search for: pimple

Hi all, I 'd like to fetch a list of structures, and found that it could be done via LLVMContextImpl *pImpl = Context.pImpl; pImpl->AnonStructTypes This however needs the inclusion of LLVMContextImpl.h, which is not contained in the includes dir, but in the lib/IR dir (next to the .cpp files) and is not installed under /usr/local/include... Whats the reason for this? Isn't it

Hello, the need here is to have a single LLVMContext used for multiple compilations. You make a good point about that by the way. If there are outstanding users cleaning the context under their seats might still pose a risk to them, and in that case deleting + newing a new LLVMContextImpl might actually not be very different. Marcello 2014-06-24 17:14 GMT+01:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at

On 18 Aug 2016, at 23:59, Richhiey Thomas <richhiey.thomas at gmail.com> wrote: > I've currently added a few classes which don't really belong to the public API (currently) into private headers and used PIMPL with the Cluster class. I'm having difficulty reading your changes, because you aren't keeping to one complete change per commit. So for instance you've added a

> > > > Actually, you're doing something slightly unusual there: making the > internal member public. Protected would be better, and private is I think > most usual; library clients aren't going to have access to the Internal > class declaration, so they can't call things on it. This means it's > actually difficult right now to subclass Feature. > > I

Hello, I'm trying to develop a way to reliably clean the LLVMContext in order to make it possible to use it multiple times. LLVMContext itself is an almost empty object delegating almost all its content to LLVMContextImpl. This makes it very clean ideally, because clearing the LLVMContext would be as easy as deleting the LLVMContextImpl and creating a new one. The problem is that for some

Something like, keeping the compiler alive for a many compilation sessions, using the same LLVMContext, but without the problem of accumulating data in the LLVMContext that would slowly fill up the memory. This as much I can enter into details that I can :/ Probably this is also a quite common use case scenario too. Marcello 2014-06-24 18:52 GMT+01:00 Eric Christopher <echristo at

Hi Mehdi, Thanks for your reply. It seems caused by random rename because I saw %struct.StructTyName.692.475*, which might be twice renaming. Does this collision occur because this type is declared more than once? I encountered this problem when used clang to compile transmission 1.42 (http://download.transmissionbt.com/files/) with configuration: "./configure --disable-gtk". Then

> How long does 200?300 documents take to cluster? How does it grow as more > documents are included in the MSet? We'd expect an MSet of 1000 documents > to take longer to cluster than one with 100, but the important thing is > _how_ the time increases as the number of documents grows. > > Currently, the number of seconds taken for clustering a set of documents for varying

Hi All, I generated the following code with "clang -flto" command. void test(struct StruTyName *a) { ... } Then the type of test function is "void (%struct.StruTyName.100*)" by calling function::getFunctionType API. What's the meaning of number 100? Best, Haopeng

I tried to compare two types. Because of renaming, the comparison result is not as expected. How to deal with renaming while comparing types? Best, Haopeng On 6/2/15 4:09 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote: > Hi Haopeng, > > One more element, I just noticed you are using LTO, I am not sure how it is implemented but my guess is that there is a shared LLVMContext. If multiple files include this

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:23 PM, James Aylett <james-xapian at tartarus.org> wrote: > >> How long does 200?300 documents take to cluster? How does it grow as > more documents are included in the MSet? We'd expect an MSet of 1000 > documents to take longer to cluster than one with 100, but the important > thing is _how_ the time increases as the number of documents

We have ClearCase database on unix and users on windows. We are creating Unix users locally on that Clearcase server. Samba is also installed on that server. User windows machines are part of domain. Groups,usres are created on domain and same users,groups are created on unix server. Now problem is occuring when a windows user is changing the password for his domain login. as soon as user is

Hi, I am trying to write a module pass that traverses through named structure types defined and modifies the type of certain fields in these named types. Is there any simple way of doing this? I am not quite sure how to get the LLVMContext's pImpl working from a pass since LLVMContextImpl is forward-declared. Thanks, Joe -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi, On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 15:18:51 Marcello Maggioni wrote: > I'm trying to develop a way to reliably clean the LLVMContext in order to > make it possible to use it multiple times. > > LLVMContext itself is an almost empty object delegating almost all its > content to LLVMContextImpl. > This makes it very clean ideally, because clearing the LLVMContext would be > as

Hi: I'm building a small tool on top of LLVM Core Library. ``` LLVMContext context; SMDiagnostic diag; Module *M = parseIRFile(InputIR, diag, context).get(); if (M == nullptr) { diag.print("LLVM", errs()); exit(-1); } assert(M->isMaterialized() && "Module not materialized!"); PointerType *ArrayPtrTy =

The mutex could be made an actual global static instead of a ManagedStatic. This guarantees it would be constructed before main, and live until the end of main. So even in PassRegistry's destructor, which would get call during llvm_shutdown(), it would always have the same mutex. Ideally I'd like to just delete the mutex, as it doesn't seem like anyone is using it in a

I actually had an idea about how to fix this in a relatively painless manner. Although given my experience over the past 4 days, it might not be best to call it painless without first trying :) The idea is to make a StaticPassRegistry. RegisterPass<> only touches the StaticPassRegistry, and nothing else touches the StaticPassRegistry. So once you enter main(), StaticPassRegistry can be

On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Joe Yan <jyan2 at umd.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to write a module pass that traverses through named structure > types defined and modifies the type of certain fields in these named types. > Is there any simple way of doing this? I am not quite sure how to get the > LLVMContext's pImpl working from a pass since LLVMContextImpl is

...performance of computer systems has been steadily increasing as faster processors, memory, and video cards are continuously being developed. The one key component that is often neglected when looking at improving the performance of a computer system is the hard drive. http://2site.com/jewgds Ass Pimples Vs Back Acne What is Back Acne ? Umm... Acne on your back. There you have it. Well there is a difference?compared to face acne . Back acne is one form of body acne and it''s a bitch to reach when you need to treat that really juicy volcanic pimple on your back. http://2site.com/cbgpay...

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] Need help in samba configuration Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:42:42 -0500 From: Brian Cowan <brcowan at gmail.com> To: Pankaj.C.Pimple at relianceada.com References: <OF3AAD32AD.86A5D538-ON65257671.002808E6-65257671.002851F0 at relianceada.com> If your Samba server is a fully operational domain member server, then the behavior you are experiencing should not be occurring. Period. Take a close look at your samba server...