search for: mb

...62M 4.0K 62M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda6 4.2G 3.6G 453M 89% /tmp /dev/sda5 938M 205M 685M 23% /var cctest1$ dmesg | grep DMA DMA zone: 101376 pages, LIFO batch:16 cctest1$ for i in `seq 1 10`; do hdparm -tT /dev/sda1; done Timing cached reads: 512 MB in 2.00 seconds = 256.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 44 MB in 3.00 seconds = 14.67 MB/sec Timing cached reads: 528 MB in 2.01 seconds = 262.69 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 84 MB in 3.08 seconds = 27.27 MB/sec Timing cached reads: 520 MB in 2.00 seconds = 260.00...

...62M 4.0K 62M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda6 4.2G 3.6G 453M 89% /tmp /dev/sda5 938M 205M 685M 23% /var cctest1$ dmesg | grep DMA DMA zone: 101376 pages, LIFO batch:16 cctest1$ for i in `seq 1 10`; do hdparm -tT /dev/sda1; done Timing cached reads: 512 MB in 2.00 seconds = 256.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 44 MB in 3.00 seconds = 14.67 MB/sec Timing cached reads: 528 MB in 2.01 seconds = 262.69 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 84 MB in 3.08 seconds = 27.27 MB/sec Timing cached reads: 520 MB in 2.00 seconds = 260.00...

...most of them deal with compressing large files. Tinc on the other hand has to compress small packets individually. So I did the benchmark with two different packet sizes; 1451 (which is the usual payload size of VPN packets that tinc sents on MTU 1500 paths) and 8951 (the equivalent if you enable jumbograms and your network supports it, not likely over the Internet). Both the speed (higher is better) and the compression ratio (lower is better) are benchmarked. The speed is measured for both compressing and decompressing the data. If you are CPU bound and have a high bandwidth network, then this...

Hi, We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance of btrfs is very poor. The test is that we create 50000 files and measure the file-create time first, and then delete these 50000 files and measure the file-delete time. (The attached file is the reproduce program) The result is following: (Unit: second) Create file performance BtrFS Ext4 Total times:

Hi, I'm not sure this is supposed to happen (my computer rebooted halfway through adding an other drive to a volume): [long lines needed] (02:44:50 <~>) 0 $ sudo vinum ld D storage State: up Device /dev/ad0d Avail: 38166/381 66 MB (100%) D worthless State: up Device /dev/ad2d Avail: 38038/380 38 MB (100%) D barracuda State: up Device /dev/da0e Avail: 1279/1280 MB (100%) D barracudaf State: up Device /dev/da0f Avail: 7210/7210 MB (100%) D ultrastar...

Is it expected behavior for gc() to return shrinking values as it gets called multiple times? Here's what I've got: > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 221754 6.0 467875 12.5 Vcells 3760209 28.7 14880310 113.6 > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 221760 6.0 467875 12.5 Vcells 3016206 23.1 11904247 90.9 > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 221760 6.0 467875 12.5 Vcells...

Dear colleagues, [I'm under 4-STABLE] What is the correct sequence to delete existing vinum module (for example, raid10) and do *not* use -f flags for vinum? in my case t is raid10 vovume: vinum -> l -r t V t State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8191 MB P t.p0 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 8191 MB P t.p1 S State: up Subdisks: 2 Size: 8191 MB S t.d0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4095 MB S t.d8 State: up PO: 260 kB Size: 409...

Hi, I'm getting horrible performance on my samba server, and I am unsure of the cause after reading, benchmarking, and tuning. My server is a K6-500 with 43MB of RAM, standard x86 hardware. The OS is Slackware 10.0 w/ 2.6.7 kernel I've had similar problems with the 2.4.26 kernel. I use samba version 3.0.5. I've listed my partitions b...

...lume/some/random/dir # mount host:/gluster/tmp /mnt/test mount: host:/gluster/tmp failed, reason given by server: No such file or directory I can mount it up host:/volume_name and /mnt/test/tmp exists dd if=/dev/zero of=garb bs=64K count=100 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 6553600 bytes (6.6 MB) copied, 0.068906 seconds, 95.1 MB/s dd of=garb if=/dev/zero bs=64K count=100 100+0 records in 100+0 records out 6553600 bytes (6.6 MB) copied, 0.057207 seconds, 115 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=garb bs=64K count=1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 65536000 bytes (66 MB) copied, 0.523117 seconds...

