Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr33523".
Did you mean:
pr33522
2017 Jun 28
3
Next steps for optimization remarks?
...se I will. I filed llvm.org/PR33522 for this.
>
> In terms of improving the performance, I am pretty sure the bottleneck is still YAML parsing so:
>
> - If PGO is used, we can have a threshold to not even emit remarks on cold code, this should dramatically improve performance, llvm.org/PR33523
> - I expect that some sort of binary encoding of YAML would speed up parsing but I haven’t researched this topic yet...
I added progress indicators in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34735, and it
seems like it takes a while for the Python scripts to read some of the
larger YAML files produced for m...
2017 Jun 27
2
Next steps for optimization remarks?
Adam, thanks for all the suggestions!
One nice aspect of the `-Rpass` family of options is that I can filter
based on what I want. If I only want to see which inlines I missed, I could
use `clang -Rpass-missed="inline"`, for example. On the other hand,
optimization remark YAML always include remarks from all passes (as far as
I can tell), which increases the amount of time it takes
2017 Jun 19
8
Next steps for optimization remarks?
Hello all,
In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed)
describes optimization remarks and some future plans for the project. I had
a few follow-up questions:
1. As an example of future work to be done, the talk mentions expanding the
set of optimization passes that emit remarks. However, the Clang User
Manual mentions that "optimization remarks do not really make