search for: pierres

Am 14.11.19 um 15:02 schrieb Paul Slootman via rsync: > On Thu 14 Nov 2019, Pierre Bernhardt via rsync wrote: > So it's looking for b/a as the link-dest directory. > > Use a full pathname for --link-dest to remove all uncertainty. > E.g.: > > rsync -av --link-dest=$(pwd)/a a/ b/ > > In this case, as the destination is also in same current directory, you >

Am 14.11.19 um 10:54 schrieb Paul Slootman via rsync: > You need to specify the source directory as the link-dest directory. Hi, I tried it also because it's an old question which has never worked for me. Instead it creates copies and not hard links: pierre at in94:~/tmp$ ls -li a b a: insgesamt 8 257315 -rw-r--r-- 1 pierre pierre 4 Nov 14 10:53 1 257316 -rw-r--r-- 1 pierre pierre 6 Nov

Have a directory with a bunch rpms in it, mostly x86_64. Have another directory with a bunch, mostly 'noarch'. Some of the noarch files are already in the x86_64 dir and don't want to overwrite them. They are on the same physical disk, so really, just want the new 'noarch' files hardlinked into the destination. sitting in the noarch dir, I tried: rsync -auv

Hello list, Still need your help configuring proxy infrastructure. Today, I really struggle configuring master passwords forwarding. What I want: master user can connect to any other account, on proxy. Could please somebody help me, I read both articles about this on wiki, but still can't connect :( What I did: on proxy: auth_master_user_separator=* passdb sql { args =

Hi all My client want a shared folder so that only two people can access and write to it. I added the following to my smb.conf [private] writeble = yes guest ok = no path = /home/samba/private valid users = wendy, pierre write list = wendy, pierre force user = nobody All i need yo do now is make the folder "private" to nobody. How would i go on by doing that and would this work.

Hello, I am using samba server as members of windows AD domain , with "security = ADS", the logins unix and windows are aligned. Since the version 3.0.34 , I have strange behaviour on shares where we use "valid users" with unix groups it does'nt work. Nok: Valid users = @group1 Valid users = +group1 Still work : Valid users = Domain\user Valid users = user The bad

Hi, I'm trying to replace pointer typed alloca instructions to allocate a vector of pointers. The idea is to change from [1] to [2]: [1]: %0 = alloca i<N>* [2]: %0 = alloca <3 x i8*> I did it this way: - first, create and insert [2] (for debug purpose, not necessary to insert) - mutate type so that replaceAllUsesWith can be called in a correctly typed way - replace all

Hi guys, I'm trying to use Asterisk with LDAP integration. I created some schemas and it seems to work fine for sip.conf replacement. When I try to register a softphone to test the service, it seems ok from the softphone point of view (user registred) but when I do a "sip show peers", no one is registered (nor sip show subrscriptions, users...) I put my Asterisk on full debug and I

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: >> On 26 May 2015, at 00:39, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: >>> Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x80000002 when given an unknown >>> UUID, revision ID

Hi, Thanks both of you for the help. I just missed that Create function had many optional arguments... sorry for that. However my problem wasn't coming from here (IRBuilder CreateCall function still return a pointer to CallInst so I just added 2 times the call?). I didn't wanted to detail the all issue previously because I knew I had a problem with my syntax. So here's my problem: I

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86539 Bug ID: 86539 Summary: [NVAC] Trying to register nv_backlight after NV96 did it Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

On 11:06 AM - Apr 15 2016, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > > Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, > > nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already > > existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, but keeps

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > wrote: > > On 11:06 AM - Apr 15 2016, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > wrote: > >> > Currently, every backlight

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104672 Bug ID: 104672 Summary: [NVAC] Compiz segfaults on login on Ubuntu 17.10 with Unity 7 (kernel DRM bug?) Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Hello It is my first question here and I would like to thanks all of you to keep alive this stream and to give answers (I regulary read). Thanks for the good job. After installing CENTOS4.2 and "play with" I type the command swapon -s to verify everythings is ok but the command does nor return info as it should do. Is it something known ? Thanks Jean-Pierre Castello HP France mobile :

On 2020-06-29 18:05, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:57:14 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:43:57PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote: >>> An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host >>> access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the

Hello list, Short introduction: I'm Pierre, on my non-free time I work for Red Hat in Farnborough, UK. I'm not really using Samba extensively myself, but how could one not love a source tree containing torture.c and weird.c? About that, if anyone can explain what the latter is for, I'd be very interested... "Add the weird charset in 3_0 and build it by default for ./configure

On 2020-06-29 18:05, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:57:14 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:43:57PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote: >>> An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host >>> access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the

On 2020-06-10 15:24, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:11:51 +0200 > Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Protected Virtualisation protects the memory of the guest and >> do not allow a the host to access all of its memory. >> >> Let's refuse a VIRTIO device which does not use IOMMU >> protected access. >> >>

On 2020-06-10 15:24, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:11:51 +0200 > Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Protected Virtualisation protects the memory of the guest and >> do not allow a the host to access all of its memory. >> >> Let's refuse a VIRTIO device which does not use IOMMU >> protected access. >> >>