search for: plentli

Even though they make the cards and advertise that they support data modes, digium won't support data mode on the $500 card they sold to me, so I must turn to the list. Has anyone configured a T100P to use a T1 strictly as bandwidth? Is there a HOWTO somewhere? Wiki has nothing I could find. I've got plently of public IPs I can assign to it but don't know how. Thanks, Matthew -----

Hi All, I''m trying to create a contended section of bandwidth using IMQ. I have the imq0 device up and running, with traffic passing through it. Firstly, I need to throttle the entire device imq0 to 2mbit/s. I would then like to add throttle rules for individual IP addresses, allowing them to pass up to 512kbit/s each, as long as imq0 has not reached its 2mbit/s. The configuration

Has anybody found a fix for the Access 2003 printing? I've got a couple of work arounds but neither is a good long term solution. 1) Set the default printer to something other then a Samba print queue. 2) Map the Samba print queue to a dos LPT port. Thanks, Derek To boldly go where I surely don't belong. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed...

Hi Garming, > > If you don't make much progress on your own, one thing you could do is > turn up the logging level and send in some logs and network traces > (and the steps you took). This is usually the easiest way to diagnose > any obvious issues and gives a much better sense of what is actually > happening. sorry to come back to you so late... It seems inded to be some

Hello to All. I'd want to use a one-way ANOVA. This means that I have only one factor, with, lets say, 5 levels. I made a dataframe, called "DATA", with two Columns: A, that is my response, and it is "class numerical". B, that defines the different levels of my factor, and it is "class factor". If I want to use a fixed effect model, I know that the formula I have

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 9:00 PM Shian Su <su.s at wehi.edu.au> wrote: > > Thanks Simon, > > I will take note of the sensible default for core usage. I?m trying to achieve small scale parallelism, where tasks take 1-5 seconds and make fuller use of consumer hardware. Its not a HPC-worthy computation but even laptops these days come with 4 cores and I don?t see a reason to not make

Thanks Simon, I will take note of the sensible default for core usage. I?m trying to achieve small scale parallelism, where tasks take 1-5 seconds and make fuller use of consumer hardware. Its not a HPC-worthy computation but even laptops these days come with 4 cores and I don?t see a reason to not make use of it. The goal for the current piece of code I?m working on is to bootstrap many

Hi Garming, > As far I know, all this should work as you would expect. Quite recently, > Andrew Bartlett and I went about testing some of the behaviour of the > KDC and confirming behaviour such as RODC ticket forwarding. thanks for the input. It gives me hope to dig deeper! I have some more time to spend on this issue today, I gonna try some more scenario. > The one thing to check

3 things that should be part of the main Rails tree: http://www.redhillconsulting.com.au/rails_plugins.html Views? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Morning all... I have a Dedicated server in a data center in Germany, and it has 2 3TB drives, but only software RAID. I have got them to install VMWare ESXi and so far everything is going ok... I have the 2 drives as standard data stores... But i am paranoid... So, i installed Nexenta as a VM, gave it a small disk to boot off and 2 1Tb disks on separate physical drives... I have created a