search for: plunks

Hey, all. We're rolling out VoIP, and I'm wondering about PoE recommendations, as we're going to have to replace our current network equipment. My first inclination would be to just plunk down the cash and do a Cisco system, but I'm relatively certain that would get shot down by finance. Any recommendations for a couple-hundred-port solution with VLANs, PoE, and QoS? Don't

Hi Roland, > define <4 x float> @masked_add_1(<4 x i1> %mask, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) { > entry: > %add = fadd <4 x float> %a, %b > %sel = select <4 x i1> %mask, <4 x float> %add, <4 x float> %a > ret <4 x float> %sel > } > > I will get: > > addps %xmm1, %xmm2 > pslld $31, %xmm0 >

I need to pull user preferences on every page load of every controller and action in my app. I do this like so: @user = User.find(@session[''user''].id) @prefs = @user.prefs And it works fine in the action of one of my controllers, but I certainly don''t want to plunk it in every instance. Where do you normally put something like this? I tried putting it in the

Using dovecot 2.0.13. I went to implement relay-ctrl per directions on the Wiki, and failed. After running it down, as best as I can determine, the problem is that the $IP variable is not getting set (and thus not re-set in the script wrapper). I plunked a "set >> debug" into the script, and the only env var's that are set are as listed below (slightly sanitized for public

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > I'm trying to set up a call to printf in stacker and have managed to > confuse myself. Perhaps you can shed some light. :) > I've declared printf as a function taking a pointer to SByteTy with var > args and returning SIntTy: Sounds good. > When I set up the call, I get the following from that pesky :) verifier: Ah, but

We are testing some simple low bandwidth video and audio broadcasting using real server and client softwares. So, for quick check and simplicity, we were plunking along TESTING on an 3.2GHz XP box and I noticed frames were getting dropped on the broadcast just for resizing a window on the screen during the session. Talk about totally lame... I know this can be a big deal and start conflicting

Hi Chris, On 19/02/13 03:08, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com > <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote: >> >> > In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on >> function bodies, not on prototypes. >> > >> Yeah, I noticed that after sending this

I'm trying to set up a call to printf in stacker and have managed to confuse myself. Perhaps you can shed some light. I've declared printf as a function taking a pointer to SByteTy with var args and returning SIntTy: > // Create a function for output (int printf(format,...)) > std::vector<Type*> params; > params.push_back( PointerType::get( Type::SByteTy ) );

Hi all, I'm currently trying to figure out the best way to pass vector of booleans to other functions. Take this small example: define <4 x float> @vcmp_add(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) { entry: %cmp = fcmp olt <4 x float> %a, %b %add = fadd <4 x float> %a, %b %sel = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x float> %add, <4 x float> %a ret <4 x

...| | Delta 0 0 | | 0 R_00(i) c_0(i) | \ / \ / the text indicates that the Q-R factorization is limited to the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left. If one plunks the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left into a qr factorization, one obtains an orthogonal matrix Q that is (n_i + q) x q and a nonsingular upper triangular matrix R that is q x q. While the text describes R as a nonsingular upper triangular q x q, the matrix Q_(i) is described as...

I finally plunked down for the beta RSpec bundle and I''m working through the initial example. Although I''m a fairly experienced RSpec user, I''m stlll learning new tricks. Anyway, I''m going though the mastermind example, and everything is going well, except that I decided to also try out the Textmate bundle for Cucumber. I decided to use Ben Mabey''s

...orrectly in the comment. I want to change the Server=[Samba 3.0.14a-2] being announced to something else. I would like Server=[DataServer] as I do not want the server annoucing to the world it is running samba. How would I do this? I want to do this as when you browse shares in Windows XP its plunks "Samba 3.0.14a-2" into the task bar. Thanks in advance. --- Charles

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > > On 19/02/13 03:08, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com >> <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> > In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Morten Ofstad wrote: > Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as > packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the > LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed > that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass() > function so they can be added to the PassManager, but

On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. > > > Yeah, I noticed that after sending this patch. I modified it to check the function CI is in for that attribute. Once we have support for the `-fno-builtin-FUNCTION' flag, I expect the

Hello, Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass() function so they can be added to the PassManager, but LowerPacked doesn't have this... What should I do?

Chris Lattner wrote: > Note that packed support in LLVM is not complete yet. In > particular, here are some of the big missing pieces: > > 1. No code generators can generate vector instructions yet (SSE or > altivec, for example). This should be fairly easy to add though. > 2. The lowerpacked pass, which currently converts packed ops into their > scalar counterparts,

Hi all, MenuEngine is a small Rails engine that can generate templated drop-down DHTML menus commonly used for web site navigation. Supports creation of menus from a YAML file, from code and from pre-configured HTML. Optionally integrates with UserEngine for authorization. http://www.muermann.org/ruby/menu_engine Project page: http://rubyforge.org/projects/menuengine This is my first attempt

Hi Duncan, thanks for the hint. I tried both variants: define <4 x float> @masked_add_1(<4 x i1> signext %mask, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) define <4 x float> @masked_add_32(<4 x i32> %mask, <4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) Unfortunately, this will raise an assertion: Wrong types for attribute: zeroext signext noalias nocapture sret byval nest

...| | Delta 0 0 | | 0 R_00(i) c_0(i) | \ / \ / the text indicates that the Q-R factorization is limited to the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left. If one plunks the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left into a qr factorization, one obtains an orthogonal matrix Q that is (n_i + q) x q and a nonsingular upper triangular matrix R that is q x q. While the text describes R as a nonsingular upper triangular q x q, the matrix Q_(i) is described...