search for: plmdvy

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "plmdvy".

Did you mean: lmdvr
2009 Oct 14
2
[LLVMdev] undoing the pthread changes
Pthread search changes broke freebsd so they are coming out until something better can be done -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091014/238683da/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: undopthread.patch Type: text/x-patch Size:
2009 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] undoing the pthread changes
I got two arguments the wrong way round, this is the fixed one On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> wrote: > Pthread search changes broke freebsd so they are coming out until something > better can be done > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091014/e85b56d4/attachmen...
2009 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Haiku Triple support
support for triple in haiku it touches lib/Support/Triple.cpp and include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091016/049eccbe/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: haikutriple.patch Type: application/octet-stream
2009 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Haiku Triple support
Greatest appologies that had some cruft in it, let me send the cleaned one On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> wrote: > support for triple in haiku > > it touches lib/Support/Triple.cpp > and include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091016/f...
2009 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] strace for whole-program bitcodes
--emit-llvm, if not conflict >>> Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> 10/30/2009 11:11 AM >>> --emit-llvm?? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com> wrote: Hello everyone, I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well. Just need an option name. Coul...
2009 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] haiku comapatability configure regenerated
This is a patch for the regenerated configure related files. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091013/eb1ed755/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: haiku.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 11388 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2009 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] AuroraUX detection in configure.ac
for evocallaghan he needed his configure.ac changes autogened. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091013/a6819944/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: auroraux.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 9004 bytes Desc: not available URL:
2009 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] strace for whole-program bitcodes
--emit-llvm?? On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com>wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this > one as well. > Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one? > > Viktor > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] opt -std-compile-opts breaks tail calls
...39; statement. In my case this caused my compiled programs to segfault if the llvm optimiser was run on them. I haven't fully investigated this yet so not really sure if it is specific to my case or applies universally but it sure did cause me some pains for a while. 2009/11/12 Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com>: > tail calls are only implemented for fastcall calling convention if i remeber > right from my inquiries. > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://...
2009 Nov 12
4
[LLVMdev] opt -std-compile-opts breaks tail calls
tail calls are only implemented for fastcall calling convention if i remeber right from my inquiries. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091112/e8f1dd2a/attachment.html>
2009 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] Strange error for libLLVMCore.a
you want to use the execution engine and JIT but do not put them in the llvm-config line?? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091106/d26a0a02/attachment.html>
2010 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding
to me the name implies that it creates a handle to the type given, i guess if you look at it in context of the ocaml conversion functions some people may think otherwise. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:49 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote: > everyone-- > > I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type > handle from a type, rather than vice
2010 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] folding x * 0 = 0
By the way: x * 1 = 1 is one optimisation I never want to see in llvm please. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100304/e2bf0cd7/attachment.html>
2010 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: folding x * 0 = 0
sorry forgot to change address :/ Rob: from original post: I would expect the following optimizations, but didn't find them in the code: x + 0 = x x * 0 = 0 x * 1 = 1 x * -1 = -x -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100304/ab3a1b7a/attachment.html>
2010 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: hexcode from llvm
sorry keep forgetting to send to list instead of last person who replied :( On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM, JayaSus <jayasnair at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Bill Wendling. > I am trying to get a hexcode as shown below for mips processor using llvm > > Disassembly of section .text: > > 00000000 <main>: >   0:   27bdffe8        addiu   sp,sp,-24 >   4:  
2010 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] Why google-perftools fails on the JITted code?
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Yuri wrote: > >> Now I see that JITted code doesn't have standard prolog, on x86 each >> procedure instead begins with 'sub    $0x4,%esp'. >> >> Is there an option to make JIT generate regular prologs? > > Try turning off frame