search for: pretenses

At 12:31 PM 10/11/2001 +1000, you wrote: >On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Jon Drukman wrote: > > > ok this has to be FAQ #1 but it's not in my FAQ file... > > > > how do i get it so going to my server (http://pretension.com:8000/) starts > > an mp3 player streaming instead of opening up a 51M download window? > >You don't. It doesn't work like that. The

ok this has to be FAQ #1 but it's not in my FAQ file... how do i get it so going to my server (http://pretension.com:8000/) starts an mp3 player streaming instead of opening up a 51M download window? anybody got a nice site with lots of fancy stuff like playlists and such? i want to look at it to get some ideas... i'd like a log of what was played. this has to be fairly basic

On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote: > On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: >> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source >> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). > > I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a > goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate > information about the AST,

Hi all, I'm new here and would very much appreciate any help you can give me. We are running a rather outdated mail server that until recently has been running beautifully. Under the pretense of "it is ain't broke, don't fix it" it hasn't been updated so is running Fedora Core 4 and dovecot v0.99.14. What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they

Hi Daniel,   Thanks for your help.   You mentioned that "the current interpreter makes no pretense of running on a "virtual machine"", but isn't the interpreter itself a virtual machine? I'm not looking to emulate any particular processor - just interested in a tool that will help teach how a processor works.   Can LLVM help, or am I completely off track?   Thanks, M.

Hi Michael, On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Michael McDonnell < michaeldmcdonnell at yahoo.com> wrote: > > > My assumption has been that LLVM generates machine code for a virtual > machine, and that you supply an interpreter that will execute the code. > The name can be somewhat confusing. LLVM is a lot of things, the web page gives some important areas (http://llvm.org/).

I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). ether On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote: > Will this allow users to compile C++ (or some other language that LLVM > has a frontend for) to C, which then can be compiled using a C compiler > for a target architecture, for which only

On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: > I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source > transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate information about the AST, and conversion to LLVM IR is way too lossy. Signedness, for example, is

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Jon Drukman wrote: > ok this has to be FAQ #1 but it's not in my FAQ file... > > how do i get it so going to my server (http://pretension.com:8000/) starts > an mp3 player streaming instead of opening up a 51M download window? You don't. It doesn't work like that. The browser won't launch an app until the given file is downloaded which, for a

On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote: > On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote: >> On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: >>> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source >>> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). >> >> I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should

I think LLVM is capable of what you're asking, but it isn't really a goal of the project, and thus might require you to put in a fair amount of work yourself to get there. LLVM is targeted much more at the compiler side of things...it makes a great educational tool in that domain, but the virtual instruction set is tailored more to the needs of compiler front-ends, optimizers, and code

On 7 May 2003 at 20:14, Michael Smith wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2003 19:34, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today we came across the idea of adding an external > > authentification- module for listening to icecast2. There have > > recently been talks with artists and music labels that they would > > like to receive "a small fee" per

Hello all. I just joined the list, because I am interested in NUA features of Samba3. I got the MySQL passdb backend working, but it still requires a Unix System account. I need to use fully virtualized user accounts. Re: the release of Samba3 and NUA capabilities I have found this: <snip> In the development of Samba-3, a number of requests were received to provide the ability to

An amusing afterthought : What is a rival software (ahem!) was planting this, hoping for a divide between S and R communities.or at the very minimum hoping for some amusement. an assumption or even a pretense of stealing credit is one of the easiest ways of sparking intellectual discord Most users of softwares don't really care about who gets credit ( Who wrote Windows Vista ,or Mac OS or

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Backport of the following patch from development: # User Ian Campbell <[hidden email]> # Date 1309968705 -3600 # Node ID e4781aedf817c5ab36f6f3077e44c43c566a2812 # Parent 700d0f03d50aa6619d313c1ff6aea7fd429d28a7 libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy. This patch properly terminates the

> > Potentially a quite interesting feature. Shouldn't even be too > > difficult to integrate, really. I suspect that many (and possibly even > > most?) players won't support it, though. Worth spending an hour or two > > experimenting if you're interested in it, though. > > Okay, then how about simply adding it past the URL? Like > >

On 28.08.2012 14:47, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > On Aug 27, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote: > >> On 28.08.2012 14:08, Joshua Cranmer wrote: >>> On 8/27/2012 9:57 PM, Hongbin Zheng wrote: >>>> I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source >>>> transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). >>>

Hello all, Ive been playing with nnet (package 'nnet') and Ive come across this problem. nnet doesnt seems to like to have more than 1000 weights. If I do: > data(iris) > names(iris)[5] <- "species" > net <- nnet(species ~ ., data=iris, size=124, maxit=10) # weights: 995 initial value 309.342009 iter 10 value 21.668435 final value 21.668435 stopped after 10

I realized I missed this part of your email: Can LLVM help, or am I completely off track? > It isn't clear to me yet. I have used LLVM for a different but similar purpose, which effectively implements a stronger virtual machine on top of the LLVM IR. I have been very happy with the decision to use LLVM instead of, say, working with x86 directly. On the other hand, if you are only

I have to disagree on that. NATs is the problem and I am one of the causes of that problem as one of the principals behind RFC 1918. What has happened is that HTTP has become the transport for the Internet. Very bad in a number of ways. But for another time. Perhaps. Right now I have to deal with a new ISP that was on the road to static IPv6 when somehow the lead engineer kind of