search for: pmb

...ter size for > // instance) > PM.add(createTargetTransformInfoWrapperPass(TM->getTargetIRAnalysis())); > > Also, are you populating the pass manager using the passmanagerbuilder? You still need the TLI: > > // Populate the PassManager > PassManagerBuilder PMB; > PMB.LibraryInfo = new TargetLibraryInfoImpl(TM->getTargetTriple()); > .... > > > Or without the PassManagerBuild, something like: > > PM.add(new TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass(TargetLibraryInfoImpl(TM->getTargetTriple()))); > >

...Other users of LLVM (such as OpenCL JITs) do scalarize early in the optimization pipeline because the problem-domain presents lots of vectors that needs to be legalized. I am very supportive of adding the new scalarization pass, but I don’t want you to add it to the PassManagerBuilder because the PMB is designed for static C compilers, that don’t have this problem. Are you interested in improving code generation for c++ programs or for programs from another domain ? Thanks, Nadav -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/piperma...

Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? > The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing > scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function. As an alternative, adding Scalarizer and InstCombine passes to SystemZPassConfig::addIRPasses() would probably give m...

I'm using the terminal commands from http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=19141 The LeagueofLegends.exe starts fine, but when it gets to the part where it starts Pando Media Booster, I get a Program Error saying "The program PMB.exe has encountered a serious problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience." Under that it says: "This can be caused by a problem in the program of a deficiency in Wine". I checked the Application Database to resolve this but didn't find a way to fix it. I...

...(such as OpenCL JITs) do scalarize early in the > optimization pipeline because the problem-domain presents lots of > vectors that needs to be legalized. I am very supportive of adding > the new scalarization pass, but I don’t want you to add it to the > PassManagerBuilder because the PMB is designed for static C compilers, > that don’t have this problem. But why do you think static C compilers don't have this problem? The vector extensions to C were added for a reason :-) And you can go quite a long way with generic vector operations. > Are you interested in improving...

Hi, Our public library management software (PMB) runs on Apache/PHP/MySQL. It requires some additional PHP modules to run correctly, namely: 1) php-gd 2) php-yaz 3) php-xslt I've googled and fiddled around quite a bit, and come to the following conclusions: 1) php-gd can be installed from extra repos (rpmforge IIRC), so this one's...

Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: > On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford > <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >>> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >>> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing >>> scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function. >> >> As an alternative, adding Scalarizer and InstCombine passes to >> SystemZPass...

On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing >> scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function. > > As an alternative, adding Scalarizer and InstCombine passes to > SystemZPassConfig::addIRPasses(...

...de/llvm/PassAnalysisSupport.h, line 221. Is there any suggestion on this? And how do I make sure my transform passes in PassManagerBuilder are executed in a given order? Previously I create a dummy pass that calls the actual transform passes and run them in order, then inject this dummy pass into PMB -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191220/9247bb16/attachment.html>

I'm using llvm-c (but if needed can call c++ stuff too if nedeed); what's the proper way to emit bitcode with thinlto info so the linker can parallelize ?I'm currently using: unwrap(PMB)->PrepareForThinLTO = b; on the pass manager builder, but that doesn't seem to be enough? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180330/6a95f377/attachment.html>

Hi, I'm running a few PHP-based apps on our server (PMB, SPIP, Joomla, PHPMyAdmin), and I'm not always comforted about security. I don't know the details, but many a security expert frowns when it comes to PHP. Now I just stumbled over this: http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin.127.html Has anyone already tried this out? An opinion about it?...

...rote: > Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: >> On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford >> <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>> Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >>>> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >>>> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing >>>> scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function. >>> >>> As an alternative, adding Scalarizer and InstCombine passes to >...

...ptimizations. Admittedly I'm not making much concessesion for that, because I think of loop nest optimization as a different tool that will probably want fairly substantial changes to the pass pipeline anyway. Here's a few of ways it might work: (1) Loop nest optimizer extends the standard PMB by plugging in its own passes prior to Generic Loop Opts in addition to loading TTI. The loop nest optimizer's passes are free to query TTI: (2) Loop nest optimizer suppresses generic loop opts through a PMB flag (assuming they are too disruptive). It registers its own loop passes with the Tar...

I have some trouble making the SIMD vector length visible to the passes. My application is basically on the level of 'opt'. What I did in version 3.6 was functionPassManager->add(new llvm::TargetLibraryInfo(llvm::Triple(Mod->getTargetTriple()))); functionPassManager->add(new llvm::DataLayoutPass()); and then the -basicaa and -loop-vectorizer were able to vectorize the input

...y be worth extracting out of a more complex loop. In addition to that, for this example to make sense, the vectorization passes would have to run afterwards, which would then put a bound on how late this transformation could be done. I guess the approach of being able to extend/modify what the PMB creates, that you mention below, would address this problem. > I think you're only worried about the impact on loop nest optimizations. Admittedly I'm not making much concessesion for that, because I think of loop nest optimization as a different tool that will probably want fairly su...

...to completely to remove what is left of the pass from the source tree. However, there are a few C API functions for creating and managing the pass: /** See llvm::PassManagerBuilder::DisableSimplifyLibCalls */ void LLVMPassManagerBuilderSetDisableSimplifyLibCalls(LLVMPassManagerBuilderRef PMB, LLVMBool Value); /** See llvm::createSimplifyLibCallsPass function. */ void LLVMAddSimplifyLibCallsPass(LLVMPassManagerRef PM); Is it OK to remove these? Do I need to keep them? Or is there some sort of deprecation process? -- Meador

...ly be seen if they were all there). So my question is, can I override what R is doing to the tick labels, without making the labels smaller? I searched the help files but couldn't find anything specifically on this. cheers, Matt. Dr Matt Fischer ANSTO - Institute for Nuclear Geophysiology PMB 1 Menai NSW 2234 Ph: +61 2 9717 9686 Fax: +61 2 9717 3599 Mobile: 0428 363 146 http://www.ansto.gov.au/nugeo/ http://ipilps.ansto.gov.au/ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...1962435 0.5032916 31.28465 Number of Observations: 46831 Number of Groups: 4994 I would like to extract the table of correlations, but have not been able to do it. Any assistance, much appreciated. Cheers, Evelyn Evelyn Hall PhD Student Faculty of Veterinary Science The University of Sydney PMB 3 Camden, NSW, 2570 Phone: +61 2 9036 7736 Email: evelynw@camden.usyd.edu.au [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

..., 2018, 00:50 Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I'm using llvm-c (but if needed can call c++ stuff too if nedeed); what's > the proper way to emit bitcode with thinlto info so the linker can > parallelize ? > I'm currently using: > unwrap(PMB)->PrepareForThinLTO = b; > > on the pass manager builder, but that doesn't seem to be enough? > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > -------...

...<llvm- > dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:>> __ >> I'm using llvm-c (but if needed can call c++ stuff too if nedeed); >> what's the proper way to emit bitcode with thinlto info so the linker >> can parallelize ?>> I'm currently using: >> unwrap(PMB)->PrepareForThinLTO = b; >> >> on the pass manager builder, but that doesn't seem to be enough? >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list...