search for: polyserve

...Parallel Query and normal foreground processes alike perform multiblock IO. They are known as direct path read and write, scattered read and others and are driven by full scans, index range scans, foreground temp segment IO, recovery and so on. Kevin Closson Chief Architect, Database Solutions PolyServe, Inc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs-users/attachments/20040526/37c8278d/attachment.htm

...t; definition in our samba file. > Our Solaris Unix is connected to a NT server as well as a Digital Alpha. > Since we upgraded the version of the Oracle on the Alpha, the Alpha sends > messages to the NT that the Alpha is the "master browser". > [global] > password server=POLYSERVER > security=server > workgroup=POLYGAL > print command=lpr -P%p -h %s > printing=bsd > printcap name=/etc/printcap > guest account=pri70 > > Above is a copy of our global definitions. > Do I need to add "wins server = IP address" ? > Something else???????...

Sort of a followup... We've been running OCFS in sync mode for a little over a month now, and it has worked reasonably well. Performance is still a bit spotty, but we're told that the next kernel update for RHEL3 should improve the situation. We might eventually move to Polyserve's cluster filesystem for its multipathing capability and potentially better performance, but at least we have a stable, functioning platform for the time being. My DBA still wants to try async mode with OCFS. We followed your recommendations for using dd to recreate the logfiles to be contigu...

I'm vainly trying to get a new server ready to become the default mail server. We have a SAN, so I don't need to move the mailboxes (I can mount the same partition from both machines), but the question is what version of dovecot to load. I'm assuming that I cannot run both 0.99.14 and 1.00.x on the same maildirs (the indexes differ?). However, is it safe for me to mount the

...;t be >> extrapolated to 100 nodes. >> >> Is there any reading on comparison of OCFS2/GFS2 scalability? And >> could these FS scale up to environment of that size (100-1000 nodes, >> 10-100Tb storage) or should I look to proprietary solutions like IBM >> GPFS, HP Polyserve, etc... ? > I'm fairly biased, but I think you should look at Lustre - it is currently > running on 15 of the 20 fastest systems in the world, and 40% of the top 200. > No problems with scalability at all - the ORNL Jaguar system has 37000+ > nodes, 10PB of storage, and has exceeded...

Running current CVS HEAD I get: dovecot: Dec 01 13:27:38 Info: Dovecot v1.0-test52 starting up dovecot: Dec 01 13:33:34 Info: imap-login: Login: jtl [69.162.177.245] dovecot: Dec 01 13:41:07 Error: IMAP(jtl): UIDVALIDITY changed (1100294646 -> 110192643 5) in mbox file /var/spool/mail/j/t/jtl dovecot: Dec 01 13:41:07 Error: IMAP(jtl): UIDVALIDITY changed (1100294646 -> 110192643 5) in

Dear ext3-users, I write scientific number-crunching codes which deal with large input and output files (Gb, tens of Gb, as much as hundreds of Gygabytes on occasions). Now there are these multi-core setups like Intel Core 2 Duo becoming available at a low cost. Disk I/O is one of the biggest bottlenecks. I would very much like to put to use the multiple processors to read or write in parallel

Hi, i just want to know whether there are any alternative file systems for HP SFS. I heard that there is Cluster Gateway from Polyserve. Can anybody plz help me in finding more abt this Cluster Gateway. Thanks and Regards, Ashok Bharat -----Original Message----- From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org Sent: Tue 2/12/2008 3:18 AM To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.or...

I have been successfully using the technique of creating "virtual servers" via the method outlined below in my smb.conf file. [global] netbios name = %h workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios aliases = cifs1 cifs2 include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%L Now under Red Hat ES release 4 with kernel "2.6.9-11.EL" and Samba version