search for: polyserver

Sunil Mushran wrote: >And as that gets into reading debugocfs outputs, the user has to make the determination, if the effort is worth the gain in performance. Why only logfiles? Well, because Oracle performs large ios only to the logfiles. The ios to be datafiles are in smaller chunks. Hope this helps. Sunil I'd like to point out a small mistake in this post. Oracle most certainly

...t; definition in our samba file. > Our Solaris Unix is connected to a NT server as well as a Digital Alpha. > Since we upgraded the version of the Oracle on the Alpha, the Alpha sends > messages to the NT that the Alpha is the "master browser". > [global] > password server=POLYSERVER > security=server > workgroup=POLYGAL > print command=lpr -P%p -h %s > printing=bsd > printcap name=/etc/printcap > guest account=pri70 > > Above is a copy of our global definitions. > Do I need to add "wins server = IP address" ? > Something else????????...

Sort of a followup... We've been running OCFS in sync mode for a little over a month now, and it has worked reasonably well. Performance is still a bit spotty, but we're told that the next kernel update for RHEL3 should improve the situation. We might eventually move to Polyserve's cluster filesystem for its multipathing capability and potentially better performance, but at least we

I'm vainly trying to get a new server ready to become the default mail server. We have a SAN, so I don't need to move the mailboxes (I can mount the same partition from both machines), but the question is what version of dovecot to load. I'm assuming that I cannot run both 0.99.14 and 1.00.x on the same maildirs (the indexes differ?). However, is it safe for me to mount the

Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Feb 20, 2009 20:23 +0300, Kirill Kuvaldin wrote: >> I'm evaluating different cluster file systems that can work with large >> clustered environment, e.g. hundreds of nodes connected to a SAN over >> FC. >> >> So far I looked at OCFS2 and GFS2, they both worked nearly the same >> in terms of performance, but since I ran my

Running current CVS HEAD I get: dovecot: Dec 01 13:27:38 Info: Dovecot v1.0-test52 starting up dovecot: Dec 01 13:33:34 Info: imap-login: Login: jtl [69.162.177.245] dovecot: Dec 01 13:41:07 Error: IMAP(jtl): UIDVALIDITY changed (1100294646 -> 110192643 5) in mbox file /var/spool/mail/j/t/jtl dovecot: Dec 01 13:41:07 Error: IMAP(jtl): UIDVALIDITY changed (1100294646 -> 110192643 5) in

Dear ext3-users, I write scientific number-crunching codes which deal with large input and output files (Gb, tens of Gb, as much as hundreds of Gygabytes on occasions). Now there are these multi-core setups like Intel Core 2 Duo becoming available at a low cost. Disk I/O is one of the biggest bottlenecks. I would very much like to put to use the multiple processors to read or write in parallel

Hi, i just want to know whether there are any alternative file systems for HP SFS. I heard that there is Cluster Gateway from Polyserve. Can anybody plz help me in finding more abt this Cluster Gateway. Thanks and Regards, Ashok Bharat -----Original Message----- From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org Sent: Tue 2/12/2008 3:18 AM

I have been successfully using the technique of creating "virtual servers" via the method outlined below in my smb.conf file. [global] netbios name = %h workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios aliases = cifs1 cifs2 include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%L Now under Red Hat ES release 4 with kernel "2.6.9-11.EL" and Samba version