Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "plmdvi".
Did you mean:
plmdvy
2009 Oct 14
2
[LLVMdev] undoing the pthread changes
Pthread search changes broke freebsd so they are coming out until something
better can be done
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091014/238683da/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: undopthread.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size:
2009 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] undoing the pthread changes
I got two arguments the wrong way round, this is the fixed one
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Pthread search changes broke freebsd so they are coming out until something
> better can be done
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2009 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Haiku Triple support
support for triple in haiku
it touches lib/Support/Triple.cpp
and include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091016/049eccbe/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: haikutriple.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
2009 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Haiku Triple support
Greatest appologies that had some cruft in it, let me send the cleaned one
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> wrote:
> support for triple in haiku
>
> it touches lib/Support/Triple.cpp
> and include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2009 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] strace for whole-program bitcodes
--emit-llvm, if not conflict
>>> Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> 10/30/2009 11:11 AM >>>
--emit-llvm??
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well.
Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one?
Viktor
2009 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] haiku comapatability configure regenerated
This is a patch for the regenerated configure related files.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091013/eb1ed755/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: haiku.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 11388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] AuroraUX detection in configure.ac
for evocallaghan he needed his configure.ac changes autogened.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091013/a6819944/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: auroraux.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 9004 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] strace for whole-program bitcodes
--emit-llvm??
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov
<vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com>wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this
> one as well.
> Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one?
>
> Viktor
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] opt -std-compile-opts breaks tail calls
I've run into some issues with tail calls in the past, make sure you
are doing the following:
1. Call should be marked with tail (obviously)
2. Next statement after tail call should be 'return void'
3. Use fast call convention for tail calls
4. Make sure the function you are calling doesn't use the 'noreturn' attribute.
5. Turn on tail calls in llc (if using the static
2009 Nov 12
4
[LLVMdev] opt -std-compile-opts breaks tail calls
tail calls are only implemented for fastcall calling convention if i remeber
right from my inquiries.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091112/e8f1dd2a/attachment.html>
2009 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] Strange error for libLLVMCore.a
you want to use the execution engine and JIT but do not put them in the
llvm-config line??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091106/d26a0a02/attachment.html>
2010 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding
to me the name implies that it creates a handle to the type given, i guess
if you look at it in context of the ocaml conversion functions some people
may think otherwise.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:49 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote:
> everyone--
>
> I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type
> handle from a type, rather than vice
2010 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] folding x * 0 = 0
By the way:
x * 1 = 1
is one optimisation I never want to see in llvm please.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100304/e2bf0cd7/attachment.html>
2010 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: folding x * 0 = 0
sorry forgot to change address :/
Rob:
from original post:
I would expect the following optimizations, but didn't find them in the
code:
x + 0 = x
x * 0 = 0
x * 1 = 1
x * -1 = -x
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100304/ab3a1b7a/attachment.html>
2010 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: hexcode from llvm
sorry keep forgetting to send to list instead of last person who replied :(
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM, JayaSus <jayasnair at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill Wendling.
> I am trying to get a hexcode as shown below for mips processor using llvm
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <main>:
> 0: 27bdffe8 addiu sp,sp,-24
> 4:
2010 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] Why google-perftools fails on the JITted code?
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Yuri wrote:
>
>> Now I see that JITted code doesn't have standard prolog, on x86 each
>> procedure instead begins with 'sub $0x4,%esp'.
>>
>> Is there an option to make JIT generate regular prologs?
>
> Try turning off frame