search for: simple

Hello, My rails app is often not responding: see http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3299 Using latest lighttpd's freebsd port and rails 1.0 Thank your for your help ! _______________________________________________ Rails mailing list Rails-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails

.../bin/ruby18 /usr/home/www/public/dispatch.fcgi Restarting [22845] /usr/local/bin/ruby18 /usr/home/www/public/dispatch.fcgi Restarting [22846] /usr/local/bin/ruby18 /usr/home/www/public/dispatch.fcgi Restarting [22847] /usr/local/bin/ruby18 /usr/home/www/public/dispatch.fcgi --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline --prompt-mode simple --readline...

Are these 225 compile time regressions real? It sure looks bad! Ciao, Duncan. On 01/12/11 09:39, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results > > URL http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/ > Nickname bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386:4 > Name curlew.apple.com > > Run ID Order Start Time End Time > Current 380 0 2011-12-01 07:59:12 2011-12-01 08:42:06 > Previous 379 0 2011-11-30 08:13:45 2011-11-30 08:56:22 > > > Tests Summary > > Status...

...gt; 1 and only the first element will be used" I've read the help page of if() but I don't get it because when evaluating step by step the warning is not produced. Omitting the details of my function, below is an example of this ## Function fun <- function( n, result = c("simple", "complete") ) { if ( is.null(result) ) result <- "simple" if ( !(result %in% c("simple", "s", "complete", "c")) ) { stop("specify type of result 'simple' or 'complete'") } else { res...

Really sorry I missed this. Just found it looking for something else in my inbox. I think we should support this but * We should still err on other identifiers ".cfi_startport bar" is invalid. * If I read the gas documentation correctly, the effect of "simple" is to skip the initial cfi instructions. We should test if that is the case and implement it too. Accepting and ignoring "simple" is not very user friendly. On 11 July 2013 05:25, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote: > The statement > > .cfi_startpr...

...| 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.as | 4 + libswfdec/swfdec_as_initialize.h | 58 +++++++++++++++------------- libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++---- test/trace/Makefile.am | 9 ++++ test/trace/foreach-proto-simple-5.swf |binary test/trace/foreach-proto-simple-5.swf.trace | 4 + test/trace/foreach-proto-simple-6.swf |binary test/trace/foreach-proto-simple-6.swf.trace | 4 + test/trace/foreach-proto-simple-7.swf |binary test/trace/foreach-proto-simple-7.swf.trace | 4 + test/trace...

I'm trying to use ROCR to create a simple cutoff vs recall plot (recall at p) on the example ROCR.simple dataset: library(ROCR) data(ROCR.simple) pred <- prediction(ROCR.simple$predictions, ROCR.simple$labels) perf <- performance(pred, "rec") plot(perf) But R crashes on me on the last line. I'm using R 2.14.1, ROCR 1...

The first one failed on a diff: ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! ******************** Execution Context Diff: /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02/0.000000e+00 ****************...

Hi, Is there a way to see what the default argument llc takes from clang/clang++ ? I'm debugging my backend with a very simple c++ program. Running through *clang++ -target myTarget -S simple.cpp -o simple.s * (bug does no show up) gives me different results from *clang++ -target myTarget -S -emit-llvm -o simple.cpp -o simple.ll* *llc simple.ll -o simple.s *(bug shows up) Just trying to understand what's the differ...

Hello all. I''m working on a program that uses both ActiveRecord and PDF::Writer. The latter requires the Transaction::Simple module, and ActiveRecord contains a "built-in" copy of Transaction::Simple - but the namespaces appear to clash, if I''m understanding things correctly. (I''m a bit of a ruby nuby, so please excuse me if I''m misunderstanding this issue.) A brief demo: irb(main):...

 Hello, I wrote a very simple openGL application, as below #include #include int main(int argc, char **argv) {   glutInit(&argc, argv);   glutInitDisplayMode(GLUT_DOUBLE | GLUT_RGB | GLUT_DEPTH);   glutCreateWindow("red 3D lighted cube");   printf("GL_VERSION = %s\n",glGetString(GL_VERSION) );   retur...

I use the 'make TEST=simple' as a pre-commit test. I think that everybody should run these tests before committing to LLVM. On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:06 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. >...

...nternal server errors when submitting perf results to lnt.llvm.org http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/builds/1154/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio nt /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-0/report.simple.csv /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-1/report.simple.csv /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorizer/tests/nt/build/sample-2/report.simple.csv /home/grosser/buildslave/perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-before-vectorize...

...; > cp /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/instant.txt Output/ > > sse.expandfft.out-nat.time > > /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/DiffOutput.sh > "/home/jeremy/hardware > > /llvm/mysandbox/test-2014-06-24_20-20-59/tools/fpcmp -r 0.016" > simple > > sse.expandfft > > rm -f Output/sse.expandfft.exe-simple > > cp Output/sse.expandfft.diff-simple Output/sse.expandfft.exe-simple > > /bin/sh: 7: test: 0: unexpected operator > > if test -f Output/sse.expandfft.extra-results.txt; then \ > >...

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without > further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to > cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers implement more > sophisticated encoders than that. Most drivers implement such a > simple encoder and can use drm_simple_en...

when I create the report, there are no failures in it. so maybe these are being filtered for known failures. On 12/12/2012 05:03 PM, reed kotler wrote: > The first one failed on a diff: > ******************** TEST (simple) 'sse.expandfft' FAILED! > ******************** > Execution Context Diff: > /home/rkotler/llvmpb3/build/projects/test-suite/tools/fpcmp: Compared: > 1.139094e-07 and 1.159249e-07 > abs. diff = 2.015500e-09 rel.diff = 1.738626e-02 > Out of tolerance: rel/abs: 1.600000e-02...

...nce output was produced instantaneously. > cp /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/instant.txt > Output/sse.expandfft.out-nat.time > /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/DiffOutput.sh > "/home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/mysandbox/test-2014-06-24_20-20-59/tools/fpcmp > -r 0.016" simple sse.expandfft > rm -f Output/sse.expandfft.exe-simple > cp Output/sse.expandfft.diff-simple Output/sse.expandfft.exe-simple > /bin/sh: 7: test: 0: unexpected operator > if test -f Output/sse.expandfft.extra-results.txt; then \ > /home/jeremy/hardware/llvm/test-suite/ParseMultip...

Hi Thomas, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without > further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to > cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers implement more > sophisticated encoders than that. Most drivers implement such a > simple encoder and can use drm_simple_en...

...calling=yes transfer=yes cancallforward=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=yes callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 rxgain=-5 txgain=3 immediate=yes signalling=em_w context=zap-incoming group = 1 channel => 1-24 Here is the console output of what happens when the channels reset: -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/2-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/3-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/5-1' -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/6-1' -- Starting...

Hello, I am a beginner in LLVM development with the aim of writing a new optimization pass. But then before I could do that, I thought of writing simple passes. I could successfully implement the Hello pass as given in the doc. Then I wrote a simple Constant Folding pass - evaluate instructions of the form c=10+20 and replace all uses of c with 30. Only later did I realize that Clang does this optimization while building the IR. Hence I couldn'...