search for: ppdesc

...0x000070000000000e, pal = 0x0000000051012748, the_acl_type = 410016384), line 2462 in "posix_acls.c" posix_get_nt_acl_common(conn = 0x000000011014b960, name = "", sbuf = 0x00000000510126f5, pal = (nil), posix_acl = 0x0fffffffffffd690, def_acl = (nil), security_info = 268435455, ppdesc = 0x0fffffffffffd338), line 3177 in "posix_acls.c" posix_get_nt_acl(conn = 0x09000000000103e0, name = (nil), security_info = 268435455, ppdesc = (nil)), line 3467 in "posix_acls.c" vfswrap_get_nt_acl(handle = 0x0fffffffffffd160, name = "", security_info = 1, ppdesc = 0...

...("get_nt_acl_internal: returning acl for %s is:\n", > smb_fname->base_name )); > - NDR_PRINT_DEBUG(security_descriptor, psd); > + NDR_PRINT_DEBUG(security_descriptor, psd_blob); > } > > /* The VFS API is that the ACL is expected to be on mem_ctx */ > - *ppdesc = talloc_move(mem_ctx, &psd); > + *ppdesc = talloc_move(mem_ctx, &psd_blob); > > TALLOC_FREE(frame); > return NT_STATUS_OK; > -- > 2.7.4 > > > From bf5cd7cb4aac0733c8634b62ad29c128a9b3f451 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba...

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:33:26PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, as much as I'd like to avoid adding a new option, I guess we > > > have to do something about it, my latest take on this is >

...("get_nt_acl_internal: returning acl for %s is:\n", > smb_fname->base_name )); > - NDR_PRINT_DEBUG(security_descriptor, psd); > + NDR_PRINT_DEBUG(security_descriptor, psd_blob); > } > > /* The VFS API is that the ACL is expected to be on mem_ctx */ > - *ppdesc = talloc_move(mem_ctx, &psd); > + *ppdesc = talloc_move(mem_ctx, &psd_blob); > > TALLOC_FREE(frame); > return NT_STATUS_OK; > -- > 2.7.4 > > > From b37829fdcc5dac4e289b3b6ccc5a05fad4e529a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ralph Boehme <slow at samba...

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:03:49PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 02:46:19PM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > > > > > Cheerio! > > > -slow > > > > Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: > > > > When adding the

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the