search for: plunk

Hey, all. We're rolling out VoIP, and I'm wondering about PoE recommendations, as we're going to have to replace our current network equipment. My first inclination would be to just plunk down the cash and do a Cisco system, but I'm relatively certain that would get shot down by finance. Any recommendations for a couple-hundred-port solution with VLANs, PoE, and QoS? Don't care much if it's in a single chassis or not, so long as it has Gbit uplinks. Thanks! -Ken

..., %xmm1 > movaps %xmm1, %xmm0 > ret > > While this is correct and works, I'm unhappy with the pssld. Apparently, > LLVM uses a <4 x i32> to hold the <4 x i1> while the LSB holds the mask > bit. But blendvps expects the MSB as mask bit and therefore the shift. try plunking a signext attribute on the mask parameter. That's supposed to tell the code generators that the caller passed in an all-zero or all-one value. Ciao, Duncan.

I need to pull user preferences on every page load of every controller and action in my app. I do this like so: @user = User.find(@session[''user''].id) @prefs = @user.prefs And it works fine in the action of one of my controllers, but I certainly don''t want to plunk it in every instance. Where do you normally put something like this? I tried putting it in the application controller (application.rb), but it gives me the nil object error. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Using dovecot 2.0.13. I went to implement relay-ctrl per directions on the Wiki, and failed. After running it down, as best as I can determine, the problem is that the $IP variable is not getting set (and thus not re-set in the script wrapper). I plunked a "set >> debug" into the script, and the only env var's that are set are as listed below (slightly sanitized for public display). Anyone have any ideas? I have tried both the Wiki-way, and this way: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2009-December/045139.html with identical...

...ementptr [3 x sbyte]* %_str_format_, long 0, long 0 This means: [3 x sbyte]* %_str_format_, ; Start from _str_format_ long 0, ; Get the first [3 x sbyte] array pointed to long 0 ; Get the first element in the array Also, you can try plunking the equivalent code into the C frontend (either manually or through the demo page) to see what it makes, if you get confused. :) -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

We are testing some simple low bandwidth video and audio broadcasting using real server and client softwares. So, for quick check and simplicity, we were plunking along TESTING on an 3.2GHz XP box and I noticed frames were getting dropped on the broadcast just for resizing a window on the screen during the session. Talk about totally lame... I know this can be a big deal and start conflicting opinions yet I need some experienced perspective please? Can...

...If I build with -fno-builtin-fputs, why would an attribute > be added to a call to printf? there are two parts to libcall simplification: (1) recognizing that a call is to a function we understand (eg: printf); (2) generating a new call to a library function (eg: synthesizing memcpy). Plunking an attribute on a call to say "this isn't the printf function you know" seems kind of useful to me, even if it only takes care of (1). Ciao, Duncan.

I'm trying to set up a call to printf in stacker and have managed to confuse myself. Perhaps you can shed some light. I've declared printf as a function taking a pointer to SByteTy with var args and returning SIntTy: > // Create a function for output (int printf(format,...)) > std::vector<Type*> params; > params.push_back( PointerType::get( Type::SByteTy ) );

Hi all, I'm currently trying to figure out the best way to pass vector of booleans to other functions. Take this small example: define <4 x float> @vcmp_add(<4 x float> %a, <4 x float> %b) { entry: %cmp = fcmp olt <4 x float> %a, %b %add = fadd <4 x float> %a, %b %sel = select <4 x i1> %cmp, <4 x float> %add, <4 x float> %a ret <4 x

...| | Delta 0 0 | | 0 R_00(i) c_0(i) | \ / \ / the text indicates that the Q-R factorization is limited to the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left. If one plunks the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left into a qr factorization, one obtains an orthogonal matrix Q that is (n_i + q) x q and a nonsingular upper triangular matrix R that is q x q. While the text describes R as a nonsingular upper triangular q x q, the matrix Q_(i) is described as...

I finally plunked down for the beta RSpec bundle and I''m working through the initial example. Although I''m a fairly experienced RSpec user, I''m stlll learning new tricks. Anyway, I''m going though the mastermind example, and everything is going well, except that I decided to a...

...orrectly in the comment. I want to change the Server=[Samba 3.0.14a-2] being announced to something else. I would like Server=[DataServer] as I do not want the server annoucing to the world it is running samba. How would I do this? I want to do this as when you browse shares in Windows XP its plunks "Samba 3.0.14a-2" into the task bar. Thanks in advance. --- Charles

...t; attribute >> be added to a call to printf? >> > > there are two parts to libcall simplification: > > (1) recognizing that a call is to a function we understand (eg: printf); > (2) generating a new call to a library function (eg: synthesizing > memcpy). > > Plunking an attribute on a call to say "this isn't the printf function you > know" > seems kind of useful to me, even if it only takes care of (1). > And what I'm wondering is if you could could annotate two cases in the frontend: a) Mark a call to a function 'foo' as...

...you up and running quickly and get you the performance you are obviously after. If backwards compatibility with old hardware is an issue, revisiting the lower packed pass would make sense. Let me know what you think. In the very short term, the hook exposed to create the lower packed pass can be plunked into the X86TargetMachine and get intra function packed types working for you. > PS. Chris, thanks for the feedback on the memory cleanup patch - I'm a > bit busy getting LLVM integrated in our app now, but I will incorporate > your suggestions and submit a proper patch soon... No...

On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. > > > Yeah, I noticed that after sending this patch. I modified it to check the function CI is in for that attribute. Once we have support for the `-fno-builtin-FUNCTION' flag, I expect the

Hello, Our software uses 4 x float vectors a lot, and I pass these to LLVM as packed types - but when I do the JIT compile it seems that the LowerPacked pass is never run so the code generation fails. I noticed that most other passes have a header file with a public createXXXPass() function so they can be added to the PassManager, but LowerPacked doesn't have this... What should I do?

...the > lower packed pass would make sense. Is it easy to add intrinsics to do things like dot product of packed types using SSE instructions? That's probably all I need... > Let me know what you think. In the very short term, the hook exposed to > create the lower packed pass can be plunked into the X86TargetMachine and > get intra function packed types working for you. The patch you did was missing the actual implementation of createLowerPackedPass, so I'm including my own differences -- I guess you don't want to apply the changes to X86TargetMachine as I'm the on...

Hi all, MenuEngine is a small Rails engine that can generate templated drop-down DHTML menus commonly used for web site navigation. Supports creation of menus from a YAML file, from code and from pre-configured HTML. Optionally integrates with UserEngine for authorization. http://www.muermann.org/ruby/menu_engine Project page: http://rubyforge.org/projects/menuengine This is my first attempt

...t; > ret > > > > While this is correct and works, I'm unhappy with the pssld. Apparently, > > LLVM uses a <4 x i32> to hold the <4 x i1> while the LSB holds the mask > > bit. But blendvps expects the MSB as mask bit and therefore the shift. > > try plunking a signext attribute on the mask parameter. That's supposed to > tell the code generators that the caller passed in an all-zero or all-one > value. > > Ciao, Duncan. > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.ed...

...| | Delta 0 0 | | 0 R_00(i) c_0(i) | \ / \ / the text indicates that the Q-R factorization is limited to the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left. If one plunks the first q columns of the augmented matrix on the left into a qr factorization, one obtains an orthogonal matrix Q that is (n_i + q) x q and a nonsingular upper triangular matrix R that is q x q. While the text describes R as a nonsingular upper triangular q x q, the matrix Q_(i) is described...