search for: pics

...2-19:23:54 0 - 1.91G - home/cjg at hour_20 390K - 1.96G - home/cjg at hour_21 332K - 1.96G - home/cjg at hour_22 180K - 1.96G - home/cjg at 2006-05-12-22:10:59 0 - 1.99G - home/cjg at 2006-05-12-22:11:09 0 - 1.99G - home/cjg/pics 4.65G 138M 4.61G /export/home/cjg/pics home/cjg/pics at month_02 0 - 4.52G - home/cjg/pics at 2006-02-02-07:53:46 0 - 4.52G - home/cjg/pics at minute_43 0 - 4.52G - home/cjg/pics at minute_44 0 - 4.52G - home/cjg/pics at minute_45 0...

Actually, GCC will generate non-PIC for n64. Maybe that is a recent addition, but we are using its results. Even if PIC may be faster and smaller code, it seems that non-PIC is still useful for bare-metal. That's the driver of my interest. I guess we can just test what happens when that part of the conditional is removed. As a side note, if it isn't supported then we should probably

Anton, >> Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? > I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. Right. Maybe we should collect references and do some LLVM PIC documentation and put it on LLVM website ? >> I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF >> and MachO backends. > ABI is normally induced

Hello I am using a Junghanns QuadBRI ISDN card - the module name is qozap. If I like at my interrupt assignment, qozap is sharing interrupt 10 with libata and uhci_hcd. I think libata is the IDE hard drive module and uhci_hcd is a USB module. linux:~ # modprobe qozap linux:~ # cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 12634579 XT-PIC timer 1: 10 XT-PIC i8042

Hi, I have been going crazy over the last few weeks trying to install a new Samba server (using v2.2.1, v2.2.5 and v2.2.6) to replace a old system. Problem seems to be with file locking on the new server - works perfectly on old server!! Attached are configuration files for Samba for old (smb205.conf) and new (smb226.conf) servers, plus the source of a Cobol test program (samtest.cbl) that

Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c

hi list. after my unsuccessfull experiences with mISDN i tried again to implement a zaphfc based solution. problem is: sound on calls via capi is stuttering/broken and therefore unuseable. my conf: - cel 1300, 256mb ram - avm b1 via capi connected to my outgoing ISDN - acer surf pci via zaphafc and crosslink cable with termination as internal bus - siemens gigaset 3035 as internal phone -

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:34 PM, James Molloy wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't seen those errors. Clang and LLVM both build with no warnings on the 3 versions of GCC I test with. MSVC reports loads of warnings however. > $ make happiness ... Updated to revision 142790. ... make[4]: Entering directory `/home/ecsardu/LLVM/build-tcclab1/tools/clang/tools/libclang' llvm[4]: Compiling

> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Booting error - Unable to specify channel 2: > No such device I just went through all this as well. The best thing to do IMHO is to try to find a way to manually assign IRQ in the BIOS. Also, and this is what I didn't see at first, some slots SHARE IRQ. Avoid this! If you are not using USB at all, turn it off in BIOS if possible. Tell the BIOS

Hi, Every time I dial into my asterisk box i hear nothing but asterisk jittering. The following is an example of what I get on the asterisk CLI Thanks *CLI> DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3826 (check_user): Setting NAT on RTP to 0 DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4807 (handle_request): Check for res DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 952 (find_user): Call from user

Hello, Aaron > Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? I'd bet all platform ABI are more or less documented. > I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF and MachO backends. ABI is normally induced by platform, not by architecture or object file format (however they can influence on it). 1. Windows is PIC by design. Google for

Has anyone experimented with generating non-PIC for MIPS64 and the n64 ABI? Currently MipsISelLowering.cpp uses conditions like: if ((getTargetMachine().getRelocationModel() == Reloc::PIC_) || IsN64) { } around any PIC code generation. Is generating non-PIC just untested, or is it known not to work? I can't find any discussion of it anywhere. I ran into this when trying to see why

Excuse my ignorance here, but I am desperately trying to isolate the IRQ for my TE110P card (shown below as t1xxp) Ive gone into my bios and disabled all usb , parallel, serial and some other devices, those that I needed to keep, I have moved off of IRQ 10 and onto IRQ 5, but everytime I boot up, I get usb-uhci and ehci_hcd using IRQ 10 as well as my Digium card. Does anybody know what these are

Anton, Sorry I have not replied earlier. Can I ask what platform ABI's are documented other than Itanium ? I need to get to understand PIC on x86, x86_64 and PowerPC for the COFF and MachO backends. Thanks, Aaron 2009/6/15 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> > Hello, Aaron > > > Is there any overview or detailed socumentation on LLVM PIC ? > Did you

an obvious fix to PIC IO intercept. In PIC IO, address from send_pio_req is physical address already. Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Yang <xiaowei.yang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi All, I have an equipment loaded with 4 X100P (numbered 1-4)) and one T400P (numbered 5-8). Everything works fine except that I cannot use one of the FXS ports (number 5). If I configure zapata.conf to recognize it, the whole system voice quality suffers. I've tried already to switch PCI slots, with no results. Below is a snapshot of my /proc/interrupts, maybe this can shed some light on

Hello. I have a MinITX motherboard with only one pci slot and one onboard ethernet interface, I have a TDM04B card plugged into that motherboard and the /proc/interrupts: CPU0 0: 169626332 XT-PIC timer 1: 1270 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 4 XT-PIC rtc 12: 170166219 XT-PIC eth0, wctdm 14:

Hi all, I am using a TDM400P card with 2 FXS and 2 FXO modules. Everything seems nice, but i'm not able to make calls nor to receive any. When I try to make a call, I keep receiven the "all circuits are busy now" message, and when I receive calls, asterisk doesn't seems to care (don't get anything on the CLI) I'm using Asterisk 1.2.17 and Zaptel 1.2.16 from Xorcom's

I have an existing entry in my DB under the "users" table that has a column name "pic". I have a file column field when a new user signs up, and it work great. I am now trying to give existing users the ability to add or change their "pic". But, no matter what I do the entry comes up blank. Here''s what I have so far: View: <%= start_form_tag ({:action

Hi all, Stuck at this problem for several days. Tried to use named_scope, scope_out, and plugin such as searchlogic, but no result. The problem is as follows: I have a pic table and tag table, and a join table called pic_tag (with only pic_id and tag_id) so that I can associate N pics to M tags. This is the tutorial way to set up a many- to-many association. I''m trying to implement a simple search function, so that I can search for a picture with several given tags. Now say I want to search for pics that are tagged with "dog" and "cat". The simplest...