search for: plumbing

I opened a bug report earlier today but it doesn''t seem to have been added to the bugs database. I''m posting here in case one of the Crossbow developers might see it and confirm this behavior. Description Duplicate packets are generated whenever an aggregate is introduced into the network configuration. We''ve ruled out switch ports and physical bge interfaces as

redirecting to crossbow-discuss... On 03/12/09 15:17, Andrew Gabriel wrote: > In snv_108, I''m playing with creating a vnic over an etherstub, and I > might not be doing it right, but the behaviour I''m seeing doesn''t look > right either. > > So this is what I did... > > # dladm create-etherstub estub0 > # dladm create-vnic -l estub0 vnic0 > #

...ntext of the content of my application. I have created an analyzer using the following: StemFilter.new StopFilter.new( LowerCaseFilter.new(StandardTokenizer.new(text)), @stop_words ) This has been pretty good so far, however, I really would like to get a search for "plumber" match "plumbing" at maybe a lower score than it would match "plumbers". The thing is that plumber(s) is filtered to "plumber" and plumbing is filtered to plumb, so it doesn''t match. Is there any way to tweak the filter to be able to do these matches? I would like to match all noun...

Hi, how can ip instances be used with vlans ? Is that possible ? I don''t know how to configure this, if I only have one interface (e.g. bge0), and want to assign e.g. bge1000 to a zone. Any cookbooks available ? Thanks Detlef

So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have... e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10 vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22 I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works. I stop the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work. I start the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works. Is this a new feature with

Hi Miguel, I have been using Samba AD DC 4.9.1 for a little bit 6 months now. Very stable. Never heard of any stability problems concerning GPOs. There are no problems with GPOs, but as I found out, you must give the GPO changes time to take effect (30 minutes). I haven't found out how to force GPO updates under Samba yet, but that's probably due to my lack of time and inherent

Who am I to say this? I am only a lowly user and would-be admin, but it seems to me that one of the most useful features of an AD environment, GPOs, is not fully trust-able under Samba because of instability and ensuing fear, before and after each update, related to sysvol and who knows what. I still love you, though.

...9a62303e85bcea868eb47 tag: tip user: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> date: Thu Jul 13 11:51:38 2006 -0400 files: drivers/xen/privcmd/Makefile drivers/xen/privcmd/compat_privcmd.c fs/compat_ioctl.c include/xen/public/privcmd.h description: [ppc] ioctl32() compat plumbing for xen calls The following patch deals with xen ioctl32() data structures that contain pointer that are consumed _by_ Linux and not Xen. Snuck in a few struct/typedef fixes that were missed before. Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> diff -r dd6f9da2ed0bcf52deb9f48e24ae56...

...ile/mail server for the local lan. What I''d like to do is UFS dump the OS images into xVM images and connect them up with the same network topology. I have enough hardware to put 6 ethernets into the new box. So my questions are: 1) Can I dedicate an interface to an xVM instance without plumbing an IP on the host Sol 11 box such that I can run IPFilter in xVM as a FW and not have that interface used as an attack vector to the host? I would then dedicate 3 interfaces to xVM instances. 2 interfaces to the first Solaris 10 instance, 1 for the connection to the Internet, and the other to a c...

I have installed on a VirtualBox vm the crossbow ISO Now I''m trying to create the network map described in the "getting started" pdf I have this situation: On global zone, I have the real NIC: e1000g0 with ip 10.0.2.15 (VirtualBox NAT this IP, I can get web access with it) I have created an etherstub (etherstub n?2) with 2 vnics (vnic5 and vnic6), I''ve plumbed

Hi, I''m trying to work out a solution for multiple zones with exclusive IP stacks, and existing on the same VLAN. For example, I have 3 zones on the same subnet (lets say 10.10.10.0/24), and want to put them in the same VLAN (let''s say 20). If they weren''t zones, I would plumb up e1000g20000 or equiv on each and off we go, but with zones and exclusive IP stack, I

Super minor nitpicks: On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 16:22 +1000, Sam McNally wrote: > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > [sammc at chromium.org: > - rebased > - removed polling-related changes > - moved the calls to drm_dp_cec_(un)set_edid() into the next patch > ] > Signed-off-by: Sam

The network fails for the zone when i try to setup it with ip-type exclusive. Its on a vmware server 1.0.2 using a emulated e1000g, this is the only current way i have got to test it with :( Any ideas on how to find out what the problem is? Is it that the emulation done by vmware can''t do this? I think it would be useful for this to work in vmware, as you can add many virtual nics to

...plug is still a work in > progress; I don't know if qemu 1.6 will support it, or if you'll have to > wait for qemu 1.7. Meanwhile, you can try using 'setvcpus gentookvm > --guest 4' to use the guest agent (assuming you have qemu-ga running in > the guest, and the proper plumbing of the guest agent channel in your > domain XML) to use the guest to take vcpus on- or offline. Tried that with no luck so far. virsh # setvcpus gentookvm --guest 2 error: internal error: unable to execute QEMU agent command 'guest-get-vcpus': The command guest-get-vcpus has not been f...

How do I create a vnic that represents the factory assigned MAC address of my physical nic? The bge device in my system (x2100) appears to support 4 MAC addresses. The driver reserves the first as the ''primary/default'' address and allows manipulation of the other three via the MAC_CAPAB_MULTIADDRESS interface. I''d like to use vnics on this system, as I have Xen guest

On 01/09/2020 08:22, Sam McNally wrote: > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > [sammc at chromium.org: > - rebased > - removed polling-related changes > - moved the calls to drm_dp_cec_(un)set_edid() into the next patch > ] > Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc at chromium.org>

...y in LLVM. llvm-mca has recently been split <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37696> into its core part and the tool part. - The core part simulates the execution of a basic block of machine instructions as modeled by the llvm SchedModel. - The tool part deals with the plumbing and interacting with the user. The core part can be used by parts of LLVM that deal with cost modeling (e.g. scheduling and vectorization). MCA provides a more realistic target for optimization than the heuristics typically used to drive these passes. We think that using approaches based on fine-...

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > It's head of my virtio-next tree. Hey Rusty, While we have your attention --- what's your opinion about adding TRIM support to virtio-blk. I understand that you're starting an OASIS standardization process for virtio --- what does that mean vis-a-vis a patch to plumb discard support through virtio-blk?

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > It's head of my virtio-next tree. Hey Rusty, While we have your attention --- what's your opinion about adding TRIM support to virtio-blk. I understand that you're starting an OASIS standardization process for virtio --- what does that mean vis-a-vis a patch to plumb discard support through virtio-blk?

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:12 AM Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:11:04AM +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > Unfortunately, instead of fixing/refactoring the whole bash networking > > script mess, another new project was started instead, called > > systemd-networkd :-) > > Actually, I'm sad that