Displaying 20 results from an estimated 52 matches for "phsyically".
2003 Aug 10
4
Strange things going on with 4.8
Hi all!
I'm having problems no end on my 4.8-STABLE box, and I hope you can help me.
My processes get lots of signals (mostly 6, 10 and 11), and my kernel dumps
core very often. I have the core dumps from the 4 latest crashes. See
attachment for more info.
Notice the common values for IdlePTD and initial pcb. Does this mean anything?
There are other problems as well:
1) Some time ago KDE
2015 Dec 09
2
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
Hi all,
Virtual ISAs such as WebAssembly and NVPTX use infinite virtual register
sets instead of traditional phsyical registers. PrologEpilogInserter is run
after register allocation and asserts that all virtuals have been allocated
but doesn't otherwise depend on this if scavenging is not needed. We'd like
to use the target-independent PEI code for WebAssembly, so we're proposing
a
2007 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newbie. Questions about backend.
Hello,
I have been studying LLVM and started to create a new backend for a
new RISC architecture. Now I need some help to get forward with my
project. I'm quite new to compiling techniques so I'm sorry for the
stupid questions.
Question 1:
My idea is to lower the select SDNode as follows:
%res1 = %falseVal
%res2 = setc %trueVal, %condition
Where setc is conditional mov. The
2015 Dec 10
2
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Derek Schuff via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:31:31 PM
> > Subject: [llvm-dev] Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
> >
> >
2003 Jun 20
2
Zsh fork bomb paniced my kernel.
Hi,
My machine just bombed when I did the following stupid command.
:(){:|:};:
Zsh chewed up everything on the machine...
I ran it knowing I'd probably have to reboot.
But, I hardly expected it to panic.
Or, was that normal?
Anyway, the following is some detail...
Please mail me if there is more I'm ment to do.
Thanks in advance :)
ultraviolet@tulip:~ %> uname -a
FreeBSD
2015 Dec 10
3
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would actually go the other direction, i.e., stick to physical registers but with an infinite number.
> The rational is that after register allocation we broke all the nice properties of the pre-alloc virtual registers. For instance, the existing liveness algorithm cannot be used
2003 Jul 29
1
kern/53717: 4.8-RELEASE kernel panic (page fault)
Some more crashes of 4.8-RELEASE.
Lets see what do I have today:
# ls -l /var/crash
total 1576676
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jul 30 13:31 bounds
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jun 25 17:30 kernel.0
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 4 00:08 kernel.1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 15 19:28 kernel.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 16 17:50 kernel.3
2006 Jan 19
6
One Last Question for me..
And then I should be ready to roll with my project.. I have some fine
tuning of the looks to do after, but funtionality first!
This is probably a rails question.. but I''m not sure where to sign up
for the rails questions email group? (I guess I turned this into a 2
question email).
I''ll ask here and then if someone will send me the url of where I go
to sign up for the rails
2003 May 13
1
Kernel panic on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE
Hi,
I need some help to understand a backtrace.
The situation is as follows:
A diskless system acting as a kind of bandwithshaping firewall with both
ipfw2 and ipfilter active at the same time. Ipfilter is used for port
adress translation. The system panics about once every 6 hours. The
network load is very low, only one Windows XP machine is connected but
not actively used.
I added a disk
2008 Sep 21
0
Bridge stops forwarding on fc8 xen 3.1
I have raised this issue a couple of times and had no response. I am
hoping that in the last few months someone else may have had the same
scenario and have had more success in resolving the issue than I am.
I have 3 domUs running 2.6.21.7-5.fc8xen, running on a 32 bit host
running 2.6.21-7.fc7xen (xen-3.1.2-2.fc7)
I have had a number of occerances where the bridge stops forwarding
packets
2003 Jun 22
1
savecore: warning: /kernel version mismatch: ...
Morning all ...
'K, this one is a first for me ... server crashed this aft and savecore
wouldn't dump the resultant core:
pluto# savecore -v /vm/crash
dumplo = 4362141696 (8519808 * 512)
savecore: warning: /kernel version mismatch:
"FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #1: Sat May 31 22:57:04 ADT 2003
"
and " #(#(#("
savecore: reboot
savecore: dump time is zero
2003 Apr 07
0
strange crash
Dear collagues,
could someone sched me a light about the following crash (I'm almost sure about
hardware, temperature, etc...)
Machine is fairly stable; however, there are occational crashes, similar to
this one; backtraces are almost always single-step.
It's 4.8-R, dmesg and gdb -k output follows
====================================================================================
2003 Apr 08
0
Panic dereferencing p->p_leader during exit1()
My wife got the following from a system running (effectively)
4.8-RELEASE (I built/installed world just before the kernel version
was updated from 4.8-RC to 4.8-RELEASE). I gather she made a few
attempts to get mozilla to start and then the system panic'd.
According to the crashdump, p->p_leader is NULL but according to
the code, this can never happen. This is a UP Athlon XP-1800
with
2003 Jun 12
0
panic possibly related to soft updates? (4.8-STABLE, Jun 12 2003)
Hello list,
I have been fighting this problem for a few days now. I have changed memory
and opened the case and monitored for heat. I have been getting the same
panic about every 12 to 24 hours. I can let the system sit idle, or run it
under a heavy load (cpu and disk), but the panics dont seem to be related to
system load. It looks to me like a dangling pointer in
softdep_update_inodeblock,
2003 Sep 29
4
panics on 24 hour boundaries
Hi stable, nice you see you again. I was one of those guys who was seeing
constand panics on 24 hour boundaries but couldn't provide a backtrace due
to the ar device not taking a dump. I installed a dedicated drive just to
take the dump, and then didn't have a panic for a couple weeks. Now, I am
back with, and I have traces to share.
The first two, from 2003-09-27 and 2003-09-28
2003 Jun 23
2
Kernel core dump in recent 4.8-STABLE
Today my system coredumped (4.8-STABLE from Saturday), I believe it's somehow
X11 related:
X11 crashed first (signal 11). I was running it as root (I know I shouldn't).
I didn't think about it and restarted X11. While it was starting, I had a look
at the console, there was a bright white message: issignal.
This shows up at X11 startup.
Then the system coredumped.
Below is more
2003 Jun 06
0
crash in networking code (with bt and debug kernel)
While I was tying down a supernet to the discard interface, the box crashed
on me. Its a STABLE box from June 4th. I was in zebra at the time and
thought I would route a /24 to ds0 instead of to the IP on ds0 (which I had
done for a number of other aggregate routes). The only other "strange"
thing about the box is that ds0 is loaded via kld. I will see if I can
reproduce it on a
2003 Jun 07
0
FFS related panic in 4.8-STABLE
Every few days now I get a panic like the one shown in the attached
backtrace. I've made sure my filesystem is clean with fsck and even
turned off write caching on my IDE drive. Maybe someone here can
figure out what is wrong. Let me know if you need more information.
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
root@taco /usr/src/sys/compile/ZOE> gdb -k -c /opt/savecore/vmcore.0
2015 Dec 10
2
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Quentin Colombet" <qcolombet at apple.com>
>> To: "Derek Schuff" <dschuff at google.com>
>> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, December
2007 May 30
30
[VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d
The following 5 patches are re-submissions of the vt-d patch.
This set of patches has been tested against cs# 15080 and is
now much more mature and tested against more environments than
the original patch. Specifically, we have successfully tested
the patch with following environements:
- 32/64-bit Linux HVM guest
- 32-bit Windows XP/Vista (64-bit should work but did not test)
-