search for: pretense

At 12:31 PM 10/11/2001 +1000, you wrote: >On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Jon Drukman wrote: > > > ok this has to be FAQ #1 but it's not in my FAQ file... > > > > how do i get it so going to my server (http://pretension.com:8000/) starts > > an mp3 player streaming instead of opening up a 51M download window? > >You don't. It doesn't work like that. The

ok this has to be FAQ #1 but it's not in my FAQ file... how do i get it so going to my server (http://pretension.com:8000/) starts an mp3 player streaming instead of opening up a 51M download window? anybody got a nice site with lots of fancy stuff like playlists and such? i want to look at it to get some ideas... i'd like a log of what was played. this has to be fairly basic

...Clang). > > I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a > goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate > information about the AST, and conversion to LLVM IR is way too lossy. > Signedness, for example, is lost at IR generation, as is any pretense of > machine independence. > Why is it not possible to have the C backend emit machine-independent code (i.e. C code that does not rely on implementation-defined behaviour)? Philipp

Hi all, I'm new here and would very much appreciate any help you can give me. We are running a rather outdated mail server that until recently has been running beautifully. Under the pretense of "it is ain't broke, don't fix it" it hasn't been updated so is running Fedora Core 4 and dovecot v0.99.14. What is happening is that as users log in (via thunderbird), they are shown the contents of their mailboxes. However, when they try and access a given email, they ge...

Hi Daniel,   Thanks for your help.   You mentioned that "the current interpreter makes no pretense of running on a "virtual machine"", but isn't the interpreter itself a virtual machine? I'm not looking to emulate any particular processor - just interested in a tool that will help teach how a processor works.   Can LLVM help, or am I completely off track?   Thanks, M. McD...

...ow much support you are expecting. The main benefit you are getting is precise semantics for LLVM IR and the tool chain for working with .bc files. This allows you to avoid dealing with many nitty particulars of x86 (assuming that is your target). On the other hand, the current interpreter makes no pretense of running on a "virtual machine", so if this is your goal you will need to build those facilities yourself. Finally, using LLVM IR directly may pose some issues depending on what level of precision you want. Since a significant amount of work is done in code generation for the particular...

I think the C backend also allow people performing source-to-source transform with LLVM (instead of Clang). ether On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk at spth.de> wrote: > Will this allow users to compile C++ (or some other language that LLVM > has a frontend for) to C, which then can be compiled using a C compiler > for a target architecture, for which only

...with LLVM (instead of Clang). I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate information about the AST, and conversion to LLVM IR is way too lossy. Signedness, for example, is lost at IR generation, as is any pretense of machine independence. -- Joshua Cranmer News submodule owner DXR coauthor

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Jon Drukman wrote: > ok this has to be FAQ #1 but it's not in my FAQ file... > > how do i get it so going to my server (http://pretension.com:8000/) starts > an mp3 player streaming instead of opening up a 51M download window? You don't. It doesn't work like that. The browser won't launch an app until the given file is downloaded which, for a

...t;> I do not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a >> goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate >> information about the AST, and conversion to LLVM IR is way too lossy. >> Signedness, for example, is lost at IR generation, as is any pretense of >> machine independence. >> > > Why is it not possible to have the C backend emit machine-independent > code (i.e. C code that does not rely on implementation-defined behaviour)? Because LLVM IR already includes that implementation-defined behaviour. Cameron

...ly used educationally as an introduction to machine architecture and code generation. On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Michael McDonnell <michaeldmcdonnell at yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for your help. > > You mentioned that "the current interpreter makes no pretense of running on > a "virtual machine"", but isn't the interpreter itself a virtual machine? > I'm not looking to emulate any particular processor - just interested in a > tool that will help teach how a processor works. > > Can LLVM help, or am I completely off t...

On 7 May 2003 at 20:14, Michael Smith wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2003 19:34, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > > Hi, > > > > today we came across the idea of adding an external > > authentification- module for listening to icecast2. There have > > recently been talks with artists and music labels that they would > > like to receive "a small fee" per

Hello all. I just joined the list, because I am interested in NUA features of Samba3. I got the MySQL passdb backend working, but it still requires a Unix System account. I need to use fully virtualized user accounts. Re: the release of Samba3 and NUA capabilities I have found this: <snip> In the development of Samba-3, a number of requests were received to provide the ability to

An amusing afterthought : What is a rival software (ahem!) was planting this, hoping for a divide between S and R communities.or at the very minimum hoping for some amusement. an assumption or even a pretense of stealing credit is one of the easiest ways of sparking intellectual discord Most users of softwares don't really care about who gets credit ( Who wrote Windows Vista ,or Mac OS or Ubuntu Linux), and the NYT is a newspaper not a journal. Does any student, or teacher for that matter care whet...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Backport of the following patch from development: # User Ian Campbell <[hidden email]> # Date 1309968705 -3600 # Node ID e4781aedf817c5ab36f6f3077e44c43c566a2812 # Parent 700d0f03d50aa6619d313c1ff6aea7fd429d28a7 libxl: attempt to cleanup tapdisk processes on disk backend destroy. This patch properly terminates the

...concert?session=abc10283kasld > > should work, right? Or are there cons against this? All we would have > to add is a "split at ?"-routine to icecast2. icecast already splits query parameters out like this. The 'against' would be that this doesn't even have a slight pretense of security, and it's really not a very nice way to do things when HTTP _does_ have proper authentication built in. But, you could try it out if you wanted (I'd still try using HTTP BASIC auth, to see if most clients support it, first). Mike --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www....

...not believe that this would be the case nor that it should be a >>> goal. Source-to-source transformation requires a lot of accurate >>> information about the AST, and conversion to LLVM IR is way too lossy. >>> Signedness, for example, is lost at IR generation, as is any pretense of >>> machine independence. >>> >> >> Why is it not possible to have the C backend emit machine-independent >> code (i.e. C code that does not rely on implementation-defined behaviour)? > > Because LLVM IR already includes that implementation-defined beha...

...our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. If we run into such debts, we must be taxed in our meat and drink, in our necessities and in our comforts, in our labor and in our amusements. If we can prevent the government from wasting the labor of the people, under the pretense of caring for them, they will be happy. -- Thomas Jefferson

...are expecting. The main benefit you are getting is precise > semantics for LLVM IR and the tool chain for working with .bc files. This > allows you to avoid dealing with many nitty particulars of x86 (assuming > that is your target). On the other hand, the current interpreter makes no > pretense of running on a "virtual machine", so if this is your goal you will > need to build those facilities yourself. Finally, using LLVM IR directly may > pose some issues depending on what level of precision you want. Since a > significant amount of work is done in code generation for...

I have to disagree on that. NATs is the problem and I am one of the causes of that problem as one of the principals behind RFC 1918. What has happened is that HTTP has become the transport for the Internet. Very bad in a number of ways. But for another time. Perhaps. Right now I have to deal with a new ISP that was on the road to static IPv6 when somehow the lead engineer kind of