search for: praher

hi everyone, I am planning on creating a local SAN via NFS(v4) and several redundant nodes. I have been using DRBD on linux before and now am asking whether some of you have experience on on-demand network filesystem mirrors. I have yet little Solaris sysadmin know how, but i am interesting whether there is an on-demand support for sending snapshots. I.e. not via a cron job, but via a

Misha Brukman wrote: > Hey, Jakob -- > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my >>system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. >> >>the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the >>libraries, like "c" or &quo...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Jakob Praher wrote: > >> thanks for the pointer. Yes I've done that, but in the new shell >> session I apparently forgot to set the LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH. >> >> now gccld isn't complaining anymore but the interpreter doesn't seem >> to like it still: > > &g...

hi, I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1] all is fine, if I just use intrinsified functions like printf and friends, but I want to use the clock_gettime function and

hi all, i would like to ask some questions regarding best practices for zfs recovery if disk errors occur. currently i have zfs boot (nv62) and the following setup: 2 si3224 controllers (each 4 sata disks) 8 sata disks, same size, same type i have two pools: a) rootpool b) datapool the rootpool is a mirrored pool, where every disk has a slice (the s0, which is 5 % of the whole disk) and this

Hey, Jakob -- On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:55:07PM +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > I'm really new to llvm. I've successfully bootstrapped llvm-14 on my > system and am able to successfully compile c code to llvm. > > the problem is now that gccld is complaining that it can't find the > libraries, like "c" or "crtend". [1]...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Jakob Praher wrote: > thanks for the pointer. Yes I've done that, but in the new shell session I > apparently forgot to set the LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH. > > now gccld isn't complaining anymore but the interpreter doesn't seem to like > it still: It looks like the jit doesn't find...

On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Jakob Praher wrote: >> If you pass '-lrt' when linking your program, it should take care of this >> for you. >> > > ah ok. so every library thet gccld can't find as a bytecode lib is added to > the shell script then. Yup. Note there are other options if you don't...

hi all, sorry I had problems with my last mail (I hope this goes through). Do the llvm binutils currently support macho/x86 (for use with mactels?) thanks in advance -- Jakob ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de

...d on. It's very new which means you must check out the source from CVS and build your own binary. If you can live with the lack of vector support and the occasional bugs :-), I would urge you to do so and share us with your experience. Cheers, Evan On Feb 10, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Jakob Praher wrote: > hi all, > > sorry I had problems with my last mail (I hope this > goes through). > > Do the llvm binutils currently support macho/x86 (for > use with mactels?) > > thanks in advance > -- Jakob > > > > > > > _______________________...

...detected and the functions in question get recompiled and relinked, such that the change is now applied within the application. Every change can be undone. This is done by keeping an undo record of changes (allthough other approaches would seem fit also). The thesis can be found on http://www.prahersoft.com/~jp/da.pdf. Part of the thesis is an extensive documentation of the LLVM framework from a 10000 feet view. This might be interesting to new-comers. The reason why I did not post information on this list, is that the my university rules did not allow me to. I would be interested in heari...

You need to use -emit-llvm http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#tutorial4 -Tanya On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Jakob Praher wrote: > hi all, > > i surely overlooked something. > but i am currently trying to do some benchmarking stuff with llvm. > in my thesis i was using llvm-1.5 (i did some extension work, which i > would have to frontport now). > > But unfortunately 1.5 is for some benchmarks...

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>> If you pass '-lrt' when linking your program, it should take care of >>> this for you. >>> >> >> ah ok. so every library thet gccld can't find as a bytecode lib is >> added to the shell script then. > > > Yup. N...

On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Jakob Praher wrote: > I have used LLVM extensively over the last 2 years. > I have realized a so called change framework that based on the LLVM > framework. I am just now getting a chance to read through your thesis. It looks like excellent work. Do you mind if we add it to llvm.org/pubs ? -Chris...

hi all, i surely overlooked something. but i am currently trying to do some benchmarking stuff with llvm. in my thesis i was using llvm-1.5 (i did some extension work, which i would have to frontport now). But unfortunately 1.5 is for some benchmarks unstable (at least on my box) such that llc sigsegvs sometimes, etc. So I wanted to give 1.9 a go and build that on the my intel mac book. I did

>>>>> "Jakob" == Jakob Praher <jp at hapra.at> writes: Jakob> I would definitely like to look into it. I'll send it in private email. Jakob> Yes very much! How did you find writing it directly in Jakob> SSA-form. Actually I used what Chris called "the alloca trick"... the JIT doesn't really...

Hi Reid, Reid Spencer schrieb: > I have some thoughts on this too .. > Great! > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many information >>is done by some runtime std::map<Value*,foo> stuff. Which is really >>handy at runtime, but I *had* serialization in mind when I was thinking >>about Annotations. I see annotation...

...untime data with compiled functions converted to native. In the short term I think I'll simply use the class file format in my native compiled classes and wait and see how this turns out. I've been stuck thinking about this for two months. Thanks for the ideas. Mike On 2/25/06, Jakob Praher <jp at hapra.at> wrote: > Hi Reid, > > Reid Spencer schrieb: > > I have some thoughts on this too .. > > > Great! > > > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > > > >>I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many i...

...d see how this turns out. I've been stuck thinking about > this for two months. So you are currently compiling class files to LLVM modules and you place the Java .class file inforamtion in the LLVM bytecode too? Or am I missing somethign here? > --Jakob > > > On 2/25/06, Jakob Praher <jp at hapra.at> wrote: > >>Hi Reid, >> >>Reid Spencer schrieb: >> >>>I have some thoughts on this too .. >>> >> >>Great! >> >> >>>On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: >>> >>> &g...

...ry easy pipelining of passes.) I'm wondering if the change language can be used to describe a sequence of transformations more abstractly to make this kind of research easier and more systematic? --Vikram http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve http://llvm.org On Apr 25, 2007, at 2:01 AM, Jakob Praher wrote: > hi all, > > I have used LLVM extensively over the last 2 years. > I have realized a so called change framework that based on the LLVM > framework. > > Basically it is a framework that augments the JIT to understand > "changes", such that a mutator process...