search for: porbability

...spelling support, with the idea of getting rid of the cumbersome use of aspell in my application. One advantage of aspell, though, (in my eye), is that it can supply a list of alternate spellings, not just the one it considers best. In some cases, this can be useful. 2 examples on my test index: porbability: xapian suggests portability, which is nice, but I was intending probability which is in the aspell list all right. macdonell: xapian suggests macdonald, all right again, but aspell also suggests mcdowell and mcdonald, which might be actually useful to someone trying to remember the name of a corr...

Hello Friends, I am trying to Installl dahdi on amazon EC2 which have Open-SUSE-11.1 X86 version. and here is snap of uname- a command *Linux ip-10-160-86-41 2.6.32.19-0.3-ec2 #1 SMP 2010-09-17 20:28:21 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux* when I try to run DAHDI distribution dahdi-linux-2.1.0.4 I am getting following error *echo "You do not appear to have the sources for the

Hi Jason, I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? Also, did you measure how polling affects many VMs talking to each other (e.g. 20 VMs on each host, perhaps with several vNICs each, transmitting to a corresponding VM/vNIC pair on another host)? On a complete separate experiment (busy waiting on storage I/O rings on Xen), I have observed

Hi Jason, I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? Also, did you measure how polling affects many VMs talking to each other (e.g. 20 VMs on each host, perhaps with several vNICs each, transmitting to a corresponding VM/vNIC pair on another host)? On a complete separate experiment (busy waiting on storage I/O rings on Xen), I have observed

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected ixgbe

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected ixgbe

I have installed lme4 library, but when I try something with lmer() function, I receive error message. On the other hand, I can use lme() function from the same library. Are those two the very same function or not? I am a bit confused. I am using: $platform: "i386-pc-linux-gnu" $arch: "i386" $os: "linux-gnu" $system: "i386, linux-gnu" $major: "2"

On 11/12/2015 06:16 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi all: > > This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is > simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added > descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of > time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. > > Test were done through: > > -

Full_Name: Anne CORI Version: 2.6.1 OS: windows Submission from: (NULL) (134.157.220.19) let A be a mtrix with n lines and p columns, p>36 ; matplot(A) will only draw the plot of the first 36 columns of A. This is due to a bug in the definition of pch in the function : pch <- c(paste(c(1:9, 0)), letters)[1:k] should be replaced by pch <- c(paste(c(1:9, 0)), letters) I hope this

I have found the following regarding this problem: 1. It occurs only on files that (a) the user does not own AND (b) samba is forcing write permissions on (e.g. with the "force group" or "force create mode"). 2. Problem does *not* occur when "force create mode" and similar are left out of share definition, and you rely on the default standard 644 file modes and 755

Dear all, I got this error message > library(dprep) > mardia(Savg) Error in cov(data) : 'x' is empty But with the same data, I got > library(mvnormtest) > mshapiro.test(Savg) Shapiro-Wilk normality test data: Z W = 0.9411, p-value = 0.6739 What does the error message "Error in cov(data) : 'x' is empty" mean? Thanks a lot! Jiao

I have had the same problem: Shared files, not owned by the user in question, were being deleted and re-written upon saving the file. Because Excel only gives user (not group) permission, it will muck up access for other users in the group. In my case, I was not enforcing anything (when the problem occurred) and my .conf only had the bare minimum of information, I also used method 3, but put a

On 11/12/2015 08:02 PM, Felipe Franciosi wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I understand your busy loop timeout is quite conservative at 50us. Did you try any other values? I've also tried 20us. And results shows 50us was better in: - very small packet tx (e.g 64bytes at most 46% improvement) - TCP_RR (at most 11% improvement) But I will test bigger values. In fact, for net itself, we can be

I have written an R package which contains C source code (in the directory pkg/src). Only a subset of the functions in the pkg/R directory contain a .C() call to the functions in the pkg/src directory. The rest of the package will still work and be useful without the functions containing a .C() call. To compile the code in pkg/src requires the GSL library. This is detailed in the

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test A were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected

Hi all: This series tries to add basic busy polling for vhost net. The idea is simple: at the end of tx/rx processing, busy polling for new tx added descriptor and rx receive socket for a while. The maximum number of time (in us) could be spent on busy polling was specified ioctl. Test A were done through: - 50 us as busy loop timeout - Netperf 2.6 - Two machines with back to back connected

I recently bought 2 different USB flash disks. These are some cheap no-name devices. Their parameters: bytes C/H/S ID 4194304512 509/255/63 Vendor: Generic Model: USB Flash Drive Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 4288676352 1023/132/62 Vendor: USB Model: USB 2.0 Rev: 1.00 ANSI SCSI revision: 02 When I put a FAT32 filesystem on them,