search for: pre20

I tried isolinux 3.10-pre20 on an Acer Aspire 1501LMi notebook and a Shuttle FS-40 desktop box; it fails on both, simply hanging after printing the first line. Last known good version is 3.10-pre16; will try pre17-pre19 when I have some time.

Hi, HPA: Thanks for the nice new features, appreciate that. Syslinux is always a nice program. For the new version, 3.10-pre20, I encountered a problem now, my client machine uses sis900 chip, and it still can not run simple menu with pxelinux in this version (3.10-pre20). It's same situation as I encountered when I used syslinux 3.07, 3.08 and 3.09. For 3.10-pre20, I compiled in Fedora Core 1, and gcc is "gcc...

...ce several prior versions were tested > > in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful > > to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches > > for (l)pxelinux. > > > > Feedback is appreciated. > > lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. > > Philipp > @Philipp, By any chance, have you tested 6.03-pre19 too? Is there any difference (regression, performance, etc.) between 6.03-pre19 and 6.03-pre20 in this particular hardware? TIA, Ady.

...ons were tested >>> in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful >>> to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches >>> for (l)pxelinux. >>> >>> Feedback is appreciated. >> >> lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. > > @Philipp, By any chance, have you tested 6.03-pre19 too? Is there any > difference (regression, performance, etc.) between 6.03-pre19 and > 6.03-pre20 in this particular hardware? I didn't notice any difference between pre19 and pre20: lpxelinux.0 w...

I think I finally have nailed down the problems with TFTP on the 4.10 branch, and so I have released 4.10-pre20. Please let me know if you have hardware on which 4.05/4.06-pre3 works, and 4.10-pre20 does not. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

Hi all, I have pushed out Syslinux 4.00-pre20, which includes support for running out of a new working directory: if a directory is given on the append line to a "config" statement, that will now be considered the new working directory. The "pathbased" branch is now the active development branch for Syslinux 4. With this...

Hi, the current 6.03~pre20 works great, can you please "finally" release this as 6.03? time is running out for Debian and I'd really like to avoid putting 6.03~pre20 labeled as such in Debian 8 (jessie). Regards, Daniel

--- On Thu, 5/31/12, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > > P.S. > > As usual, eagerly (and patiently) waiting for the HTTP > bits to start > > working properly! ;) :) > > How should I read that??.? Does it mean "I'm waiting to > get time to test" > or do you mean "tested, it doesn't work yet"??? > Anyway, please

...> in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful >>>> to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches >>>> for (l)pxelinux. >>>> >>>> Feedback is appreciated. >>> >>> lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. >> >> @Philipp, By any chance, have you tested 6.03-pre19 too? Is there any >> difference (regression, performance, etc.) between 6.03-pre19 and >> 6.03-pre20 in this particular hardware? > > I didn't notice any difference between pre19 and...

Hi,I have a PXE server with pxelinux 6.02 in my school. It can boot the laptop and desktop computer and it working very well.but I had a problem in all of the IBM THINKPAD SL410 serise laptop,the error message say "pxelinux 6.02 lwIP 2003-10-13 copyright (c) 1994-2013 H. Peter Anvin et al Boot failed:press a key to retry, or wait for reset" when it boot,after a while automaticaly

...gt; Syslinux 6.03-pre19 is out. Since several prior versions were tested > in this same hardware with different results, it could be very useful > to repeat the tests with 6.03-pre19 too, which includes some patches > for (l)pxelinux. > > Feedback is appreciated. lpxelinux from 6.03-pre20 works for my DELL E6510. Philipp

> Hello, > > On 24.07.2014 17:32, Gene Cumm wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Philipp Hahn <hahn at univention.de> wrote: > >> On 24.07.2014 13:52, Gene Cumm wrote: > >>> As expected. You have a different OUI (the first 3 octets of the MAC > >>> address). Try everything from 6.03-pre18 and then lpxelinux.0 from > >>>

Hello Syslinux Team, What actions are _supposed_ to be triggered by each of: [Ctrl-J] [Ctrl-M] in the Syslinux command line in version 6.03-pre20? Are there any differences between CLI and [vesa]menu.c32 regarding these keystroke combinations? Are there any differences in their behaviors when booting with different Syslinux variants (e.g ISOLINUX vs. SYSLINUX vs. PXELINUX)? To be clear, I am asking about what (in theory) *should* be...

Hi Gene, Thanks for the quick response. Im using pxelinux4.07. pxelinux.0 I didn?t find any lpxelinux.0 in this version I will try lpxelinux.0 from Syslinux6.03-pre20. Is there lpxelinux.0 in versions earlier than Syslinux5.10? -----Original Message----- From: Gene Cumm [mailto:gene.cumm at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 29 September, 2014 18:40 To: Wissam Shoukair; For discussion of Syslinux and tftp-hpa Subject: Re: syslimux with interrupts On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 a...

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Wissam Shoukair <wissams at mellanox.com> wrote: > Hi Gene, > > Is there a way to compile pxelinux.0 to work with interrupts ? > > I need to check my driver (based on iPXE) which works in interrupt mode (and > not polling) > > > > Thanks for your help. > > Wissam What version? pxelinux.0 or lpxelinux.0? I've never

On 9/24/2015 4:33 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Alan Sparks via Syslinux > <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Although it means another round of testing, you could also consider > lpxelinux.0 which can support HTTP URLs on its own and probably > interacts differently with iPXE. I am curious about a quantifiable > description of "an odd

...t; On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Syslinux Team, > > > > What actions are _supposed_ to be triggered by each of: > > > > [Ctrl-J] > > [Ctrl-M] > > > > in the Syslinux command line in version 6.03-pre20? > > They should do nothing special but either might be interpreted like an <enter>. > Well, for a common user, "nothing special" doesn't seem exactly the same as "<enter>". I had already seen [Ctrl+J] being the same as [Enter] in "cli.c&quo...

Anyone know how to fix this? gcc -shared -Xlinker -x -o app_rxfax.so app_rxfax.c -lspandsp -ltiff In file included from app_rxfax.c:14: /usr/include/asterisk/lock.h: In function `ast_mutex_init': /usr/include/asterisk/lock.h:302: error: `PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/include/asterisk/lock.h:302: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported

...4 at 8:18 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> What actions are _supposed_ to be triggered by each of: > >>> > >>> [Ctrl-J] > >>> [Ctrl-M] > >>> > >>> in the Syslinux command line in version 6.03-pre20? > >> > >> They should do nothing special but either might be interpreted like > >> an <enter>. > > > > Well, for a common user, "nothing special" doesn't seem exactly the > > same as "<enter>". > > > >...

On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello Syslinux Team, > > What actions are _supposed_ to be triggered by each of: > > [Ctrl-J] > [Ctrl-M] > > in the Syslinux command line in version 6.03-pre20? They should do nothing special but either might be interpreted like an <enter>. > Are there any differences between CLI and [vesa]menu.c32 regarding > these keystroke combinations? (vesa)menu.c32 have a different CLI parser so I'd expect a possibility of a difference. > Are...