When doing ?Nile, the url for the data source is dead. It says http://www.= ssfpack.com/dkbook/ but this has changed to=20 http://www.ssfpack.com/DKbook.html Version: platform =3D i386-redhat-linux-gnu arch =3D i386 os =3D linux-gnu system =3D i386, linux-gnu status =3D major =3D 2 minor =3D 10.0 year =3D 2009 month =3D 10 day =3D 26 svn rev =3D 50208 language =3D R version.string

Hi, when doing as.double() on an object that is already a double, the object seems to be copied internally, doubling the memory requirement. See example below. Same for as.character() etc. Is this intended? Example: % R --vanilla > x <- double(1e7) > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 234019 6.3 467875 12.5 350000 9.4 Vcells 10103774 77.1 11476770 87.6 10104223 77.1 > x <- as.double(x) > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 234113 6.3 467875 12.5 350000 9.4 Vcells 10103790 77.1 2...

...ssue (see below). I looked at the old Nevada code base of onnv_147 and can''t find a reason for this happening. How can I find out what''s causing this? BTW: I was not seeing this on SolEx 11/10. Thanks, Peter *** ::memstat *** Page Summary Pages MB %Tot ------------ ---------------- ---------------- ---- Kernel 860254 3360 21% ZFS File Data 3047 11 0% Anon 38246 149 1% Exec and libs 3765 14 0% Pag...

Hi, We have a number of 4200''s setup using a combination of an SVM 4 way mirror and a ZFS raidz stripe. Each disk (of 4) is divided up like this / 6GB UFS s0 Swap 8GB s1 /var 6GB UFS s3 Metadb 50MB UFS s4 /data 48GB ZFS s5 For SVM we do a 4 way mirror on /,swap, and /var So we have 3 SVM mirrors d0=...

...the same work & creating exactly the same new objects. 2. is the modest decrease in memory consumed by new method expected? (having read R_Inferno I was, perhaps naively, expecting more of an improvement) ? or am I missing something (more than likely! ) Thanks M > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 786300 21.0 1265230 33.8 1166886 31.2 Vcells 948412 7.3 3244126 24.8 3766604 28.8 > cat("old version") Virtual size before call: 881692 user system elapsed 131.872 14.417 159.653 Virtual size after call: 899404 > 899404-881...

...lo! ------ i use 32bit.Linux(SuSe)Server, so i'm limited with 3.5Gb of memory i demonstrate, that there is times to times a problem with allocating of objects of large size, for example 0.state (no objects yet created) ------------------------------------ > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) max used (Mb) Ncells 162070 4.4 350000 9.4 350000 9.4 Vcells 59921 0.5 786432 6.0 281974 2.2 1.state: let create now a vector of large size -------------------------------------------------- > my.vector<-rnorm(10000...

...Cell 01 - Address: 00:1C:F0:58:9A:31 Channel:6 Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Quality=47/70 Signal level=-63 dBm Encryption key:on ESSID:"hrfamnet-101" Bit Rates:1 Mb/s; 2 Mb/s; 5.5 Mb/s; 11 Mb/s; 6 Mb/s 12 Mb/s; 24 Mb/s; 36 Mb/s Bit Rates:9 Mb/s; 18 Mb/s; 48 Mb/s; 54 Mb/s Mode:Master Extra:tsf=00000073d81085b2 Extra: Last beacon: 468ms ago...

...with -flto -g). I've attached leak-backend.patch, which we're using to make Intrustruments more accurate (instead of effectively leaking things onto BumpPtrAllocators, really leak them with malloc()). (I've collected this data on top of a few not-yet-committed patches to cheapen `MCSymbol` and `EmitLabelDifference()` that chop around 8% of memory off the top, but otherwise these numbers should be reproducible in ToT.) The `DIE` class is huge. Directly, it accounts for about 15% of backend memory: Bytes Used Count Symbol Name 77.87 MB 8.4% 318960 llvm::Dwar...

Hi, after upgrading to Asterisk 1.2.8 from 1.2.7.1 I got a problem with Grandstream BT100 after making an attended transfer (FLASH + NUMBER + SEND + WAIT ANSWER + TRANSFER). After the transfer, the display clears all the info except the clock, there is no dial tone, the WEB admin stops working. Incoming calls make the display light turn on but there is no ring and no callerid on the display, if the call is answered there is no a...

I''ve been messing around with Puppet on a VM on my personal desktop. It looks descent. I was wondering what kind of load this thing would have managing about 400 nodes. Does this thing require a beefy server? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To

Hi All, I ran the following lines in R: print(object.size(a <- rep(1,10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(a <- rep(3.542,10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(b <- rep("x",10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(b <- rep("xyzxyz xyz",10^6)),units="Mb") print(object.size(b <- 1:10^6),units="Mb") print(object.si...