search for: precend

...pful, it was somewhat hard to start due to the fact that I plan on using ocamllex and ocmalyacc and the tutorial hand rolls their own lexer and parser. I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex and ocamlyacc (the only thing I'm missing is the ability to assign precendence to user defined binary and unary operators), and was wondering if ther would be an interest in adding my code as supplimental material. Sincerely, Chris Wailes -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachmen...

...nfigured at it's very basic running natd through rl0 and allowing any to any connections from the lan to the outer world. Natd controls access to the lan. We have a 6.0 mb/s ADSL net connection for all the gaming clients to use, however if a gamer starts downloading a file, that file takes precendence and causes everyone's pings 'in-game' to sky rocket to unplayable levels. I have done some reading on DummyNet which is attached at the hip with IPFW, however I have been unsuccessful in getting it to work properly. I have done some research and found this site: http://info.ie...

On Tuesday 14 April 2009 01:29:44 Chris Wailes wrote: > I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex > and ocamlyacc (the only thing I'm missing is the ability to assign > precendence to user defined binary and unary operators), and was wondering > if ther would be an interest in adding my code as supplimental material. Yes! I thought it was a bit of a shame that so much precious LLVM tutorial space was devoted to lexing and parsing without using appropriate tools. You...

...see and write to the directory (even if the group permissions forbid writing). As far as I can tell, the SAMBA server is examining group permissions to determine visibility, but using the user permissions to determine actual read/write access. I'm not sure I understand why the group is taking precendence over the user permissions. If I log into the same Linux system and my permissions on a given directory are 0700, I, as the user, have full access to that directory. However, this is not the behavior I'm seeing when I connect via SAMBA. Can anyone shed some light on either 1) what I have m...

Full_Name: Allan Sims Version: 2.1.0 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (193.40.25.254) This should not be correct. It seams that first power is applied and then sign. > -2^2 [1] -4

I think I have a misunderstanding of variable scope in classes. Wy isn''t tfel4_ClusterDbType set in the elements::tfel4::elements class? It''s set in elements::tfel4::defaults but then goes *poof* when elements::tfel4::elements tries to access it. class elements::tfel4::defaults { if ( !$tfel4_ClusterDbType ) { $tfel4_ClusterDbType = "oracle" }

...PDC and BDC1) use used in preference to BDC2. I assume that something about BDC2 having a newer ver of samba is getting it priority. 2. What is wrong with the domain members in local users group. This may be a BDC config in general issue (and I just never found it because BDC1 never took precendence over PDC) or it may be something to do with Samba 3.4.x vs 3.0.x. Thanks

...; -- the "--delete" option in the command above makes it such that the said newer file is deleted on remote and the timestamp is reseted back to the old time stamp i.e. the one for the "tmp/" subdir on the local machine. Putting it shortly, the "--delete" option has precendence over "-u" option w.r.t. directories. Is it so that "-u" works only on files and not on directories ? IMHO the appropriate behaviour in a situation like the one described above directories on remote that have newer time stamp should be ignored and excluded from further pr...

Hi, We are looking for a calendar scheduling solution that supports recurring events. Some specific requirements are that we need to be able to setup recurring events, then modify one of those events on a certain day by deleting it for example. Basically, we want the back end for a Google Calender type functionality. Ive dug around in GitHub and there are tons of recurring plugins but not many

...t;-", "*", "/", still everything works fine. But, if we then define new methods for the whole group "Arith", the arithmetic methods of "distr" no longer work. (for more details see example code below) What are we missing? Moreover, there is a certain precendence; i.e., if one defines a single arithmetic method (e.g., "/") and alterwards defines a method for the whole group "Arith", the "old" method "/" remains valid. However, if we first define a method for the whole group "Arith" and afterwards def...

...rd to start due to the fact that I plan on using ocamllex and > ocmalyacc and the tutorial hand rolls their own lexer and parser. > > I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex > and ocamlyacc (the only thing I'm missing is the ability to assign > precendence to user defined binary and unary operators), and was wondering > if ther would be an interest in adding my code as supplimental material. Great! I'd be happy to add this, though I think as as an addendum instead of a replacement unless the community feels strongly about it. Since most o...

%=>% would have precendence ('order of operations') problems also. A + B %=>% C is equivalent to A + ( B %=>% C) and I don't think that is what you want. as.list(quote(A + B %=>% C)) shows the first branch in the parse tree. The following function, str.language, shows the entire parse tree,...

You are correct... No glare on a PRI W. Kevin Hunt CCIE #11841 www.huntbrothers.com -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steven Critchfield Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 3:26 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] "Glare" condition - How well does asteriskhandle?

I suppose it would work, although "=>" is rather a descriptive symbol and less a function. But choosing between quoting: "A + B => C" and a regular function: A + B %=>% C probably quoting is the most straightforward, as the result of the foo() function has to be a string anyways (which is parsed by other functions). On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Richard M.

Hi, a few days ago I upgraded to Samba 3.0.0. The upgrade worked flawlessly. I just wonder why the "force user" setting does no longer work like it should.. This is an excerpt from my smb.conf-file: [200a3i] path = /home/www_200a3i/public_html valid users = peter, niklas admin users = peter force user = www_200a3i force group = www Usually one expects that these settings make

Greetings, I am having some trouble when compiling libvoribis-1.0. It bombs out when compiling the examples dir. The output:: <p>gcc -O20 -ffast-math -mno-ieee-fp -D_REENTRANT -fsigned-char -O2 -march=i586 -DUSE_MEMORY_H -static -o decoder_example decoder_example.o ../lib/.libs/libvorbis.a -L/usr/lib -lm /usr//lib/libogg.a ../lib/.libs/libvorbis.a(mapping0.o): In function

I've downloaded the latest versions of the libraries available from the website, http://www.vorbis.com/download_unix.psp, and compiled them, but it hasn't made any difference to the situation. I downloaded the .tar.gz "for everyone" versions, not the rpm developer versions. Will this make any difference? Cheers, Oliver Sneyd <p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

Hi, While digging through the icecast2 xml configuration I noticed the option <fileserve>1</fileserve>. From what I could tell this is a totally undocumented feature and was wondering what exactly it was used for. <p> -- Colin Faber (303) 736-5160 fpsn.net, Inc. * Black holes are where God divided by zero. * --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/

Hello, I'm struggling with permissions management in samba 3.0.2, ads member mode, on SuSE 9. I have essentially two questions: 1) What is the precendence of the various permissions (Filesystem, share, ACL, smb.conf, user vs. group in each) that Samba observes, and how do they effect each other? 2) Should I be able to set share-level permissions on a samba share from a Win2k machine by working in the "Share Permissions" tab of MMC? M...

...ead R is doing the 4 $'s roughly from left to right, if you have some ideas how R works inside. (I am not saying this behavior is a "good" thing, but at least it is consistent). Basically it is a very bad habit to write code that depends on evaluation order of operators at the same precendence. The difference in behavior in the two case is probably due to coercion, (and also how lazy R does make-a-reference versus "oops, you seems to try to write to a reference so I better copy it") but I'll leave you to think about what order R is doing the combination of the 4 $'...