search for: plac

...'ve succeeded in plotting a Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve by using the following: > my_var.bygroup <- survfit(Surv (Survival, Censored==0) ~ TreatmentGroup, data=TestData) > plot(my_var.bygroup, conf.int=FALSE, col=c("black","grey"), lty=1:2, legend.text=c("Placebo","Prednisolone"), main="dKaplan-Meier Survival Curve", xlab="Time (months)", ylab="Probability of Survival") That produces this: http://www.wittongilbert.free-online.co.uk/RGraph.jpg All of that is very nice so far. The I followed bits and piec...

...de faire un projet utilisant Affymatrix mais j'ai un probl?me ? t?l?charger un package depuis R: une fois que je t?l?charge le package et je demande de faire "rma" ca sort l'erreur suivante et je n'ai aucune id?e de comment je pourrais faire. > library(preprocessCore) > plac.rma <- rma(plac.new) Background correcting Normalizing Calculating Expression Errore in rma(plac.new) : function 'R_subColSummarize_medianpolish_log' not provided by package 'preprocessCore' Est-ce que vous avez un conseil ? me donner? J'ai un projet ? finir et je suis com...

A monsieur Andrew Je suis ?tudiant en fin de cycle de formation en infomatique ? l'institut Africain d'informatique de Libreville.J'?tais sur vos sites et je suis persuad?s que vous ?tes la personne la bien plac?e pour m'orienter et m'aider sur un sujet concernant "l'authentification linux des sessions windows".Ainsi on me demande de concevoir et de mettre en oeuvre un syst?me permettant aux utilisateurs windows d'avoir acc?s aux ressorces linux et que les utilisateurs linux puiss...

...did not succeed. Invalidmessageset: 1181461470:-1181461446. ou 1181461444:* ou 1181461444:-1181461445 with Squirrelmail : SquirrelMail: ERREUR ERREUR: Le serveur IMAP n'a pas trouv? le message requis. La cause probable est que votre liste de messages n'est pas ? jour et le message a ?t? d?plac? ou supprim? (?ventuellement par un autre programme qui utilise la m?me bo?te aux lettres). traduction : IMAP server doesn't find the message Your message list isnt up to day or has been delated or moved.... With the mail -f command I can read messages and with POP3 protocol and Thunderbird...

I just finished ripping a bunch of FLAC files from CDs through CDex by using an external encoder, sending the wav file to stdin (FLAC 1.1.2) and I get this weird 1/2 second repeat right at the end of the song that is from a second or two from the end... for example, Shania Twain sings "I feel like a woman!... a wom..." ... I get that extra "a wom..." at the end. Every song I

Bonjour, je voulais savoir si il est possible d''installer les fichiers wxruby2 ailleurs que dans les dossiers habituel et sans se servir de rubygems? car j''aimerais pouvoir les déplacés. Merci Sebastien _______________________________________________ wxruby-users mailing list wxruby-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wxruby-users

...3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> <o:SmartTagType = namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"City"/> <o:SmartTagType = namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"place"/> <!--[if !mso]> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roma...

...; > > Please just add this assertion. If it fires we'll have a test case and a > concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove > it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing > test to explain why it was there in the first plac . > The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the referenced DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. For that case, we can't assume ref4 should be used. I don't think we can enforce that all DIEs must be added to a parent before calling addDIEEntry. F...

...Please just add this assertion. If it fires we'll have a test case and a >> concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove >> it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing >> test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >> > > The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the referenced > DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. > OK, sorry - I should've read your description of the assertion more carefully. I believe the assertion you added wasn't the rig...

...add this assertion. If it fires we'll have a test case and a >>> concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove >>> it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing >>> test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >>> >> >> The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the referenced >> DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. >> > > OK, sorry - I should've read your description of the assertion more > carefully. I believe the asse...

...ertion. If it fires we'll have a test case and >>>> a concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove >>>> it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing >>>> test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >>>> >>> >>> The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the referenced >>> DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. >>> >> >> OK, sorry - I should've read your description of the assertion more >&g...

...t fires we'll have a test case and >>>>> a concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove >>>>> it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing >>>>> test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >>>>> >>>> >>>> The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the referenced >>>> DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. >>>> >>> >>> OK, sorry - I should've read your description...

...t fires we'll have a test case and >>>>> a concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove >>>>> it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing >>>>> test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >>>>> >>>> >>>> The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the referenced >>>> DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. >>>> >>> >>> OK, sorry - I should've read your description...

...39;ll have a test case >>>>>> and a concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone >>>>>> remove it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a >>>>>> failing test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the >>>>> referenced DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK, sorry - I should...

...he same CU as DIE A. > Please just add this assertion. If it fires we'll have a test case and a concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone remove it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a failing test to explain why it was there in the first place. > > Let me know which one you prefer. > > Do you have any comments on the ref_addr patch (the 1st patch of the two)? > Nothing much - I wouldn't mind Eric taking a look (& would rather you not commit this until you're committing the second patch, since it's other...

...test case >>>>>>> and a concrete justification for this complexity such that should anyone >>>>>>> remove it later because it looked unnecessary, they'll at least have a >>>>>>> failing test to explain why it was there in the first plac . >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The assertion fails even with a simple testing case when the >>>>>> referenced DIE has an owner and the DIE itself does not have an owner. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>&gt...

I'm backing up a bunch of Windows machines onto a linux box (FC3, Samba 3.0.8-0.pre1.3) and it works great... UNLESS some idiot disconnects or shuts down his computer while I'm running the backup, and then my rsync command hangs while trying to copy the files from that computer's smbmounted drive to the server. Isn't there some sort of way to soft mount the samba share or

I'm trying to see what computer is accessing certain files through samba, and the SWAT status page is a useful tool for that. Problem is that for some computers, only the IP address shows, not the NetBIOS name. This is only a problem with certain computers. Since we're using DHCP on many computers I don't always know off the top of my head what computer has any given IP