Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "pr13676".
Did you mean:
13676
2012 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
[+cfe-dev as this does seem like both LLVM+Clang issue]
[Sorry for an incomplete e-mail context, please see
http://llvm.org/PR13676#c6 if you're interested]
I've read these bugs and now I'm even more confused than I was before :)
What do you think about the following approach:
a) I'll create test cases for the major issues I've observed so far
These test cases will check both -emit-llvm and llc output...
2012 Oct 02
5
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote:
> Hello Timur,
>
>> I'd like to ask for advice:
>> a) Is it OK to change the SRet/ThisCall behaviour on non-Windows platforms?
>> [I suppose no]
> no
>
>>
>> b) Should I be altering CC_X86_32_ThisCall
>> OR should I introduce CC_X86_Win32_ThisCall
2012 Oct 02
2
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
> [+cfe-dev as this does seem like both LLVM+Clang issue]
> [Sorry for an incomplete e-mail context, please see
> http://llvm.org/PR13676#c6 if you're interested]
>
> I've read these bugs and now I'm even more confused than I was before :)
>
> What do you think about the following approach:
> a) I'll create test cases for the major issues I've observed so far
> These test cases will check both...
2012 Oct 02
0
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
...PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
>> [+cfe-dev as this does seem like both LLVM+Clang issue]
>> [Sorry for an incomplete e-mail context, please see
>> http://llvm.org/PR13676#c6 if you're interested]
>>
>> I've read these bugs and now I'm even more confused than I was before :)
>>
>> What do you think about the following approach:
>> a) I'll create test cases for the major issues I've observed so far
>> These te...
2012 Oct 02
3
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
...e <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
>>> [+cfe-dev as this does seem like both LLVM+Clang issue]
>>> [Sorry for an incomplete e-mail context, please see
>>> http://llvm.org/PR13676#c6 if you're interested]
>>>
>>> I've read these bugs and now I'm even more confused than I was before :)
>>>
>>> What do you think about the following approach:
>>> a) I'll create test cases for the major issues I've observed so far...
2012 Oct 02
4
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
Hello Aaron, Anton, LLVM-dev,
While working on http://llvm.org/PR13676#c6
I found out that whenever I compile code with class methods returning
structures it get generated incompatible with MSVC.
Looking at lib/Target/X86/X86CallingConv.td, I found out that
CC_X86_32_ThisCall maps SRet to EAX but in fact it should push
the address of the return temp on stack.
The fo...
2012 Oct 04
0
[LLVMdev] Handling SRet on Windows x86
...t gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com> wrote:
>>>> [+cfe-dev as this does seem like both LLVM+Clang issue]
>>>> [Sorry for an incomplete e-mail context, please see
>>>> http://llvm.org/PR13676#c6 if you're interested]
>>>>
>>>> I've read these bugs and now I'm even more confused than I was before :)
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about the following approach:
>>>> a) I'll create test cases for the major issues I'...