Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr33522".
2017 Jun 27
2
Next steps for optimization remarks?
...cluding options to, for
example, only emit optimization remarks related to loop vectorization, or
to not emit any analysis remarks? Or is it important that the YAML always
include all remarks?
Let me know what you think! In the meantime, I'll try to add the progress
bar you mention in llvm.org/PR33522. Thanks!
- Brian Gesiak
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170627/2000005c/attachment.html>
2017 Jun 28
3
Next steps for optimization remarks?
...rt, and will be even more true in the future.
Ah, I see, that makes sense. Thanks!
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote:
>
> We desperately need a progress bar in opt-viewer. Let me know if you want to add it otherwise I will. I filed llvm.org/PR33522 for this.
>
> In terms of improving the performance, I am pretty sure the bottleneck is still YAML parsing so:
>
> - If PGO is used, we can have a threshold to not even emit remarks on cold code, this should dramatically improve performance, llvm.org/PR33523
> - I expect that some so...
2017 Jun 19
8
Next steps for optimization remarks?
Hello all,
In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed)
describes optimization remarks and some future plans for the project. I had
a few follow-up questions:
1. As an example of future work to be done, the talk mentions expanding the
set of optimization passes that emit remarks. However, the Clang User
Manual mentions that "optimization remarks do not really make