search for: porbably

Hello, I am looking at the Xapian database spelling support, with the idea of getting rid of the cumbersome use of aspell in my application. One advantage of aspell, though, (in my eye), is that it can supply a list of alternate spellings, not just the one it considers best. In some cases, this can be useful. 2 examples on my test index: porbability: xapian suggests portability, which is nice,

Hello Friends, I am trying to Installl dahdi on amazon EC2 which have Open-SUSE-11.1 X86 version. and here is snap of uname- a command *Linux ip-10-160-86-41 2.6.32.19-0.3-ec2 #1 SMP 2010-09-17 20:28:21 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux* when I try to run DAHDI distribution dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 I am getting following error *echo "You do not appear to have the sources for the

...gt;> >> Results: >> - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium >> size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -39%) and almost all rx (at most >> -79%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible >> wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see >> some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. >> - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge >> write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were >> increased). >> - Very minor rx r...

...gt;> >> Results: >> - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium >> size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -39%) and almost all rx (at most >> -79%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible >> wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see >> some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. >> - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge >> write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were >> increased). >> - Very minor rx r...

...ack connected ixgbe - Guest with 1 vcpu and 1 queue Results: - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -39%) and almost all rx (at most -79%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_...

...ack connected ixgbe - Guest with 1 vcpu and 1 queue Results: - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -39%) and almost all rx (at most -79%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_...

I have installed lme4 library, but when I try something with lmer() function, I receive error message. On the other hand, I can use lme() function from the same library. Are those two the very same function or not? I am a bit confused. I am using: $platform: "i386-pc-linux-gnu" $arch: "i386" $os: "linux-gnu" $system: "i386, linux-gnu" $major: "2"

...ith 1 vcpu and 1 queue > > Results: > - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium > size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -39%) and almost all rx (at most > -79%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible > wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see > some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. > - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge > write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were > increased). > - Very minor rx regression in some ca...

Full_Name: Anne CORI Version: 2.6.1 OS: windows Submission from: (NULL) (134.157.220.19) let A be a mtrix with n lines and p columns, p>36 ; matplot(A) will only draw the plot of the first 36 columns of A. This is due to a bug in the definition of pch in the function : pch <- c(paste(c(1:9, 0)), letters)[1:k] should be replaced by pch <- c(paste(c(1:9, 0)), letters) I hope this

...and similar are left out of share definition, and you rely on the default standard 644 file modes and 755 directory modes. 3. Problem does *not* occur if you use the "force user" options, even if you also use "force group" and "force create mode" -- though these are porbably unnedded in that scenario. I opted for solution (3), because all valid users of the share in question need write access to all files. Though it results in a lack fine-grained access control. --- "Terry L. Eleiott" <teleiott@tke-companies.com> wrote: > Has this issue, Excel...

Dear all, I got this error message > library(dprep) > mardia(Savg) Error in cov(data) : 'x' is empty But with the same data, I got > library(mvnormtest) > mshapiro.test(Savg) Shapiro-Wilk normality test data: Z W = 0.9411, p-value = 0.6739 What does the error message "Error in cov(data) : 'x' is empty" mean? Thanks a lot! Jiao

...and similar are left out of share definition, and you rely on the default standard 644 file modes and 755 directory modes. 3. Problem does *not* occur if you use the "force user" options, even if you also use "force group" and "force create mode" -- though these are porbably unnedded in that scenario. I opted for solution (3), because all valid users of the share in question need write access to all files. Though it results in a lack fine-grained access control. --- "Terry L. Eleiott" <teleiott@tke-companies.com> wrote: > Has this issue, Excel...

...Results: >>> - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium >>> size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -39%) and almost all rx (at most >>> -79%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible >>> wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see >>> some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. >>> - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 105%) expect for the huge >>> write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were >>> increased). >>&g...

I have written an R package which contains C source code (in the directory pkg/src). Only a subset of the functions in the pkg/R directory contain a .C() call to the functions in the pkg/src directory. The rest of the package will still work and be useful without the functions containing a .C() call. To compile the code in pkg/src requires the GSL library. This is detailed in the

...k to back connected ixgbe - Guest with 1 vcpu and 1 queue Results: - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -43%) and almost all rx (at most -84%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 50%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at...

...k to back connected ixgbe - Guest with 1 vcpu and 1 queue Results: - For stream workload, ioexits were reduced dramatically in medium size (1024-2048) of tx (at most -43%) and almost all rx (at most -84%) as a result of polling. This compensate for the possible wasted cpu cycles more or less. That porbably why we can still see some increasing in the normalized throughput in some cases. - Throughput of tx were increased (at most 50%) expect for the huge write (16384). And we can send more packets in the case (+tpkts were increased). - Very minor rx regression in some cases. - Improvemnt on TCP_RR (at...

I recently bought 2 different USB flash disks. These are some cheap no-name devices. Their parameters: bytes C/H/S ID 4194304512 509/255/63 Vendor: Generic Model: USB Flash Drive Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 4288676352 1023/132/62 Vendor: USB Model: USB 2.0 Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 When I put a FAT32 filesystem on them,