search for: pierre

Am 14.11.19 um 15:02 schrieb Paul Slootman via rsync: > On Thu 14 Nov 2019, Pierre Bernhardt via rsync wrote: > So it's looking for b/a as the link-dest directory. > > Use a full pathname for --link-dest to remove all uncertainty. > E.g.: > > rsync -av --link-dest=$(pwd)/a a/ b/ > > In this case, as the destination is also in same current direct...

Am 14.11.19 um 10:54 schrieb Paul Slootman via rsync: > You need to specify the source directory as the link-dest directory. Hi, I tried it also because it's an old question which has never worked for me. Instead it creates copies and not hard links: pierre at in94:~/tmp$ ls -li a b a: insgesamt 8 257315 -rw-r--r-- 1 pierre pierre 4 Nov 14 10:53 1 257316 -rw-r--r-- 1 pierre pierre 6 Nov 14 10:53 2 b: insgesamt 0 pierre at in94:~/tmp$ rsync -av --link-dest=a a/ b/ sending incremental file list --link-dest arg does not exist: a ./ 1 2 sent 194 bytes...

Have a directory with a bunch rpms in it, mostly x86_64. Have another directory with a bunch, mostly 'noarch'. Some of the noarch files are already in the x86_64 dir and don't want to overwrite them. They are on the same physical disk, so really, just want the new 'noarch' files hardlinked into the destination. sitting in the noarch dir, I tried: rsync -auv

...rd_query = SELECT password FROM master_users WHERE username= '%u' AND status = 'ok' I also tried on proxy: password_query = SELECT NULL AS password, host, 'Y' AS nologin, 'Y' AS nodelay, 'Y' AS nopassword, 'Y' AS proxy,'%u' as user ,'%u*pierre' as destuser, '123' as pass FROM proxy WHERE domain = '%d' instead of password_query = SELECT NULL AS password, host, 'Y' AS nologin, 'Y' AS nodelay, 'Y' AS nopassword, 'Y' AS proxy,'%u' as user FROM proxy WHERE domain = '%d'...

Hi all My client want a shared folder so that only two people can access and write to it. I added the following to my smb.conf [private] writeble = yes guest ok = no path = /home/samba/private valid users = wendy, pierre write list = wendy, pierre force user = nobody All i need yo do now is make the folder "private" to nobody. How would i go on by doing that and would this work. Regards Gerald

...does'nt work. Nok: Valid users = @group1 Valid users = +group1 Still work : Valid users = Domain\user Valid users = user The bad workaround found , is to use a file users.map and add the entry below: user = domaine\user could you help me ? Regards. _________________________________________ Pierre DUPEYRAT EMEA Unix Systems - Data Center HP AL Enterprise Services (France) SAS OnNET 21067296 Phone :+33 02 96 04 72 96 Fax: +33 02 96 04 83 41 mailto : pierre.dupeyrat at alcatel-lucent.com<mailto:pierre.dupeyrat at alcatel-lucent.com> or pierre.dupeyrat at hp.com<mailto:pierre.dupeyra...

...t;(FDP_fatvector)); cast<Value>(AI)->mutateType(cast<Value>(FDP_AI)->getType()); cast<Value>(AI)->replaceAllUsesWith(cast<Value>(FDP_AI)); } } I am getting an error at optimization time. After my pass ran, during the Bitcode Writer pass time: opt: /home/pierre/Desktop/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Writer/ValueEnumerator.h:162: unsigned int llvm::ValueEnumerator::getTypeID(llvm::Type*) const: Assertion `I != TypeMap.end() && "Type not in ValueEnumerator!"' failed. #0 0x0000000002a95b5c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) /home/pier...

...dc=example, dc=com' [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] res_config_ldap.c: basedn: 'dc=example, dc=com' => 'dc=example, dc=com' [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] res_config_ldap.c: Everything seems fine. [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] res_config_ldap.c: name='name' value='Pierre' [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] res_config_ldap.c: name='host' value='dynamic' [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] res_config_ldap.c: LINE(289) attribute_name: canreinvite LDAP value: no [Mar 21 16:53:54] DEBUG[12002] res_config_ldap.c: LINE(289) attribute_name: regserver LDAP value:...

On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: >> On 26 May 2015, at 00:39, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: >>> Most _DSM will return an integer value of 0x...

...;> used on a null pointer"' failed I tried to clone the current instruction to not modify the iterator but the ReplaceInstWithInst will cause troubles (probably because a copied instruction has no parents): #0 0x0000000002a95b5c llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) /home/pierre/Desktop/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:400:0 #1 0x0000000002a95edf PrintStaI tried to clone the current instruction to not modify the iterator but the ReplaceInstWithInst will cause troublesckTraceSignalHandler(void*) /home/pierre/Desktop/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:468:0 #2 0x0000000002a9...

...Product: xorg Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: pierre.morrow at free.fr QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Created attachment 109822 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=109822&action=edit dmesg Hardware: * 9600M GT (NV96) * 9400M (NVAC) Tested on http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~darktama/nouveau/commit/?id=1a9d15cb98ec...

On 11:06 AM - Apr 15 2016, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > > Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the same name, > > nv_backlight. This leads to a sysfs warning as it tries to create an already > > existing folder. This patch adds a incremented number to the name, bu...

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > wrote: > > On 11:06 AM - Apr 15 2016, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > wrote: > >> > Currently, every backlight interface created by Nouveau uses the...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104672 Bug ID: 104672 Summary: [NVAC] Compiz segfaults on login on Ubuntu 17.10 with Unity 7 (kernel DRM bug?) Product: Mesa Version: git Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

...of you to keep alive this stream and to give answers (I regulary read). Thanks for the good job. After installing CENTOS4.2 and "play with" I type the command swapon -s to verify everythings is ok but the command does nor return info as it should do. Is it something known ? Thanks Jean-Pierre Castello HP France mobile : + 33 (0) 6 72 99 37 40 E-MAIL : Jean-Pierre.Castello at hp.com (The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error you should delete it from your system immediately and advi...

On 2020-06-29 18:05, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:57:14 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:43:57PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote: >>> An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host >>> access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the >>> use of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. >>> >>> Let's give a chance to the architecture to acce...

Hello list, Short introduction: I'm Pierre, on my non-free time I work for Red Hat in Farnborough, UK. I'm not really using Samba extensively myself, but how could one not love a source tree containing torture.c and weird.c? About that, if anyone can explain what the latter is for, I'd be very interested... "Add the weird char...

On 2020-06-29 18:05, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 11:57:14 -0400 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:43:57PM +0200, Pierre Morel wrote: >>> An architecture protecting the guest memory against unauthorized host >>> access may want to enforce VIRTIO I/O device protection through the >>> use of VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM. >>> >>> Let's give a chance to the architecture to acce...

On 2020-06-10 15:24, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:11:51 +0200 > Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Protected Virtualisation protects the memory of the guest and >> do not allow a the host to access all of its memory. >> >> Let's refuse a VIRTIO device which does not use IOMMU >> protected access. >> &gt...

On 2020-06-10 15:24, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:11:51 +0200 > Pierre Morel <pmorel at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > >> Protected Virtualisation protects the memory of the guest and >> do not allow a the host to access all of its memory. >> >> Let's refuse a VIRTIO device which does not use IOMMU >> protected access. >> &gt...