search for: pitas

Hi All, Trying to get familiar with dplyr so I have a basic question: How to summarise sum(Values) per species, maintaining Code column (each species has a Code): Species Values Code 1 Acanthocybium solandri 33 LC 2 Makaira nigricans 20 VU 3 Makaira nigricans 20 VU 4. Makaira nigricans

Hai Sven, I do agree on somepoint here, but not all. First off all, samba does produce usefull reporting info. Depending on log levels you have set. ( man smb.conf /log level ). And then again we always have to ask, can you show the smb.conf. Not that i dont believe you have wrong setting but because i must see you have good setttings. And the problem is not always/only samba, keep in

On 21/05/2019 10:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once > again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten > different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to > be lower priority than malloc debug info". Once again, none of these > messages

On 21/05/2019 13:29, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > On 21.05.19 14:16, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> You need to > investigate your DB problems > > Great, but how? > >> I see no reason to have different smb.conf files for different Unix >> domain members, just don't have 'netbios name' in any smb.conf. > There's also share definitions in the

Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: > Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once > again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten > different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to > be lower priority than malloc debug info". Once again, none of these

On 21/05/2019 12:27, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > The smb.conf hasn't changed since the last three or four times I've > posted here asking for help: > > https://up.tao.at/u/samba/villach-file.txt > > Top level error I'm seeing is that since today *some* Windows users are > denied SMB access to this one member server ("Network password is >

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven > Schwedas via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 15:04 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and > this needs to improve > > On 21.05.19 14:37, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > > winbind enum

Sven, Fist fix the smb.conf as i suggested, cap and non caps where it should be. Resolving settings based on the script output looks ok. Fix krb5.conf Then how many DC's are you having? > So, could somebody maybe help with the NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION > / DRS replication issue? Or will it be easier to just demote > the DC and provision a new one? Are all DC's

My synapses are rather fried after a long few days of debugging other problems, so perhaps I'm being lazy in sending this to the general list, but I can't think straight about it. Forgive me if there is an overly obvious solution to this. I have a list of phone numbers that are SIP extensions. I'd like to dial them via SIP if ${EXTEN} is equal to one of those numbers. If

This seems exceptionally evil and is definitely a PITA. What was the original problem that led us to do this? I''d like to take a stab at correcting it so we can have a more sane installation. Regards, Anthony Liguori _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hai, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven > Schwedas via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 16:44 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and > this needs to improve > > On 21.05.19 16:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > >> Since Cyrus

On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Johnny, > > Should we give up hope on this issue? > After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA. But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines needing chrome, as the one directly from google currently works. > > > On

Hi! My telco is Deutsche Telekom and they got about 30 SIP servers right now. Currently I've set up a template for incoming calls in sip.conf and added each SIP server by it's IP address like this: [DTAG-in-1](DTAG-in-template) host=217.0.16.103 ... [DTAG-in-30](DTAG-in-template) host=217.0.20.99 I've done that to improve security and to be able to assign all calls coming in

The smb.conf hasn't changed since the last three or four times I've posted here asking for help: https://up.tao.at/u/samba/villach-file.txt Top level error I'm seeing is that since today *some* Windows users are denied SMB access to this one member server ("Network password is invalid"), but not all users. Worked fine before today. wbinfo -p/-P work, wbinfo -a shows the

Well. A priori. I'm a dedicated legacy OS person. I cut my teeth on command line DOS and then WIN 3.xx (these days that means WFWG 3.11). I drew the line at WIN9x. Hate that beast with a true passion, but because it is the 800 pound gorilla, I have to find some way to accomodate it in the future. So, here is the rub. Linux is a real PITA. Capital PITA. Unbelievably techie and that is bad.

The subject pretty much says it all. Does Asterisk support DNIS, and if so, what kind of connection is required? (T1, PRI) I've got a wink start T1. I've read comments that say the DNIS will be seen as an extension, but I'm seeing each digit of the DNIS as a separate extension. So in my case I send DNIS of 12345, Asterisk will jump from extension 1 to extension 2 to extension 3 to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization issues (mostly on lab situations). Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid

On 21.05.19 14:16, Rowland penny via samba wrote:> You need to investigate your DB problems Great, but how? > I see no reason to have different smb.conf files for different Unix > domain members, just don't have 'netbios name' in any smb.conf. There's also share definitions in the files which I omitted, which are the actual meat of the config files. > You will also

Can anyone point me at a good doc on farting about with the registry? Or do you feel like giving me the fool's guide? I have large tracts of registry entries to stuff in, and adding them via Edit/new in regedit is an absolute PITA and unworkably slow. I have files from exported from a win98 registry (via windoze regedit) with the correct info. I need to add because programs are not finding

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone else using CFS on CentOS 4.4 ? I have started using it today (unimportant stuff for now, for testing), and am wondering what are other people experiences with it. I'm using version 1.4.1, rpms kindly provided by Karan on his repository. My main concern is data loss, not security itself. From what I noticed, the strenght of CFS crypto is