search for: phsyically

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 52 matches for "phsyically".

2003 Aug 10
4
Strange things going on with 4.8
Hi all! I'm having problems no end on my 4.8-STABLE box, and I hope you can help me. My processes get lots of signals (mostly 6, 10 and 11), and my kernel dumps core very often. I have the core dumps from the 4 latest crashes. See attachment for more info. Notice the common values for IdlePTD and initial pcb. Does this mean anything? There are other problems as well: 1) Some time ago KDE
2015 Dec 09
2
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
Hi all, Virtual ISAs such as WebAssembly and NVPTX use infinite virtual register sets instead of traditional phsyical registers. PrologEpilogInserter is run after register allocation and asserts that all virtuals have been allocated but doesn't otherwise depend on this if scavenging is not needed. We'd like to use the target-independent PEI code for WebAssembly, so we're proposing a
2007 Oct 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newbie. Questions about backend.
Hello, I have been studying LLVM and started to create a new backend for a new RISC architecture. Now I need some help to get forward with my project. I'm quite new to compiling techniques so I'm sorry for the stupid questions. Question 1: My idea is to lower the select SDNode as follows: %res1 = %falseVal %res2 = setc %trueVal, %condition Where setc is conditional mov. The
2015 Dec 10
2
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Derek Schuff via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > > Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:31:31 PM > > Subject: [llvm-dev] Allowing virtual registers after register allocation > > > >
2003 Jun 20
2
Zsh fork bomb paniced my kernel.
Hi, My machine just bombed when I did the following stupid command. :(){:|:};: Zsh chewed up everything on the machine... I ran it knowing I'd probably have to reboot. But, I hardly expected it to panic. Or, was that normal? Anyway, the following is some detail... Please mail me if there is more I'm ment to do. Thanks in advance :) ultraviolet@tulip:~ %> uname -a FreeBSD
2015 Dec 10
3
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 4:13 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I would actually go the other direction, i.e., stick to physical registers but with an infinite number. > The rational is that after register allocation we broke all the nice properties of the pre-alloc virtual registers. For instance, the existing liveness algorithm cannot be used
2003 Jul 29
1
kern/53717: 4.8-RELEASE kernel panic (page fault)
Some more crashes of 4.8-RELEASE. Lets see what do I have today: # ls -l /var/crash total 1576676 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jul 30 13:31 bounds -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jun 25 17:30 kernel.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 4 00:08 kernel.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 15 19:28 kernel.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2193252 Jul 16 17:50 kernel.3
2006 Jan 19
6
One Last Question for me..
And then I should be ready to roll with my project.. I have some fine tuning of the looks to do after, but funtionality first! This is probably a rails question.. but I''m not sure where to sign up for the rails questions email group? (I guess I turned this into a 2 question email). I''ll ask here and then if someone will send me the url of where I go to sign up for the rails
2003 May 13
1
Kernel panic on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE
Hi, I need some help to understand a backtrace. The situation is as follows: A diskless system acting as a kind of bandwithshaping firewall with both ipfw2 and ipfilter active at the same time. Ipfilter is used for port adress translation. The system panics about once every 6 hours. The network load is very low, only one Windows XP machine is connected but not actively used. I added a disk
2008 Sep 21
0
Bridge stops forwarding on fc8 xen 3.1
I have raised this issue a couple of times and had no response. I am hoping that in the last few months someone else may have had the same scenario and have had more success in resolving the issue than I am. I have 3 domUs running 2.6.21.7-5.fc8xen, running on a 32 bit host running 2.6.21-7.fc7xen (xen-3.1.2-2.fc7) I have had a number of occerances where the bridge stops forwarding packets
2003 Jun 22
1
savecore: warning: /kernel version mismatch: ...
Morning all ... 'K, this one is a first for me ... server crashed this aft and savecore wouldn't dump the resultant core: pluto# savecore -v /vm/crash dumplo = 4362141696 (8519808 * 512) savecore: warning: /kernel version mismatch: "FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #1: Sat May 31 22:57:04 ADT 2003 " and " #(#(#(" savecore: reboot savecore: dump time is zero
2003 Apr 07
0
strange crash
Dear collagues, could someone sched me a light about the following crash (I'm almost sure about hardware, temperature, etc...) Machine is fairly stable; however, there are occational crashes, similar to this one; backtraces are almost always single-step. It's 4.8-R, dmesg and gdb -k output follows ====================================================================================
2003 Apr 08
0
Panic dereferencing p->p_leader during exit1()
My wife got the following from a system running (effectively) 4.8-RELEASE (I built/installed world just before the kernel version was updated from 4.8-RC to 4.8-RELEASE). I gather she made a few attempts to get mozilla to start and then the system panic'd. According to the crashdump, p->p_leader is NULL but according to the code, this can never happen. This is a UP Athlon XP-1800 with
2003 Jun 12
0
panic possibly related to soft updates? (4.8-STABLE, Jun 12 2003)
Hello list, I have been fighting this problem for a few days now. I have changed memory and opened the case and monitored for heat. I have been getting the same panic about every 12 to 24 hours. I can let the system sit idle, or run it under a heavy load (cpu and disk), but the panics dont seem to be related to system load. It looks to me like a dangling pointer in softdep_update_inodeblock,
2003 Sep 29
4
panics on 24 hour boundaries
Hi stable, nice you see you again. I was one of those guys who was seeing constand panics on 24 hour boundaries but couldn't provide a backtrace due to the ar device not taking a dump. I installed a dedicated drive just to take the dump, and then didn't have a panic for a couple weeks. Now, I am back with, and I have traces to share. The first two, from 2003-09-27 and 2003-09-28
2003 Jun 23
2
Kernel core dump in recent 4.8-STABLE
Today my system coredumped (4.8-STABLE from Saturday), I believe it's somehow X11 related: X11 crashed first (signal 11). I was running it as root (I know I shouldn't). I didn't think about it and restarted X11. While it was starting, I had a look at the console, there was a bright white message: issignal. This shows up at X11 startup. Then the system coredumped. Below is more
2003 Jun 06
0
crash in networking code (with bt and debug kernel)
While I was tying down a supernet to the discard interface, the box crashed on me. Its a STABLE box from June 4th. I was in zebra at the time and thought I would route a /24 to ds0 instead of to the IP on ds0 (which I had done for a number of other aggregate routes). The only other "strange" thing about the box is that ds0 is loaded via kld. I will see if I can reproduce it on a
2003 Jun 07
0
FFS related panic in 4.8-STABLE
Every few days now I get a panic like the one shown in the attached backtrace. I've made sure my filesystem is clean with fsck and even turned off write caching on my IDE drive. Maybe someone here can figure out what is wrong. Let me know if you need more information. Michael -------------- next part -------------- root@taco /usr/src/sys/compile/ZOE> gdb -k -c /opt/savecore/vmcore.0
2015 Dec 10
2
Allowing virtual registers after register allocation
> On Dec 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Quentin Colombet" <qcolombet at apple.com> >> To: "Derek Schuff" <dschuff at google.com> >> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> Sent: Wednesday, December
2007 May 30
30
[VTD][patch 0/5] HVM device assignment using vt-d
The following 5 patches are re-submissions of the vt-d patch. This set of patches has been tested against cs# 15080 and is now much more mature and tested against more environments than the original patch. Specifically, we have successfully tested the patch with following environements: - 32/64-bit Linux HVM guest - 32-bit Windows XP/Vista (64-bit should work but did not test) -