search for: plumbed

I opened a bug report earlier today but it doesn''t seem to have been added to the bugs database. I''m posting here in case one of the Crossbow developers might see it and confirm this behavior. Description Duplicate packets are generated whenever an aggregate is introduced into the network configuration. We''ve ruled out switch ports and physical bge interfaces as

...c0 > # ifconfig vnic0 plumb > # ifconfig vnic0 192.168.128.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast + up > # > > That seems to work, and I had virtualbox also attach to vnic0 and > traffic passes through vnic0 OK. > > Then I reboot. I wasn''t expecting the interfaced to be plumbed > anymore, but I was expecting the vnic0 and estub0 to still be there. > They aren''t: > > # ifconfig vnic0 plumb > ifconfig: SIOCSLIFNAME for ip: vnic0: no such interface > # dladm show-etherstub > # dladm show-vnic > # > > Except maybe they are: > > #...

Hello all, I am new to the list, but I have been using ferret for a little bit already. I would first like to thank Dave for all his work on ferret. I had a few questions that I haven''t been able to figure out after messing around with ferret and going through the documentation. StemFilter ------ I am trying to improve the quality of my searches in context of the content of my

Hi, how can ip instances be used with vlans ? Is that possible ? I don''t know how to configure this, if I only have one interface (e.g. bge0), and want to assign e.g. bge1000 to a zone. Any cookbooks available ? Thanks Detlef

So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have... e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10 vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22 I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works. I stop the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work. I start the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works. Is this a new feature with

Hi Miguel, I have been using Samba AD DC 4.9.1 for a little bit 6 months now. Very stable. Never heard of any stability problems concerning GPOs. There are no problems with GPOs, but as I found out, you must give the GPO changes time to take effect (30 minutes). I haven't found out how to force GPO updates under Samba yet, but that's probably due to my lack of time and inherent

Who am I to say this? I am only a lowly user and would-be admin, but it seems to me that one of the most useful features of an AD environment, GPOs, is not fully trust-able under Samba because of instability and ensuing fear, before and after each update, related to sysvol and who knows what. I still love you, though.

changeset: 30726:2a6fda4e7dde1a0a5d29a62303e85bcea868eb47 tag: tip user: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> date: Thu Jul 13 11:51:38 2006 -0400 files: drivers/xen/privcmd/Makefile drivers/xen/privcmd/compat_privcmd.c fs/compat_ioctl.c include/xen/public/privcmd.h description: [ppc] ioctl32() compat plumbing for xen calls The following patch deals with xen

...the 2nd instance and the host. Ideally it, if this could be done as above, It would be cool if I could somehow virtually plumb two virtual interfaces between xVM instances for high speed communications w/o having to use physical hardware, and for increased performance, but again, without having IP plumbed on the host to use as an attack vector. Any thoughts? (Yes I know this is somewhat convoluted perhaps, and eventually once Solaris 11 is officially released I''ll consider using zones and IP instances, but until then I''d like not to have to reconfigure two highly customized Solar...

...the network map described in the "getting started" pdf I have this situation: On global zone, I have the real NIC: e1000g0 with ip 10.0.2.15 (VirtualBox NAT this IP, I can get web access with it) I have created an etherstub (etherstub n?2) with 2 vnics (vnic5 and vnic6), I''ve plumbed vnic5 in the global zone with ip 192.160.50.50 I have other etherstub (etherstub n1) withi the vnics 2, 3 and 4 I have created an etherstub2-zone, witch uses the vnic 6 to connect with the global zone. At this point, no problem at all But know I want to add a vnic of etherstub 1 to the etherstu...

Hi, I''m trying to work out a solution for multiple zones with exclusive IP stacks, and existing on the same VLAN. For example, I have 3 zones on the same subnet (lets say 10.10.10.0/24), and want to put them in the same VLAN (let''s say 20). If they weren''t zones, I would plumb up e1000g20000 or equiv on each and off we go, but with zones and exclusive IP stack, I

Super minor nitpicks: On Tue, 2020-09-01 at 16:22 +1000, Sam McNally wrote: > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > [sammc at chromium.org: > - rebased > - removed polling-related changes > - moved the calls to drm_dp_cec_(un)set_edid() into the next patch > ] > Signed-off-by: Sam

The network fails for the zone when i try to setup it with ip-type exclusive. Its on a vmware server 1.0.2 using a emulated e1000g, this is the only current way i have got to test it with :( Any ideas on how to find out what the problem is? Is it that the emulation done by vmware can''t do this? I think it would be useful for this to work in vmware, as you can add many virtual nics to

Am 09.08.13 15:09, schrieb Eric Blake: > On 08/09/2013 06:26 AM, Thomas Stein wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Does someone know in what state setvcpu command is? >> >> I get: >> >> virsh # setvcpus gentookvm 4 >> error: internal error: cannot change vcpu count of this domain >> >> and >> >> error : qemuDomainHotplugVcpus:4087 :

How do I create a vnic that represents the factory assigned MAC address of my physical nic? The bge device in my system (x2100) appears to support 4 MAC addresses. The driver reserves the first as the ''primary/default'' address and allows manipulation of the other three via the MAC_CAPAB_MULTIADDRESS interface. I''d like to use vnics on this system, as I have Xen guest

On 01/09/2020 08:22, Sam McNally wrote: > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil at cisco.com> > [sammc at chromium.org: > - rebased > - removed polling-related changes > - moved the calls to drm_dp_cec_(un)set_edid() into the next patch > ] > Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc at chromium.org>

(on the correct mailing list) Hi all, tl;dr: We'd like to propose moving tools/llvm-mca/lib into lib/MCA and create a new MCA library in LLVM. llvm-mca has recently been split <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37696> into its core part and the tool part. - The core part simulates the execution of a basic block of machine instructions as modeled by the llvm SchedModel.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > It's head of my virtio-next tree. Hey Rusty, While we have your attention --- what's your opinion about adding TRIM support to virtio-blk. I understand that you're starting an OASIS standardization process for virtio --- what does that mean vis-a-vis a patch to plumb discard support through virtio-blk?

On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 02:22:50PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > It's head of my virtio-next tree. Hey Rusty, While we have your attention --- what's your opinion about adding TRIM support to virtio-blk. I understand that you're starting an OASIS standardization process for virtio --- what does that mean vis-a-vis a patch to plumb discard support through virtio-blk?

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:12 AM Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:11:04AM +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > Unfortunately, instead of fixing/refactoring the whole bash networking > > script mess, another new project was started instead, called > > systemd-networkd :-) > > Actually, I'm sad that