > >>> close, but then, for mysterious reasons, Red Hat decided to cripple it >>> into oblivion. Go figure. >> >> One word: desktop. That's what they want to conquer next. > > OK