Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr13693".
Did you mean:
pr13676
2012 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] Let's get rid of neverHasSideEffects
...The former was to be used when an insn had no pattern and the latter, when mayStore was implied in the pattern.
>
> If only TableGen wouldn't warn about non-conflicting attributes at least…
That warning has been removed now, and you should be able to clean up your classes.
I also filed PR13693 for you. It's a bug to lower atomic_load to an instruction without mayStore - atomic loads can't be reordered.
/jakob
2012 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] Let's get rid of neverHasSideEffects
On 08/21/12 16:49, Jim Grosbach wrote:
>
> I like that. Possibly with the addition that we can filter by a specific property. -Winfer=neverHasSideEffects, e.g., would only show when that specific property is inferred.
>
> Beyond that, I don't see an alternative to an audit of the instructions that get flagged by such a warning. :(
This proposal would certainly make my life easier