Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "plmdvy".
Did you mean:
lmdvr
2009 Oct 14
2
[LLVMdev] undoing the pthread changes
Pthread search changes broke freebsd so they are coming out until something
better can be done
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091014/238683da/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: undopthread.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size:
2009 Oct 14
0
[LLVMdev] undoing the pthread changes
I got two arguments the wrong way round, this is the fixed one
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Pthread search changes broke freebsd so they are coming out until something
> better can be done
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091014/e85b56d4/attachmen...
2009 Oct 16
2
[LLVMdev] Haiku Triple support
support for triple in haiku
it touches lib/Support/Triple.cpp
and include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091016/049eccbe/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: haikutriple.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
2009 Oct 16
0
[LLVMdev] Haiku Triple support
Greatest appologies that had some cruft in it, let me send the cleaned one
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> wrote:
> support for triple in haiku
>
> it touches lib/Support/Triple.cpp
> and include/llvm/ADT/Triple.h
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091016/f...
2009 Oct 30
0
[LLVMdev] strace for whole-program bitcodes
--emit-llvm, if not conflict
>>> Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com> 10/30/2009 11:11 AM >>>
--emit-llvm??
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov <vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this one as well.
Just need an option name. Coul...
2009 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] haiku comapatability configure regenerated
This is a patch for the regenerated configure related files.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091013/eb1ed755/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: haiku.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 11388 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] AuroraUX detection in configure.ac
for evocallaghan he needed his configure.ac changes autogened.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091013/a6819944/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: auroraux.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 9004 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Oct 30
2
[LLVMdev] strace for whole-program bitcodes
--emit-llvm??
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Viktor Kutuzov
<vkutuzov at accesssoftek.com>wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm working on passing parameters for gold/LTO plug-in and could add this
> one as well.
> Just need an option name. Could anybody suggest one?
>
> Viktor
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Lewycky" <nicholas at
2009 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] opt -std-compile-opts breaks tail calls
...39; statement. In my
case this caused my compiled programs to segfault if the llvm
optimiser was run on them.
I haven't fully investigated this yet so not really sure if it is
specific to my case or applies universally but it sure did cause me
some pains for a while.
2009/11/12 Paul Davey <plmdvy at gmail.com>:
> tail calls are only implemented for fastcall calling convention if i remeber
> right from my inquiries.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://...
2009 Nov 12
4
[LLVMdev] opt -std-compile-opts breaks tail calls
tail calls are only implemented for fastcall calling convention if i remeber
right from my inquiries.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091112/e8f1dd2a/attachment.html>
2009 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] Strange error for libLLVMCore.a
you want to use the execution engine and JIT but do not put them in the
llvm-config line??
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20091106/d26a0a02/attachment.html>
2010 Feb 07
0
[LLVMdev] another minor problem with the ocaml binding
to me the name implies that it creates a handle to the type given, i guess
if you look at it in context of the ocaml conversion functions some people
may think otherwise.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:49 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote:
> everyone--
>
> I notice that Llvm.llvm_handle_to_type is actually defined to create a type
> handle from a type, rather than vice
2010 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] folding x * 0 = 0
By the way:
x * 1 = 1
is one optimisation I never want to see in llvm please.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100304/e2bf0cd7/attachment.html>
2010 Mar 04
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: folding x * 0 = 0
sorry forgot to change address :/
Rob:
from original post:
I would expect the following optimizations, but didn't find them in the
code:
x + 0 = x
x * 0 = 0
x * 1 = 1
x * -1 = -x
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100304/ab3a1b7a/attachment.html>
2010 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: hexcode from llvm
sorry keep forgetting to send to list instead of last person who replied :(
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:18 PM, JayaSus <jayasnair at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bill Wendling.
> I am trying to get a hexcode as shown below for mips processor using llvm
>
> Disassembly of section .text:
>
> 00000000 <main>:
> 0: 27bdffe8 addiu sp,sp,-24
> 4:
2010 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] Why google-perftools fails on the JITted code?
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 4:35 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Yuri wrote:
>
>> Now I see that JITted code doesn't have standard prolog, on x86 each
>> procedure instead begins with 'sub $0x4,%esp'.
>>
>> Is there an option to make JIT generate regular prologs?
>
> Try turning off frame